Assessing the Role of Primary Heart Failure Etiology on Cardiac Transplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There are diverse indications for heart transplantation (HTx), often categorized into ischemic (ICM) and nonischemic (NICM) cardiomyopathy. Although there is extensive research comparing the outcomes for these disease processes following certain therapeutic interventions, there are limited data on how recipient etiology impacts post-HTx survival. Our investigation seeks to identify this relationship. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using adult HTx patients from the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2000 and 2021. Patients with a combined heart-lung transplant or previous HTx were excluded. ICM included coronary artery disease (CAD) and ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. NICM included nonischemic dilated (NIDCM), hypertrophic (HCM), and restrictive (RCM) cardiomyopathy. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 42 268 patients were included in our study. Recipients with ICM were older and more likely to be males, obese, diabetics, and smokers. We found that patients with ICM had an increased incidence of transplant CAD (OR = 1.23, p < 0.001) and risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22, p < 0.001) compared to NICM. When NICM was expanded, RCM had a similar hazard risk compared to ICM (HR = 1.03, p = 0.650), whereas both NIDCM (HR = 0.81, p < 0.001) and HCM (HR = 0.70, p < 0.001) had improved survival. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence to suggest that ICM has decreased survival when compared to NICM. When NICM was expanded, RCM was found to have an increased mortality risk similar to ICM, whereas NIDCM and HCM both had superior outcomes. The clinical implication of this investigation will allow clinicians to better understand the prognosis of certain patient groups.

Heart Transplant Human Leukocyte Antigen Matching in the Modern Era.

BACKGROUND: Although numerous reports have studied the consequences of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching in renal transplantation, there are limited and outdated data analyzing this association in thoracic organ transplantation. Therefore, our study reviewed the impact of HLA mismatching at both the total and the loci levels in the modern-era heart-transplant procedure on survival and chronic rejection outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients after heart transplant by using the United Network for Organ Sharing database from January 2005-July 2021. Total HLA and HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR mismatches were analyzed. Survival and cardiac allograft vasculopathy were the outcomes of interest during a 10-year follow-up period using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests and multivariable regression models. RESULTS: A total of 33,060 patients were included in this study. Recipients with a high degree of HLA mismatching had increased incidences of acute organ rejection. There were no significant differences in mortality rates among any of the total or loci level groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences between total HLA mismatch groups in time to first cardiac allograft vasculopathy, though mismatching at the HLA-DR locus was associated with an increased risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that HLA mismatch is not a significant predictor of survival in the modern era. Overall, the clinical implications of this study provide reassuring data for the continued use of non-HLA-matched donors in an effort to increase the donor pool. If HLA matching is to be considered for heart transplant donor-recipient selection, matching at the HLA-DR locus should take priority due to its association with cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Adequacy of Size Matching With Predicted Heart Mass Ratio in Diverse Types of Cardiomyopathies.

Predicted heart mass ratio (PHMr) has been proposed as an optimal size metric in the selection of a donor heart for transplant; however, it is not known if the same size matching criteria pertains uniformly to all types of cardiomyopathies. Heart transplant recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry database were categorized into 6 groups based on the type of cardiomyopathy, dilated, coronary artery disease, hypertrophic, restrictive, valvular and adult congenital heart disease. Patients in each group of etiology were stratified based on the PHMr into 5 groups: severely undersized <0.86, moderately undersized 0.86 to 0.94, matched 0.95 to 1.04, moderately oversized 1.05 to 1.24, and severely oversized >1.25. The survival and cause of death of patients in each etiology group were reviewed. The United Network for Organ Sharing registry database from January 1987 to July 2021 included 53,573 patients who received a heart transplant. Compared with patients with size matched hearts, recipients with dilated (hazard ratio 1.17, p = 0.001) and valvular (hazard ratio 1.79, p = 0.032) cardiomyopathy who had an undersized heart with PHMr <0.86 had decreased survival. In addition, the survival of patients with hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy and adult congenital heart disease was not affected by size matching based on the PHMr (0.601 and 0.079, respectively, p = 0.873). In conclusion, our analysis suggests that the size matching criteria based on PHMr may not be uniform to all patients across various etiologies of cardiomyopathy. Therefore, the data can be used to increase the acceptance rate of donor hearts, particularly, for patients with hypertrophic, restrictive cardiomyopathy and congenital heart disease in which size matching is less significant for survival outcome.

Lung transplant survival with past and concomitant cardiac revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease is common among lung transplant (LTx) candidates and has historically been viewed as a contraindication to the procedure. Survival outcomes of lung transplant recipients with concomitant coronary artery disease who had prior or perioperative revascularization remain a topic of conversation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all single and double lung transplant patients from Feb, 2012 to Aug, 2021 at a single center was performed (n = 880). Patients were split into 4 groups: (1) those who received a preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention, (2) those who received preoperative coronary artery bypass grafting, (3) those who received coronary artery bypass grafting during transplantation, and (4) those who had lung transplantation without revascularization. Groups were compared for demographics, surgical procedure, and survival outcomes using STATA Inc. A p value< 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Most patients receiving LTx were male and white. Pump type (p = 0.810), total ischemic time (p = 0.994), warm ischemic time (p = 0.479), length of stay (p = 0.751), and lung allocation score (p = 0.332) were not significantly different between the four groups. The no revascularization group was younger than the other groups (p<0.01). The diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis was predominant in all groups except the no revascularization group. The pre-coronary artery bypass grafting group had a higher portion of single LTx procedures (p = 0.014). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significantly different survival rates after post-LTx between the groups (p = 0.471). Cox Regression analysis showed diagnosis significantly impacted survival rates (p 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative or intraoperative revascularization did not affect survival outcomes in lung transplant patients. Selected patients with coronary artery disease may benefit when intervened during lung transplant procedures.

Impact of donor ventricular function on heart transplantation outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Some heart transplant (HTx) centers have expanded their donor eligibility criteria in response to the organ shortage; one area of active interest involves utilizing hearts with ventricular dysfunction. Our study seeks to identify if a relationship exists between donor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ischemic time or donor age on HTx outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on adult patients who had a HTx between 1996 and 2021 (n = 46,936). Donor LVEF (dLVEF) values were categorized into three groups: <50%, 50%-70%, and >70%. Ischemic time and donor age were stratified into four groups: ≤2.0, 2.1-3.0, 3.1-4.0, >4.0 h, and ≤30, 31-40, 41-50, >50 years, respectively. The outcome of interest was long-term survival. RESULTS: Multivariable survival analysis found a slight increase in overall mortality risk for patients with donor ejection fractions <50% (HR = 1.16, p = .013). However, subsequent subgroup investigation discovered that this elevated hazard was only applicable when ischemic time was prolonged to >3.0 h (3.1-4.0 h: HR = 1.23, p = .024; > 4.0 h: HR = 1.52, p < .001). There was no significant difference in survival between dLVEF groups when ischemic time was limited to ≤3.0 h or when stratified by donor age. CONCLUSION: HTx patients with a low donor ejection fraction have comparable survival to recipients with a normal dLVEF when ischemic time is limited to ≤3.0 h. Reduced dLVEF does not appear to be sensitive to advanced donor age. The clinical implications of our study may encourage the recruitment of more donor hearts for transplantation.

Red Blood Cell Transfusion Prior to Lung Transplantation: Impact on Patient Outcomes.

There is an established association between red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and increased mortality and morbidity in cardiac surgery; however, there is little data demonstrating the influence of blood transfusion while awaiting lung transplantation. Therefore, our study compared the impact of pretransplant RBC transfusion on patient survival and post-transplantation adverse events. Adult lung transplant patient data were extracted retrospectively using the United Network for Organ Sharing thoracic database. Patients were stratified into two groups based on pretransplant transfusion status. In total, 28,217 patients were analyzed in our study (transfused: n = 1,415 and not transfused: n = 26,802). There was an increasing trend in pretransplant transfusion rates from 2006 to 2020. Transfused patients had a higher incidence of adverse events post-transplantation, including dialysis, stroke, and acute organ rejection before discharge. Multivariable survival analysis found an increased mortality risk in patients who required pretransplant transfusion(s) compared to those who did not have a transfusion (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.41; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome development between groups (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.82-1.04; p = 0.185). To conclude, our study provides data to suggest that RBC transfusion(s) before lung transplantation are associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality, but have no association with chronic graft rejection development.

Size matching in combined heart-lung transplant: An undersized predicted heart mass is associated with increased mortality.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have analyzed the consequences of donor-recipient organ size mismatch within both heart and lung transplantation. However, there is very little data on size matching in combined heart-lung transplantation (HLTx). We reviewed how donor/recipient predicted total lung capacity (pTLC), predicted heart mass (pHM), weight, and height ratios affect HLTx survival and graft rejection outcome. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on adult HLTx patients using the UNOS database. Overall survival at 1- and 5-years, as well as 5-years bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and coronary artery vasculopathy (CAV) development, were the outcomes of interest. Each sizing modality was split into 5 groups for survival analysis and 3 groups for graft rejection analysis based on an approximately equal size-matched reference group. RESULTS: In total, 747 patients were analyzed in our study. Of the 4 sizing modalities, only pHM ratio had a significant difference in acute and long-term survival. In particular, a severely undersized pHMr of < 83% was associated with an increased risk of mortality compared to an approximately equally sized match (1-year: HR=1.95, 95% CI=1.30-2.91, p = 0.001; 5-year: HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.05-2.06, p = 0.027). No sizing metric was predictive of BOS or CAV development. CONCLUSION: Our analysis supports the use of pHM ratio for size matching in HLTx. Based on our results, a donor/recipient pHM ratio of >83% should be achieved to minimize mortality risk associated with sizing mismatch.

Human leukocyte antigen mismatch on lung transplantation outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch is a known risk factor for renal transplantation; however, there are conflicting and limited data on its ramifications within lung transplantation (LTx). Therefore, our study evaluated the effects of total HLA, HLA-A, -B and -DR mismatches on LTx outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the United Network for Organ Sharing database for adult patients who had undergone LTx for the first time between January 2005 and July 2021. Total HLA mismatch (0-3, 4, 5 and 6) and HLA locus mismatch (0-1 and 2) were analysed, with the end points of interest being mortality and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) development. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier curve analysis found a significant difference in both overall survival (n = 27 651; 11 830 events) and BOS development (n = 25 444; 8901 events) for the total number of HLA (P < 0.001, P < 0.001), HLA-A (P < 0.001, P = 0.006) and HLA-DR (P < 0.001, P < 0.001) mismatches. With reference to 0-3 total HLA mismatches, multivariable Cox regression model found that 6 mismatches had an increased risk of mortality (P = 0.002) while 4 (P = 0.010), 5 (P = 0.007) and 6 (P < 0.001) mismatches had an increased risk of BOS. HLA-B mismatch was not associated with an increased mortality (P = 0.975) or BOS risk (P = 0.512). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significant relationship between increased HLA mismatches and BOS development, with decreased overall survival only apparent with 6 mismatches. HLA-A and -DR mismatches were associated with an increased risk of mortality and BOS development compared to groups with at least 1 locus match.