Clinical utility of the ASDAS index in comparison with BASDAI in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (Axis Study).

The objective of the study was to study the clinical utility of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) for the assessment of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, compared to the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index (BASDAI). This was a prospective longitudinal observational study in patients with AS (NY-modified criteria) from 23 Spanish centers. Physical and analytical data; global, lumbar, and nocturnal pain; ASDAS, BASDAI and minimally acceptable clinical status (PASS) were collected. Psychometric characteristics of both indexes were analyzed: construct validity (convergent and divergent), discriminant capacity, criterion validity (global physician and patient assessment), and sensitivity to change. The study involved 127 patients (19.7% attrition). Both BASDAI and ASDAS showed a higher correlation with patient's global assessment (r = 0.76 and 0.70, respectively) than with physician's global assessment (r = 0.67 and 0.57). Both scores allowed discriminating patients with an acceptable clinical status, although BASDAI to a greater extent than ASDAS (Cohen δ 1.72 vs 0.88 for the medical PASS). Both scores showed sensitivity to change in patients who changed from an unacceptable symptomatic state to acceptable according to PASS criteria (physician and patient) and by BASDAI 50 response criteria (Cohen δ > 0.80). BASDAI showed better criterion validity than ASDAS, both for the patient PASS (AUC 0.85 vs 0.79) and for the physician's (AUC 0.90 vs 0.79). ASDAS shows adequate performance for disease activity in patients with AS; however, in this study, its psychometric properties do not present advantages over BASDAI in terms of criterion validity, sensitivity to change or discriminative capacity; replacement of BASDAI by ASDAS is not supported by the data.

Less lipoatrophy and better lipid profile with abacavir as compared to stavudine: 96-week results of a randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess lipoatrophy, other toxicities, and efficacy associated with abacavir as compared with stavudine in HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, open trial, stratified by viral load and CD4 cell count, conducted January 2001 to July 2004. Two hundred thirty-seven adult patients with HIV infection initiating antiretroviral therapy were assigned to receive abacavir (n = 115) or stavudine (n = 122), both combined with lamivudine and efavirenz. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with lipoatrophy as assessed by physician and patient observation at 96 weeks. RESULTS: A lower proportion of patients assigned to abacavir developed clinical signs of lipoatrophy (4.8% vs. 38.3%; P < 0.001). These observations were confirmed by anthropometric data. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans performed in 57 patients showed significantly greater total limb fat loss in the stavudine arm (-1579 vs. 913 g; P < 0.001). The lipid profile in abacavir patients presented more favorable changes in the levels of triglycerides (P = 0.03), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc; P < 0.001), and apolipoprotein A1 (P < 0.001) as well as in the ratio between total cholesterol and HDLc (P = 0.005). Throughout the study, a higher proportion of patients in the stavudine group received lipid-lowering agents as compared to the abacavir group (17% vs. 4%; P = 0.002). Similar virologic and immunologic responses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming the limitations inherent to clinical assessment, this study shows a notably weaker association of abacavir with lipoatrophy than stavudine. DEXA scans and anthropometric measurements supported the clinical findings. In addition, the lipid changes that occurred were more favorable in patients receiving abacavir.

Switching strategies to improve lipid profile and morphologic changes.

Metabolic alterations and body fat changes are well-recognized limitations of protease inhibitor-based regimens. Strategies of replacing protease inhibitors with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or abacavir have been shown to improve metabolic abnormalities, particularly by decreasing cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and reducing cardiovascular risk. The various therapeutic options show differences in efficacy, tolerability, and metabolic outcomes. Abacavir seems to be better tolerated, at least in the only randomized trial in which the three options were compared face-to-face, but it is associated with higher virologic failure in patients with prior suboptimal nucleoside therapy. Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, particularly nevirapine, result in a better lipid profile with a greater increase in HDL cholesterol and in the HDUtotal cholesterol ratio, one of the most important parameters associated with a reduction in cardiovascular risk. Efavirenz has been associated with increased triglyceride levels in some studies. Although protease inhibitor compounds as a family have been linked to metabolic and body fat alterations, new drugs such as atazanavir seem to be associated with a more favorable lipid profile. Lipoatrophy is a stigmatizing complication in HIV-infected patients receiving HAART. There is strong evidence suggesting a prominent role of thymidine analogs, mainly stavudine, in its development. Substitution of stavudine or zidovudine for abacavir or tenofovir partially improves peripheral fat loss. In addition, the lipid profile significantly improves. Finally, although the extended use of non-thymidine nucleoside analogs and the development of new families of antiretroviral drugs will probably result in a lower impact in lipids and morphologic changes, many patients are currently under treatment with these compounds. In this setting, switching strategies may be useful to minimize clinical and psychological consequences, improving the quality of life of HIV-infected patients treated with HAART.

Metabolic benefits 24 months after replacing a protease inhibitor with abacavir, efavirenz or nevirapine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 24-month metabolic and morphological benefits obtained from replacing the protease inhibitor (PI) in a regimen with nevirapine, efavirenz or abacavir. DESIGN AND METHODS: NEFA was a randomized study designed to compare the efficacy of nevirapine, efavirenz or abacavir as substitutes for PI. A subset of 90 patients [abacavir (n = 29), efavirenz (n = 32), nevirapine (n = 29)] formed the metabolic study. Fasting total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and triglycerides levels were determined. Glucose homeostasis parameters were also collected. Lipodystrophy was evaluated by clinical examination and morphological measurements. RESULTS: Treatment simplification led to overall lipid profile improvements. At 24 months, the two non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors produced similar lipid benefits: HDL-c levels increased [efavirenz, 15% (P = 0.001); nevirapine, 21% (P < 0.001)] and TC to HDL-c ratios decreased [efavirenz, 14% (P < 0.001); nevirapine, 19% (P < 0.01)], an effect not observed in the abacavir arm. Non-HDL-c levels decreased by 10% in both the abacavir (P = 0.001) and efavirenz (P < 0.05) arms. Significant decreases in the levels of triglycerides occurred for the first year in all treatments; however, at 24 months most of the initial loss had been regained. Patients with baseline moderate or severe lipodystrophy obtained less-pronounced lipid benefits. Several insulin resistance markers showed a trend towards improvement. Conversely, no improvements in morphological abnormalities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Replacing PI with efavirenz, nevirapine or abacavir improved the lipid profile, with more marked results in non-lipodystrophic patients. In contrast, this strategy does not seem to be effective for reversing body fat abnormalities.

Orotic aciduria and plasma urea cycle-related amino acid alterations in short bowel syndrome, evoked by an arginine-free diet.

BACKGROUND: The small bowel is believed to play a crucial role in endogenous arginine synthesis. Therefore, an insufficient arginine supply in the situation of massive intestinal resection might impede normal arginine metabolism. This study sought to determine the clinical and metabolic effects of an arginine-free diet in stable short-bowel patients. METHODS: Four patients, mean age 49 years (range: 26-67), mean time from intestinal resection 46 m (range: 15-97), and remnant small bowel of 30 to 100 cm consumed an L-amino acid arginine-free diet (egg pattern) for 5 days (0.9 g protein equivalent/kg/d plus malabsorption adjustments). Fasting plasma amino acids, ammonium, and blood chemistries were assessed at days 0, 3, and 5. Urinary orotate, orotidine, uric acid, urea, creatinine, and total nitrogen were evaluated daily. RESULTS: Significant decreases in plasma levels of arginine, ornithine, and hydroxyproline occurred at day 5. A decreasing trend in plasma citrulline and a significant plasma glutamine increase were also observed in the same period. Conversely, ammonium concentrations remained normal. Regarding urine compounds, striking orotic aciduria with a peak at day 4 (14-fold vs baseline) and significant decreases in uric acid and urea excretion were found. There were no relevant clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited number of patients in our work and their relative heterogeneity, our results support the idea of the indispensability of an exogenous arginine supply in humans under short bowel syndrome conditions. Studies in larger series are needed to further investigate these findings.

A comparison of the effects of nevirapine and nelfinavir on metabolism and body habitus in antiretroviral-naive human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: a randomized controlled study.

New HIV therapies have significantly increased survival, but are associated with multiple metabolic changes, most of them related to the protease inhibitors (PIs). The objective of this study was to elucidate and compare morphological and metabolic alterations in HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive patients receiving two nucleosides plus the PI nelfinavir (NFV) or the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor nevirapine (NVP). Forty-three patients (NFV, n = 20; NVP, n = 23) receiving 6-12 months of treatment were analyzed. Morphological changes were evaluated by bioelectrical impedance analysis, standard anthropometrics, and clinical examination. Serum total cholesterol (TC), low-density and high- density (HDL-c) lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, and insulin were determined, among other metabolic parameters. No baseline differences were observed between groups. TC increased in both arms (NVP, 11%; NFV, 17%). HDL-c also increased in both groups, although more markedly in those receiving NVP (44% vs. 20%); on-treatment levels were also elevated (1.57 vs. 1.28 mmol/liter). As a consequence of these changes, the TC/HDL-c ratio dropped by 22% in the NVP arm and remained stable in the NFV group. With the use of NFV, the TC/HDL-c ratio and attendant cardiovascular risk did not change. In contrast, NVP offered benefits regarding lipid status, as manifested by enhanced HDL-c concentrations and decreased TC/HDL-c ratios. Inclusion of NVP should be considered when deciding upon antiretroviral regimens for patients at high coronary risk.