RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity, reproducibility, and feasibility of the "Color Vision Evaluation Test" (CVET) for the diagnosis of congenital dyschromatopsia. DESIGN: Prospective, monocentric, sensitivity, and specificity analysis study comparing the CVET with the Farnsworth 15 Hue standard test (15 Hue STF). METHODS: A total of 155 children from the Paediatric University Hospital of Nice were screened (both eyes) using Ishihara's pseudoisochromatic cards, which allowed dividing them into a dyschromatic group and a control group. All children underwent twice the 15 Hue STF and the CVET with at least 7 days between both series of tests. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 7.56 ± 3.51 years in the dyschromatic group and 8.92 ± 2.9 years in the control group. At the first evaluation, the sensitivity and specificity were 95.7% and 96.4%, respectively, for the CVET and 75% and 58.9%, respectively, for the 15 Hue STF (P < .001). The reproducibility of the CVET was 100%, whereas that of the 15 Hue STF was 88.4% (P = .01). The mean test explanation duration was 18.8 seconds for the CVET and 17.7 seconds for the 15 Hue STF (P = .3). In the dyschromatic group, the mean duration of the CVET was always significantly longer than that of the 15 Hue STF (P < .001). The children subjectively preferred to undergo the CVET rather than the 15 Hue STF in 84.6% of cases (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The CVET is a rapid, reliable, and reproducible test for the diagnosis of congenital dyschromatopsia. It is accessible to young children.
