Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
2.
Am J Ther ; 15 Suppl 10: S20-2; discussion S22-3, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19127125

RESUMO

Payers and clinicians share a commitment to successful clinical outcomes in patients with acute or chronic pain. However, there are several issues that concern payers and managed care plans, including the cost of therapy and the cost of treating side effects. This article reviews the economic implications of pain management and the need to provide care in a clinically and economically responsible way. The article also addresses the value of medications to patients, the need for more judicious use of very expensive medications, and the use of evidence-based treatment guidelines.


Assuntos
Analgésicos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/economia , Dor , Doença Aguda , Analgésicos/economia , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/economia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Custos e Análise de Custo , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase/economia , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 14(12): 869-75, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15818636

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Recent research suggests that letters to healthcare providers may not effectively communicate safety-related information. This study examined whether content, organization, and formatting of dear doctor letters (DDLs) influences physicians' responses to the letters. METHODS: Drugs with warning label changes during 2000 and 2001 were identified, and corresponding DDLs were obtained. Letters were coded for content, organization, and formatting. Ten physicians rated letters on presentation, criticalness of the information, and likelihood of changing practice as a result of the letter. Areas of deficiency were identified. The relationships between key characteristics of the letters and physicians' ratings were examined using correlations; reliability of physicians' ratings was estimated using generalizability theory. RESULTS: For 2000 and 2001, 124 drugs were identified as having had changes to the warning section of the label; DDLs were sent in 32 (25.8%) instances. Letters varied in terms of the placement of key information, use of formatting, and length. Physicians' ratings suggested 25% of the letters were deficient in clarity, 28% in readability, 36% in the ratio of relevant information to supporting information, 36% in key information easily discernable, and 28% in overall effectiveness of communication. Letters with formatting highlighting key information were preferred. Letter length and placement of key information were not correlated with physicians' ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Many DDLs do not communicate labeling changes clearly and effectively. If DDLs are used to communicate safety information to physicians, special formatting and explicit wording should be used to emphasize new information.


Assuntos
Correspondência como Assunto , Rotulagem de Medicamentos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Indústria Farmacêutica , Humanos , Médicos
7.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 11(6): 492-8, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15299000

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine various strategies for the identification of adverse drug events (ADEs) among older persons in the ambulatory clinical setting. DESIGN: A cohort study of Medicare enrollees (n = 31,757 per month) receiving medical care from a large multispecialty group practice during a 12-month observation period (July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000). MEASUREMENTS: Possible drug-related incidents occurring in the ambulatory clinical setting were detected using signals from multiple sources. RESULTS: During the tracking period, there were 1,523 identified ADEs, of which 421 (28%) were considered preventable. Across all sources, 23,917 signals were found; 12,791 (53%) were potential incidents that led to review of a patient's medical record and 2,266 (9%) were presented to physician reviewers. Although the positive predictive value (PPV) for reports from providers was high compared with other sources (54%), only 11% of the ADEs and 6% of the preventable ADEs were identified through this source. PPVs for other sources ranged from a low of 4% for administrative incident reports to a high of 12% for free-text review of electronic notes. Computer-generated signals were the source for 31% of the ADEs and 37% of the preventable ADEs. Electronic notes were the source for 39% of the ADEs and 29% of the preventable ADEs. There was little overlap in the ADEs identified across all sources. CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the limitations of voluntary reporting by health care providers as the principal means for detection of ADEs and suggest that multiple strategies are required to detect ADEs in geriatric ambulatory patients.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Erros de Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Humanos , Prontuários Médicos , Medicare , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , New England
8.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 52(8): 1349-54, 2004 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15271125

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To gather information on patient-level factors associated with risk of adverse drug events (ADEs) that may allow focus of prevention efforts on patients at high risk. DESIGN: Nested case-control study. SETTING: Large multispecialty group practice in New England. PARTICIPANTS: All Medicare enrollees cared for by a multispecialty group practice during 1 year (N=30,397 person-years from July 1, 1999, through June 30, 2000). For each patient with an ADE, a control was randomly selected. MEASUREMENTS: Data were abstracted from medical records on age, sex, comorbidities, and medication use at the time of the event. RESULTS: ADEs were identified in 1,299 older adults. Independent risk factors included being female and aged 80 and older. There were dose-response associations with the Charlson Comorbidity Index and number of scheduled medications. Patients taking anticoagulants, antidepressants, antibiotics, cardiovascular drugs, diuretics, hormones, and corticosteroids were at increased risk. In the analysis of preventable ADEs, the dose-response relationship with comorbidity and number of medications remained. Patients taking nonopioid analgesics (predominantly nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and acetaminophen), anticoagulants, diuretics, and anti-seizure medications were at increased risk. CONCLUSION: Prevention efforts to reduce ADEs should be targeted toward older adults with multiple medical conditions or taking multiple medications, nonopioid analgesics, anticoagulants, diuretics, and antiseizure medications.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Diuréticos/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais
9.
JAMA ; 289(9): 1107-16, 2003 Mar 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12622580

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Adverse drug events, especially those that may be preventable, are among the most serious concerns about medication use in older persons cared for in the ambulatory clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory clinical setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Cohort study of all Medicare enrollees (30 397 person-years of observation) cared for by a multispecialty group practice during a 12-month study period (July 1, 1999, through June 30, 2000), in which possible drug-related incidents occurring in the ambulatory clinical setting were detected using multiple methods, including reports from health care providers; review of hospital discharge summaries; review of emergency department notes; computer-generated signals; automated free-text review of electronic clinic notes; and review of administrative incident reports concerning medication errors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of adverse drug events, severity of the events (classified as significant, serious, life-threatening, or fatal), and whether the events were preventable. RESULTS: There were 1523 identified adverse drug events, of which 27.6% (421) were considered preventable. The overall rate of adverse drug events was 50.1 per 1000 person-years, with a rate of 13.8 preventable adverse drug events per 1000 person-years. Of the adverse drug events, 578 (38.0%) were categorized as serious, life-threatening, or fatal; 244 (42.2%) of these more severe events were deemed preventable compared with 177 (18.7%) of the 945 significant adverse drug events. Errors associated with preventable adverse drug events occurred most often at the stages of prescribing (n = 246, 58.4%) and monitoring (n = 256, 60.8%), and errors involving patient adherence (n = 89, 21.1%) also were common. Cardiovascular medications (24.5%), followed by diuretics (22.1%), nonopioid analgesics (15.4%), hypoglycemics (10.9%), and anticoagulants (10.2%) were the most common medication categories associated with preventable adverse drug events. Electrolyte/renal (26.6%), gastrointestinal tract (21.1%), hemorrhagic (15.9%), metabolic/endocrine (13.8%), and neuropsychiatric (8.6%) events were the most common types of preventable adverse drug events. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse drug events are common and often preventable among older persons in the ambulatory clinical setting. More serious adverse drug events are more likely to be preventable. Prevention strategies should target the prescribing and monitoring stages of pharmaceutical care. Interventions focused on improving patient adherence with prescribed regimens and monitoring of prescribed medications also may be beneficial.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Tratamento Farmacológico/normas , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Prática de Grupo/normas , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Feminino , Prática de Grupo/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Medicare Part B , Medicare Part C , Erros de Medicação , New England/epidemiologia , Preparações Farmacêuticas/classificação , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...