Telerehabilitation has similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes compared to traditional rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Telehealth rehabilitation (telerehab) is an increasingly popular cost-saving alternative to traditional rehabilitation after total joint arthroplasty. We compared the safety and efficacy of an institutional telerehab program to conventional "face-to-face" rehabilitation in a sample of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was performed. Medicare patients who utilized telerehab following unilateral TKA were matched in a 1:3 ratio to those utilizing conventional rehabilitation. Patients were matched on sex, body mass index (BMI, ± 5 kg/m2), preoperative extension (± 10 degrees), preoperative flexion (± 10 degrees), and Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) score (± 2 points). Ninety-day unplanned healthcare encounters, 120-day manipulations under anesthesia (MUAs), and 6-week and 3-month changes in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR), pain visual analog scale (VAS), Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12), and Lower-Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Eighty-two telerehab patients and 244 conventional rehab patients were included. After matching, there were no differences in 90-day unplanned healthcare encounters or 120-day MUA rates between groups. There were no differences in 6-week or 3-month changes in KOOS-JR, VAS pain, or VR-12 mental or physical sub-scores between groups. Telerehab patients had a greater improvement in LEAS score at 3 months compared to the conventional group (mean difference 1.9, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In a matched cohort study of 326 TKA patients, telerehab patients had similar rates of unplanned healthcare encounters and MUAs and similar patient-reported outcomes compared to conventional PT patients, suggesting that telerehab can be an equally effective alternative to conventional PT following TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Patients with Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Have Become Higher Risk.

BACKGROUND: Independent risk factors such as age, loss of consciousness, elevated serum creatinine, low hemoglobin, and electrocardiogram evidence of ischemia have previously been shown to predict mortality after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). With an aging Australian population, we sought to determine if patients presenting with rAAA now had more predictive risk factors for mortality and whether these factors remain predictive of mortality. METHODS: The records of all patients presenting with rAAA between January 1985 to December 1993 (past era, group 1) and January 2007 to December 2011 (modern era, group 2) were retrieved. A database of independent risk factors, repair method, and mortality was constructed. Comparisons were made between the 2 groups, where a P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Hundred and eighty-eight patients presented with rAAA in the past era, of which 154 were then prepared for repair. 60 patients presented in the modern group, in which 38 patients were then prepared for repair. Proportionally, more patients in the modern era group were rejected for surgery compared to the past era group, (22/60 vs. 34/188; P = 0.004) Rejection was based on both medical comorbidities as well as patient/family and surgeon preferences. The in-hospital mortality rate for patients undergoing repair remained unchanged between the groups at 39%. Age was the only predictive factor that differed between the modern and past era groups (median age: 81 vs. 72 respectively, P < 0.001). However, this equated to more risk factors per patient in the modern group compared to the past era (2 vs. 1, respectively, P < 0.001). When stratified by 0, 1, 2, and 3 + risk factors present, there was a trend toward lower mortality in the modern group per strata. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the risk factors in the modern group demonstrated that low blood hemoglobin was the only risk factor independently predictive of mortality in the modern group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the modern era group are older and presenting with more predictive risk factors for mortality after rAAA. This has seen an increased rate of rejection for surgery. However, mortality rates following rAAA repair remain unchanged. These results suggest that the previously identified predictive risk factors need to be adjusted.

Carotid redo surgery: both safe and durable.

AIM: To examine the outcomes and complications of surgery for recurrent carotid stenosis. METHODS: From 1974 to 2000, 1922 carotid endarterectomies were performed in our unit. A retrospective cohort analysis of these records identified 24 patients (1.2%) who underwent surgery for recurrent stenosis. RESULTS: There were 13 men and 11 women in the group. Median follow up was 7.2 years (interquartile range 4.4-12.4 years). The indication for redo surgery was either symptomatic severe (80-99%) or moderate (50-79%) restenosis, or severe asymptomatic (80-99%) restenosis. Repair was performed by patch angioplasty (88%), endarterectomy alone (8%) or interposition grafting (4%). Within the 30 day perioperative period there were no deaths, no strokes (major or minor), or significant cardiac morbidity. One patient (4%) developed a permanent spinal accessory nerve deficit. Another patient (4%) required further re-intervention for recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS: Very low surgical morbidity and mortality was achieved in our unit by implementing a policy of selective re-intervention for carotid restenosis. Redo carotid endarterectomy can therefore be recommended as having no greater morbidity than primary carotid endarterectomy. Carotid angioplasty and stenting are not recommended as a routine alternative treatment.

Preoperative cardiac assessment for patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a survey of current practice by vascular surgeons in New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory.

BACKGROUND: The reported mortality rate following open elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) varies between 0 and 12%. Much of the mortality and major morbidity is caused by cardiac events. The evidence regarding best practice for cardiac assessment and optimization of this patient group is unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate current practice of cardiac risk factor assessment by vascular surgeons in New South Wales (NSW) and Australian Capital Territory (ACT) for patients undergoing open elective repair of infrarenal AAA. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to 46 surgeons in NSW and ACT identified as expressing a principal or major interest in vascular surgery. If no response was received within 3 weeks, a second questionnaire was sent and if no response was received after the second mailing, a telephone survey of non-responders was conducted. Data were collated regarding the importance of risk factors elicited by clinical history, preoperative investigation, referral for cardiological opinion, use of perioperative beta-blockade and the timing of aortic surgery in relation to coronary artery revascularization and acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 87% (40/46) and the median (range) response time was 14 (4-109) days. Only 22 of 40 and 23 of 40 surgeons consider diabetes mellitus or renal impairment, respectively, to be important when assessing cardiac risk and 34 of 40 surgeons do not employ a validated risk index in preoperative assessment. Sixteen of 40 surgeons refer all patients needing AAA repair to a cardiologist, while 24 of 40 would initiate cardiac investigations themselves (either stress electrocardiography, scintigraphy or echocardiography). Seventeen surgeons always or usually commenced perioperative beta-blockade with wide variations in the commencement (1 to > 28 days preoperatively) and duration (< 1 week to > 28 days postoperatively) of treatment. The timing of AAA repair following coronary revascularization ranged from < 1 week to 6 months and delay in surgical repair of AAA following myocardial infarction ranged from < 1 week to > 6 months. CONCLUSION: Preoperative assessment of cardiac risk in patients for repair of AAA lacks consensus among vascular surgeons in NSW and ACT. The diversity of clinical practice may rest with the paucity of prospective trials published in the medical literature or the influence of local institutional facilities.