Real-world dostarlimab use in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer in France.

INTRODUCTION: In October 2020, the French Health Authority granted early access outside of the clinical trial setting for dostarlimab, a programmed death-1 inhibitor. Dostarlimab was approved by the European Medicines Agency (in April 2021) as monotherapy for patients with post-platinum mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer, based on the results of the GARNET trial (NCT02715284). METHODS: This was a real-world descriptive analysis of patients granted cohort temporary authorization of use to receive dostarlimab between November 2020 and June 2021. Physicians could complete follow-up forms at each treatment cycle to provide clinical information, safety, and efficacy data. Safety and disease progression data were also captured through pharmacovigilance reports. RESULTS: Of 95 temporary authorization of use requests made by 80 oncologists in 59 French hospitals, 87 patients were eligible, and 80 received≥1 dose of dostarlimab. Based on treatment response assessments received (n=43), the mean (standard deviation) time from treatment initiation to response evaluation was 11 (6) weeks. The disease control rate (complete plus partial responses plus stable disease rates) was 56% (n=24/43), and the overall response rate was 35% (n=15/43); both consistent with those reported in the GARNET trial. No new safety signals were reported. DISCUSSION: The enrolment of 80 patients in an 8-month period highlights the need for access to novel treatment regimens in France for these patients post-platinum. Prospective randomized studies are ongoing to assess the efficacy and safety of dostarlimab and other checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment in patients with endometrial cancer.

Optimal First-Line Medico-Surgical Strategy in Ovarian Cancers: Are We There Yet?

In spite of tremendous advances in advanced ovarian cancer management through the past decade, notably owing to surgical expertise and novel combination molecules (including bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors), the optimal initial sequential strategy remains a major concern. Indeed, following seminal clinical trials, primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) followed by adjuvant systemic therapy and interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have been positioned as validated alternatives with distinct pros and cons, although a definite response is still unassessed. In clinical practice, decisions between PCS and ICS rely on multilayer parameters: the tumor itself, the patient, and the health structure. In this state-of-the-art review, we will discuss the current evidence based on clinical trials and real-world data and highlight the remaining questions, including the fittest positioning of PCS vs. ICS and the optimal number of NACT cycles; subsequently, we will discuss current axes of research such as dedicated clinical trials and more global perspectives. These ongoing strategies and perspectives could contribute to improving the patient journey through personalized medicine.

Quality of Life with Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies have improved the prognosis for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancers (la/mUC) but little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with this mode of treatment. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of changes in HRQoL global health and domain scores in patients with la/mUC receiving mAb therapies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: MEDLINE and the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meeting databases were searched from January 2015 to June 18, 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data were updated on February 3, 2023. Eligible studies were prospective trials assessing HRQoL in patients with la/mUC treated with mAbs. Patients treated for local disease or with radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone were excluded. Meta-analyses, reviews, and case reports were excluded. The validity of randomized trials was assessed using the Risk-of-Bias-2 (RoB2) tool and the strength of outcome evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The data were analyzed via qualitative synthesis of the evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of the 1066 studies identified, nine were included (2364 patients); eight were interventional trials and one was an observational study. The mean change in global health score ranged from -2.8 to 1.9. Constipation, fatigue and pain symptoms, and emotional, physical, role and social functioning improved with treatment in at least two studies. No study demonstrated a significant improvement in global health score. Eight studies reported stability. In the RANGE trial, the global health score decreased. Only two studies had high internal validity according to RoB2 assessment. The HRQoL domain certainty was low, with moderate certainty only for the pain symptom domain. Disease- and treatment-related symptoms, tumor shrinkage, and disease recurrence were correlated to HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Patient HRQoL with mAb therapies for la/mUC did not worsen over time. HRQoL is influenced by several factors related to treatment, tumor characteristics, and the patient's health condition. Evidence was moderate at best and further studies are needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed the evidence on health-related quality-of-life for patients with advanced bladder cancer treated with antibody therapies. We found that quality of life does not worsen on treatment, and sometimes improves. We conclude that these treatments do not negatively affect quality of life, but further studies are needed to draw solid conclusions.

[Combination strategies for checkpoint inhibition: Current practices and perspectives]. / Combinaisons d'inhibiteurs de points de contrôle immunitaires en oncologie : état de l'art et perspectives.

T-cell checkpoint blockade therapies have revolutionized treatment protocols and prognosis in patients with cancer. Pointed out by the success of PD-1 (programmed cell death-1) plus CTLA-4 (cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4) blockade in patients with melanoma, the perspective of new synergistic immunotherapy combinations seems to be an important opportunity to improve outcomes for patients. In this article, we first focus on immunotherapy combinations that have shown their efficiency and that are currently approved in solid tumors. Then, we present a summary of emerging targets with reported pre-clinical efficacy and currently evaluated through ongoing clinical trials and other immunomodulatory molecules in the tumor microenvironment.

Optimal timing of interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A retrospective study from the ESME national cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Interval debulking surgery is recommended after 3-4 cycles (standard IDS) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) not able to received upfront complete debulking surgery. However, real world practices frequently report performing IDS after ≥5 NAC cycles (delayed IDS). The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact on survival of the number of NACT cycles before IDS. METHODS: We identified from a French national database, women with newly diagnosed EOC who underwent IDS from January 2011 to December 2016. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using Cox model with adjustments for confounding factors provided by two propensity score methods: inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and matched-pair analysis. RESULTS: 928 patients treated by IDS for which our propensity score could be applied were identified. After a median follow-up of 49.0 months (95% CI [46.0;52.9]); from the IPTW analysis, median PFS was 17.6 months and 11.5 months (HR = 1.42; CI 95% [1.22-1.67]; p < 0.0001); median OS was 51.2 months and 44.3 months (HR = 1.29; CI 95% [1.06-1.56]; p = 0.0095) for the standard and delayed IDS groups. From the matched-pair analysis (comparing 352 patients for each group), standard IDS was associated with better PFS (HR = 0,77; CI 95% [0.65-0.90]; p = 0.018) but not significantly associated with better OS (HR = 0,84; CI 95% [0.68-1,03]; p = 0.0947). CONCLUSIONS: Carrying IDS after ≥5 NACT cycles seems to have a negative effect on patients survival. The goal of IDS surgery is complete resection and should not be performed after >3-4 NACT cycles.

Health-related quality of life analysis in ovarian cancer clinical trials involving PARP inhibitors: a critical methodological perspective.

The poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have yielded significant clinical benefits as maintenance therapy in women with newly diagnosed and relapsed platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer. These drugs were approved based on progression-free survival, the primary endpoint of their respective pivotal trials. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and/or patient-reported outcomes were included in these trials as a secondary exploratory endpoint. Nevertheless, many weaknesses in the analysis of HRQoL across these trials can be noticed. Heterogeneity and suboptimal HRQoL analysis in oncology trials contribute to misconceptions about this endpoint among oncologists and prevent quality of life as being an endpoint used for approvals. In this article, we discuss these HRQoL results from a methodological perspective and propose some solutions for improvement that could be used by regulatory and academic institutions running ovarian cancers trials. Notably, we suggest to measure and analyze HRQoL data after disease progression, to focus dedicated papers on the statistical analyses of HRQoL recommended by the SISAQOL consortium (linear mixed model for repeated measures and time-to-event approaches) and to communicate on available guidelines to ensure compliance with best international practices regarding the measurement and analysis of HRQoL.

Pharmacokinetic Variability Drives Palbociclib-Induced Neutropenia in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Drug-Drug Interactions Are the Usual Suspects.

Palbociclib is a good candidate for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) due to its narrow therapeutic range and frequency of toxicities, particularly high-grade neutropenia. In this prospective, bicentric clinical trial, we evaluated the palbociclib exposure−toxicity relationship and determined the relevant sources of palbociclib pharmacokinetic variability, including drug−drug interactions (DDI). We followed 58 patients (mean age: 62.9 years) for 1 year. The geometric median of palbociclib plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) was 74.1 ng/mL. Neutropenia occurred in 70.7% of patients (high grade in 67.2% of patients). High-grade neutropenia occurrence during the first two palbociclib cycles was higher in patients with lower neutrophil count at initiation (p = 0.002). Palbociclib plasma Ctrough was correlated with high-grade neutropenia occurrence during the first two cycles (p = 0.024, OR 5.51). Co-treatment with agents that may interfere with palbociclib PK significantly influenced palbociclib Ctrough (p < 0.05). CYP3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors increased by 25% palbociclib Ctrough (p = 0.035), while antacids reduced it by 20% (p = 0.036). However, DDI did not have any significant effect on high-grade neutropenia occurrence (p > 0.05). This study confirms the major role of TDM to manage palbociclib safe use from the first week of treatment, particularly the significant incidence of hematological toxicity. Moreover, this first dedicated prospective study confirmed the importance of characterizing co-treatments to limit the DDI risk with oral-targeted therapies.

[Combining surgery and medical treatments for ovarian cancer: Is there an optimal strategy?] / Combinaison de la chirurgie et du traitement médical du cancer de l'ovaire : y a-t-il une stratégie optimale ?

The objective of this review is to evaluate the optimal positioning of cytoreduction surgery and perioperative medical treatments in the initial management and relapse of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma. In the initial management, primary surgery should be proposed if the absence of tumor residue is feasible with reasonable surgery (extensive surgical resections to be considered and their complications, but also the general condition of the patient). Guidelines recommend 3 to 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before interval surgery for patients not eligible for primary surgery. Late interval surgery (i.e. after≥5-6 cycles of chemotherapy) is not a standard of care and should only be proposed in case of poor tumor response after 3-4 cycles and when complete interval surgery seems feasible. At first tumor recurrence in platinum-sensitive patients, a primary cytoreduction surgery can be considered if complete surgery can be managed. Predictive scores (AGO score; i-model score) can be used to select eligible patients. Given the lack of strong evidence, performing cytoreduction surgery at first recurrence in platinum-resistant patients or in the event of subsequent recurrence cannot be recommended. Nevertheless, obtaining a complete surgery in these clinical situations seems to provide a benefit in terms of overall survival and its application should be based on the expertise of specialized teams.

Cancer-Related Alopecia: From Etiologies to Global Management.

Alopecia represents a multifaceted challenge with distinct etiologies and consequences. Transposed to the world of oncology, different types of alopecia and molecular pathways have been characterized, allowing a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. In patients with cancer, alopecia can be iatrogenic (i.e., due to conventional chemotherapies, endocrine therapies, targeted therapies, immunotherapies, radiotherapy and surgery) or a direct consequence of the disease itself (e.g., malnutrition, scalp metastases and paraneoplastic syndromes). Identification of the actual incriminated mechanism(s) is therefore essential in order to deliver appropriate supportive care, whether preventive or curative. On the preventive side, the last few years have seen the advent of the automated cooling cap, a prophylactic approach supported by several randomized clinical trials. On the curative side, although the treatments currently available are limited, several promising therapeutic approaches are under development. Appropriate alopecia management is essential, particularly regarding its psychological repercussions with significant consequences on the quality of life of patients and their family and with a potential impact on treatment compliance.

Enteral administration of alectinib for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer in an elderly patient: A case report.

RATIONALE: Alectinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for use as first-line metastatic therapy for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Certain medical conditions related to the tumor lesions may not allow oral administration of TKIs. PATIENT CONCERNS: We hereby report the case of a 90-year-old patient with anaplasic lymphoma kinase-rearranged lung cancer with severely impaired general condition and swallowing disorders. DIAGNOSIS: A thoracic computerized tomography (CT)-scan confirmed the presence of a mediastinal tumor lesion explaining the swallowing disorders secondary to recurrent paralysis. INTERVENTIONS: As no oral administration was feasible, alectinib was administered by percutaneous gastrostomy. OUTCOMES: The patient had few side-effects. He presented a major clinical and radiological response. After 2 months of treatment with alectinib, his mini-mental state examination had increased from 8/30 to 23/30. He had a 60% reduction in targeted pulmonary, bone and node lesions according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). After 6 months of treatment, the patient's performance status had evolved from 3 to 1. This improvement in general condition made it possible to remove the feeding tube. LESSONS: In cases of lung cancer with oncogenic addiction, enteral administration of TKIs should be considered for elderly patients with an impaired general condition.

[Alopecia and cancers: From basics to clinical practice]. / Alopécie et cancers : de la physiopathologie à la pratique clinique.

Alopecia, although long considered an unavoidable consequence of cancer therapy, currently presents a multifaceted challenge. The knowledge of the physiology of the hair and consequently of the pathophysiology of alopecia has led to show that there is not one but several types of alopecia. Transposed to the world of oncology, different types of alopecia and subsequently molecular pathways have been characterized, allowing a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Thus, in patients with cancer, alopecia can be iatrogenic (chemotherapies, endocrine therapies, targeted therapies, immunotherapies, radiotherapy, surgery) or directly the consequence of the disease itself (malnutrition, scalp metastases, paraneoplastic syndromes). Knowledge of the incriminated mechanism(s) could thus make it possible to deploy an appropriate care component, whether on the preventive or curative sides or in terms of supportive care. These are particularly essential regarding the psychological repercussions caused by alopecia, with significant consequences on the quality of life of patients and with a potential impact on treatment compliance. On the preventive side, the last few years have seen the advent of the automated scalp cooling therapy, supported by several randomized clinical trials. On the curative side, several therapeutic proposals are currently deployed or under development in order to provide relevant treatments.

Prospective evaluation of sexual health in breast cancer women during the first year of adjuvant hormonal treatment using a cancer patient's dedicated questionnaire: A glaring gap of communication between health professionals and patients.

PURPOSE: Sexual quality of life (QoL) is affected during and after breast cancer (BC) treatment and is not specifically evaluated with the general health-related quality-of-life questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 or QLQ-BR23. A specific questionnaire, the EORTC SHQ-C22, including physical, psychological, and social aspects of sexuality, was recently developed to address this issue in cancer patients. METHODS: A prospective bicentric study was conducted to evaluate the sexual QoL of women with BC during the first year of adjuvant hormonal treatment. RESULTS: A total of 106 women completed the 3 questionnaires at baseline and 92 of them, at 12 months. At baseline, we showed low sexual satisfaction and importance given to sexual activity and a very low communication with healthcare professionals about this issue. Twelve months later, the importance given to sexuality had increased. While the communication with professionals had improved, it remained at a very low level. We were unable to identify specific clinical factors (chemotherapy, menopausal status, type of surgery or radiotherapy) that would negatively affect the global sexual well-being in BC patients. CONCLUSION: The analysis of sexual QoL of BC patients during the first year of hormonal treatment with a recently developed, cancer-dedicated, standardized tool pointed out the need for deeper communication between professionals and patients regarding sexual issues to fill the current gap in care of cancer patients and help patients with adequate intervention and support.

Health-related quality of life as an endpoint in oncology phase I trials: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Phase I trials aim to identify the recommended dose for further development. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) could be a complement to the usual National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) scale to detect adverse events and define the doses. The objective of this study is to review the phase I in oncology which used HRQoL as endpoint. METHODS: A search in PubMed database identified phase I trials in oncology with HRQoL as endpoint, published between January 2012 to May 2016. Hematological and pediatric phase I were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 1333 phase I were identified and 15 trials were identified with HRQoL as endpoint (1.1%). The European Organisation for Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was the most frequently used instrument: 5 studies (33.3%). The targeted dimensions of HRQoL and the minimal clinically important difference were prespecified in 1 study (6.7%) and 2 studies (13.3%), respectively. Twelve studies (80%) described the statistical approach to analyze HRQoL data. Eight studies used the mean change from baseline (60%) to analyse longitudinal HRQoL data, two the mean score at certain times (13.3%), one the linear mixed model for repeated measures (6.7%), one the time to HRQoL score deterioration (6.7%), one percentage of patient-reported symptoms (6.7%). None of the studies used HRQoL to determine the recommended doses. CONCLUSION: Few phase I studies used HRQoL as endpoint and among studies with HRQoL as endpoint, the methodology of HRQoL measurement and statistical analysis was heterogeneous. HRQoL. endpoint not used for assessing the recommended phase II doses.

Minimally Important Differences for Interpreting EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to estimate the minimally important difference (MID) for interpreting group-level change over time, both within a group and between groups, for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scores in patients with advanced breast cancer. METHODS: Data were derived from two published EORTC trials. Clinical anchors (eg, performance status [PS]) were selected using correlation strength and clinical plausibility of their association with a particular QLQ-C30 scale. Three change status groups were formed: deteriorated by one anchor category, improved by one anchor category, and no change. Patients with greater anchor changes were excluded. The mean change method was used to estimate MIDs for within-group change, and linear regression was used to estimate MIDs for between-group differences in change over time. For a given QLQ-C30 scale, MID estimates from multiple anchors were triangulated to a single value via a correlation-based weighted average. RESULTS: MIDs varied by QLQ-C30 scale, direction (improvement vs deterioration), and anchor. MIDs for within-group change ranged from 5 to 14 points (improvement) and -14 to -4 points (deterioration), and MIDs for between-group change over time ranged from 4 to 11 points and from -18 to -4 points. Correlation-weighted MIDs for most QLQ-C30 scales ranged from 4 to 10 points in absolute values. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings aid interpretation of changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores over time, both within and between groups, and for performing more accurate sample size calculations for clinical trials in advanced breast cancer.

Clinical Relevance of Routine Monitoring of Patient-reported Outcomes Versus Clinician-reported Outcomes in Oncology.

The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events classification is the standard classification used by the physicians in oncology for reporting adverse events. This classification has evolved over the last years according to the emergence of new therapies. Reporting symptoms, quality of life (QoL) and toxicities via patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice is not yet a standard of care, nevertheless many studies have been conducted recently to assess feasibility and impact of routine monitoring of PROs, which should enable for better management of toxicities and earlier detection of disease progression in a more patient-centered health care delivery system. The aim of this article was to discuss the advantages and limitations of both approaches, clinicians-reported outcomes and PROs. Growing evidence supports that the routine collection of PROs leads to improvement of QoL and overall survival of cancer patients.

An international survey-based study on colorectal cancer pathology reporting-guidelines versus local practice.

Different guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) pathology reporting have been published. We aimed to identify differences between publicly available CRC reporting guidelines and to survey pathologists from different countries to establish the degree of guideline implementation in local routine practice. We compared all core and non-core items of CRC reporting guidelines to identify discrepancies. We then created a survey, which was sent out to 782 pathologists practicing in 30 different countries. It included questions on the demographics of the reporting pathologist as well as resection specimen handling and microscopic evaluation, grading, staging, and additional techniques, such as immunohistochemistry or molecular pathology. First, core and non-core items of five national CRC reporting guidelines were compared and 12 items were found to differ. Different items are considered core or non-core by different guidelines and more than one TNM staging edition was applied across guidelines. The survey was completed by 143 pathologists from 30 countries. We identified differences between local practice and guidelines with potential clinical impact, e.g., tumor budding was never reported by 28.7% of responders, although it has prognostic value for survival in stage II CRC. This is the first international study comparing CRC pathology reporting guidelines with real-world local practices. There are differences in CRC pathology reporting guidelines and in guideline implementation into local practice, both with potential impact on patient care. Harmonization of datasets, use of templates, and audits of local pathology practice are needed to ensure best possible quality of CRC pathology reporting.