Management of the post-breast-conserving therapy defect: extended follow-up and reclassification.

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal aesthetic outcomes after conservative therapy for breast cancer are not uncommon, with reported rates up to 30 percent, of which 5 percent may be considered severe. With radiotherapy being an essential component of breast-conserving therapy, surgical correction of deformities is challenging, and guidance as to reparative technique selection is currently limited. METHODS: One hundred forty-one patients have undergone surgical correction of breast-conserving therapy-induced deformity since its inception at our institution in 1991. This consecutive series has been analyzed with respect to surgical procedure, complications, revisional surgery, and aesthetic outcome (with a five-point scale) to July of 2008. RESULTS: The overall aesthetic result was considered to be at least satisfactory in 94.5 percent at 1 year and in 88.8 percent at 5 years. Secondary surgery was required in 19.1 percent and a third procedure was required in 6.4 percent. Complications were encountered in 14.2 percent. A classification into five grades of deformity was found to be practical and effective for surgical planning. CONCLUSIONS: Reparative surgery for aesthetic deformity in scarred and irradiated breasts is able to produce satisfactory aesthetic results; however, revisional surgery and complications are not inconsiderable, and the authors hope the new classification based on their long-term experience will provide practical guidance for surgical planning to other surgeons encountering such patients.

Oncoplastic breast surgery for cancer: analysis of 540 consecutive cases [outcomes article].

BACKGROUND: Synchronous plastic and oncological surgery is undertaken to improve the security of excision margins and yield high-quality aesthetic outcomes when conventional breast-conserving therapy either anticipates poor results or is not possible. METHODS: A total of 540 consecutive patients underwent primary oncoplastic breast surgery for cancer with high tumor-to-breast volume ratios and locations precluding a good aesthetic result with simple tumor excision. A variety of techniques were employed at the Institut Curie between 1986 and 2007, and aesthetic outcomes were assessed on a five-point scale from 1 (excellent) to 5 (poor). RESULTS: The median age was 52 years (range, 28 to 90 years), and median follow-up was 49 months (6 to 262 months). Median tumor size was 29.1 mm (range, 4 to 100 mm), with most patients (72.3 percent) having a brassiere cup size of B or C. Close or involved margins occurred in 18.9 percent, with mastectomy being necessary in 9.4 percent. A satisfactory aesthetic outcome (ratings of 1 to 3) at 5 years was obtained in 90.3 percent. Five-year overall and distant disease-free survival rates were 92.9 and 87.9 percent, respectively, with local recurrence in 6.8 percent. CONCLUSIONS: With local recurrence and survival rates similar to those for breast-conserving therapy, this series confirms the safety of oncoplastic breast surgery for tumors both high in volume and difficult in location. Highly satisfactory cosmetic outcomes extend the indications for conservative surgery, further reduce the mastectomy rate, and limit adverse aesthetic sequelae.

Reconstruction after conservative treatment for breast cancer: cosmetic sequelae classification revisited.

Patients with suboptimal results following breast conservative therapy are presenting more frequently to plastic surgeons as a difficult management problem. A three-type "cosmetic sequelae classification" is proposed to evaluate and manage these patients. From February of 1991 to November of 2001, 85 patients were treated for cosmetic sequelae of breast conservative therapy at the Institut Curie. The patients were followed up prospectively for 6 to 132 months (median, 33 months). They were assessed with regard to age, site and stage of tumor, type of initial breast conservative therapy undertaken, corrective operative procedures performed, complications, and cosmetic results. Forty-eight patients (56.5 percent) had type 1 cosmetic sequelae, 33 patients (38.8 percent) had type 2, and four patients (4.7 percent) had type 3. Type 1 was managed by contralateral symmetrizing procedures. Type 2 was the most difficult to manage by means of various procedures. Type 3 required mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Type 1 had 97.6 percent good results compared with 82.7 percent for type 2. Three of the four type 3 patients had good results. This article reaffirms the validity of the cosmetic sequelae classification as a simple, practical guide for breast reconstructive surgeons. It discusses the various choices of reconstructive procedures available, the importance of preventing these cosmetic sequelae, and the role of the plastic surgeon in the planning of conservative treatment of breast cancers.