Internal states as a source of subject-dependent movement variability are represented by large-scale brain networks.

Humans' ability to adapt and learn relies on reflecting on past performance. These experiences form latent representations called internal states that induce movement variability that improves how we interact with our environment. Our study uncovered temporal dynamics and neural substrates of two states from ten subjects implanted with intracranial depth electrodes while they performed a goal-directed motor task with physical perturbations. We identified two internal states using state-space models: one tracking past errors and the other past perturbations. These states influenced reaction times and speed errors, revealing how subjects strategize from trial history. Using local field potentials from over 100 brain regions, we found large-scale brain networks such as the dorsal attention and default mode network modulate visuospatial attention based on recent performance and environmental feedback. Notably, these networks were more prominent in higher-performing subjects, emphasizing their role in improving motor performance by regulating movement variability through internal states.

Non-motor Brain Regions in Non-dominant Hemisphere Are Influential in Decoding Movement Speed.

Sensorimotor control studies have predominantly focused on how motor regions of the brain relay basic movement-related information such as position and velocity. However, motor control is often complex, involving the integration of sensory information, planning, visuomotor tracking, spatial mapping, retrieval and storage of memories, and may even be emotionally driven. This suggests that many more regions in the brain are involved beyond premotor and motor cortices. In this study, we exploited an experimental setup wherein activity from over 87 non-motor structures of the brain were recorded in eight human subjects executing a center-out motor task. The subjects were implanted with depth electrodes for clinical purposes. Using training data, we constructed subject-specific models that related spectral power of neural activity in six different frequency bands as well as a combined model containing the aggregation of multiple frequency bands to movement speed. We then tested the models by evaluating their ability to decode movement speed from neural activity in the test data set. The best models achieved a correlation of 0.38 ± 0.03 (mean ± standard deviation). Further, the decoded speeds matched the categorical representation of the test trials as correct or incorrect with an accuracy of 70 ± 2.75% across subjects. These models included features from regions such as the right hippocampus, left and right middle temporal gyrus, intraparietal sulcus, and left fusiform gyrus across multiple frequency bands. Perhaps more interestingly, we observed that the non-dominant hemisphere (ipsilateral to dominant hand) was most influential in decoding movement speed.