Effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Therapy Versus Core Exercises and Manual Therapy in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain After Spinal Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate whether cognitive functional therapy (CFT) was more effective than core exercises and manual therapy (CORE-MT) in improving pain and function for patients with chronic low back pain after spinal surgery. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled superiority trial in a university hospital and a private physical therapist clinic in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Eighty participants who were 18 to 75 years old and had chronic low back pain after spinal surgery received 4 to 12 treatment sessions of CFT or CORE-MT once per week for a maximum period of 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale, scored from 0 to 10) and function (Patient-Specific Functional Scale, scored from 0 to 10) after intervention. RESULTS: We obtained primary outcome data for 75 participants (93.7%). CFT was more effective, with a large effect size, than CORE-MT in reducing pain intensity (mean difference [MD] = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.69-3.14; effect size [d] = 0.85) and improving function (MD = -2.47; 95% CI = -3.08 to -1.87; effect size = 0.95) after intervention (mean = 10.4 weeks [standard deviation = 2.17] after the beginning of treatment). The differences were maintained at 22 weeks for pain intensity (MD = 1.64; 95% CI = 0.98-2.3; effect size = 0.68) and function (MD = -2.01; 95% CI = -2.6 to -1.41; effect size = 0.81). CONCLUSION: CFT was more effective than CORE-MT, with large effect sizes, and may be an option for patients with chronic low back pain after spinal surgery. IMPACT: CFT reduces pain and improves function, with large effect sizes, compared with CORE-MT. The difference between CFT and CORE-MT was sustained at the midterm follow-up. Treatment with CFT may be an option for patients with chronic low back pain after spinal surgery.

Cognitive functional therapy (CFT) compared with core training exercise (CTE) in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS): A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the efficacy of cognitive functional therapy (CFT) compared to core training exercise (CTE) on pain and specific disability of patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). DESIGN: This will be a randomized controlled clinical trial of two groups with blinded evaluators. SETTING: The study will be conducted at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) and a private clinic in Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 80 participants, of both sexes, with FBSS. INTERVENTION: Subjects will be randomized into two groups: one group receiving CFT or CTE. Individuals will be assisted once a week, for a maximum period of 12 weeks, with four being the minimum number of visits and 12 being the maximum number of visits. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes will be pain and specific disability. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study investigating whether CFT is efficacious for patients with FBSS and chronic low back pain. The study's sample size was calculated to detect the effect of clinically relevant treatment with a low risk of bias. This clinical trial was designed to be able to reproduce an approach as a physiotherapist trained in CFT would do. That is, in a pragmatic way, increasing the significance of this study. CTE comprises a strategy widely used by physiotherapists to treat low back pain. Given that the scientific evidence of its efficacy for pain management is limited, the findings of this study will assist physiotherapists in their clinical decision-making.

Endothelins as pronociceptive mediators of the rat trigeminal system: role of ETA and ETB receptors.

The trigeminal nerve is comprised of three main divisions, ophthalmic, maxillary and mandibular, each providing somatosensory innervation to distinct regions of the head, face and oral cavity. Recently, a role for endothelins in nociceptive signaling in the trigeminal system has been proposed. The present study aimed to gain better insight into the participation of the endothelin system in trigeminal nociceptive transmission. Herein ET-1 and ET-3 mRNA was detected in the rats' trigeminal ganglion (TG). Fluorescent labeling of TG neurons revealed that ET(A) and ET(B) receptors are distributed along the entire TG, but ET(A) receptor expression slightly predominated within the three divisions. TRPV1 receptors were also detected throughout the entire TG, and a significant proportion of TRPV1-positive neurons (approximately 30%) co-expressed either ET(A) or ET(B) receptors. Our behavioral data showed that ET-1 (3 to 30 pmol/site) induced overt nociceptive responses after injection into the upper lip or temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and hyperalgesic actions when applied to the eye, while ET-3 and the selective ET(B) receptor agonist IRL-1620 (each at 3 to 30 pmol/site) showed only the first two effects. Injection of BQ-123, but not BQ-788 (ET(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonists, respectively, 10 nmol/site each, 30 min beforehand), into the ipsilateral upper lip abolished ET-1 induced facial grooming, but both antagonists markedly reduced the nociceptive responses induced by ET-1 injected into the TMJ. Taken together, these findings suggest that endothelins, acting through ET(A) and/or ET(B) receptors, may play an important role in mediating pain resulting from activation of most trigeminal nerve branches.