An experimental investigation into the physical, thermal and mechanical degradation of a polymeric bioresorbable scaffold.

This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of the mechanical, micro-mechanical and physical properties of Reva Medical Fantom Encore Bioresorbable Scaffolds (BRS) subjected to a thermally-accelerated degradation protocol. The Fantom Encore BRS were immersed in phosphate buffered saline solution at 50 °C for 112 days with radial compression testing, nanoindentation, differential scanning calorimetry, gel permeation chromatography and mass loss characterisation performed at consecutive time points. In the initial stages of degradation (Days 0-21), the Fantom Encore BRS showed increases in radial strength and stiffness, despite a substantial reduction in in molecular weight, with a slight increase in the melt temperature also observed. In the second phase (Days 35-54), the radial strength of the BRS samples were maintained despite a continued loss in molecular weight. However, during this phase, the ductility of the stent showed a reduction, with stent fracture occurring earlier in the crimp process and with lower amounts of plastic deformation evident under visual examination post-fracture. In the final phase (Days 63-112), the load-bearing capacity of the Fantom Encore BRS showed continued reduction, with decreases in radial stiffness and strength, and drastic reduction in the work-to-fracture of the devices. Throughout each phase, there was a steady increase in the relative crystallinity, with limited mass loss until day 112 and only minor changes in glass transition and melt temperatures. Limited changes were observed in nano-mechanical properties, with measured local elastic moduli and hardness values remaining largely similar throughout degradation. Given that the thermally-accelerated in vitro conditions represented a four-fold acceleration of physiological conditions, these results suggest that the BRS scaffolds could exhibit substantially brittle behaviour after âˆ¼ one year of implantation.

How to Validate in silico Deployment of Coronary Stents: Strategies and Limitations in the Choice of Comparator.

This study aims at proposing and discussing useful indications to all those who need to validate a numerical model of coronary stent deployment. The proof of the reliability of a numerical model is becoming of paramount importance in the era of in silico trials. Recently, the ASME V&V Standard Committee for medical devices prepared the V&V 40 standard document that provides a framework that guides users in establishing and assessing the relevance and adequacy of verification and validation activities performed for proving the credibility of models. To the knowledge of the authors, only a few examples of the application of the V&V 40 framework to medical devices are available in the literature, but none about stents. Specifically, in this study, the authors wish to emphasize the choice of a relevant set of experimental activities to provide data for the validation of computational models aiming to predict coronary stent deployment. Attention is focused on the use of ad hoc 3D-printed mock vessels in the validation plan, which could allow evaluating aspects of clinical relevance in a representative but controlled environment.