Emerging elevated mupirocin resistance rates among staphylococcal isolates in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2000): correlations of results from disk diffusion, Etest and reference dilution methods.

Staphylococci cause one-third of all serious invasive infections in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program including bacteremias and lower respiratory tract infections. Staphylococci are also commensals of the skin and nasal passages; therefore, topical agents active against these organisms are valuable in preventing infections or transfer of the organisms between patients and/or health care workers. Mupirocin is a potent topical anti-staphylococcal compound, but its effectiveness has been compromised by emerging resistance. In early 2000, the SENTRY Program detected 302 mupirocin-resistant isolates (131 Staphylococcus aureus, and 171 coagulase-negative staphylococci [CoNS]) from the United States (19/25 medical centers), Canada (4/5), Latin America (3/9) and Europe (7/18). One hundred sixty-eight mupirocin-resistant and 59 susceptible isolates were tested further by reference MIC, Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) and disk diffusion (5-microg) methods. Mupirocin resistance rates for blood stream infections varied by geographic area: for S. aureus from 1.9 to 5.6%, and for CoNS from 12.8 to 39.9%. Using elevated mupirocin MIC results, two resistant populations were noted: low-level resistance at 8-128 microg/mL and high-level resistance at > or = 1024 microg/mL. Acceptable correlation was observed between Etest and disk diffusion results (r = 0.84) without serious intermethod interpretive errors. High-level resistant isolates had heavy growth with no visible zone around the disk; low-level resistant isolates produced hazy zones of inhibition, and susceptible strains had clear zones of inhibition at > or = 17 mm. As mupirocin resistance can be plasmid-mediated, the prudent and appropriate use of this topical agent is important to minimize the ongoing development of resistance. Local surveillance for emerging mupirocin resistance appears warranted particularly in the United States and Canada, pragmatically using a disk diffusion test screening. Where more precise data are needed, the Etest is a very accurate method for distinguishing mupirocin low-level from high-level resistance patterns.

Comparative antimicrobial spectrum and activity of BMS284756 (T-3811, a desfluoroquinolone) tested against 656 Enterobacteriaceae, including preliminary in vitro susceptibility test comparisons and development.

BMS284756 (T-3811), a novel des-F(6)-quinolone, was evaluated using isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program tested by Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden), reference broth microdilution and disk diffusion (5-microg) methods. Ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gemifloxacin and gatifloxacin were also tested by broth microdilution as comparator antimicrobial agents within the same drug class. The 656 isolate collection included species from the genera Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Hafnia, Klebsiella, Morganella, Pantoea, Proteus, Providencia, Salmonella, and Serratia. BMS284756 was slightly less active than comparison fluoroquinolones against these isolates (MIC(90), 4 mg/l versus 0.06-2 mg/l). However, at a proposed susceptible breakpoint of < or =4 mg/l, 90.7% of the isolates processed were susceptible to BMS284756, demonstrating an equivalent spectrum of activity to all other agents except gemifloxacin (86.6%). In general, isolates requiring >4 mg/l of BMS284756 for inhibition of growth were also less susceptible to the comparators suggesting cross-resistance is common between des-F(6)- and fluoro-quinolones. Excellent correlation was observed between broth microdilution MIC results and 5-microg disk zone diameters (r=0.94), and between broth microdilution dilution and Etest MIC values (r=0.96). In conclusion, BMS284756 has an activity and spectrum similar to contemporary fluoroquinolones and in vitro test methods (NCCLS, Etest) appear accurate and reproducible

Three independent yearly analyses of the spectrum and potency of metronidazole: a multicenter study of 1,108 contemporary anaerobic clinical isolates.

To comply with ongoing United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations about the validation of prescribing information, in each of three years (1994, 1996, 1997) at six medical centers, metronidazole was tested against > or = 50 strains of a range of contemporary anaerobic clinical bacteria. Species having > or = 90% susceptibility (MIC, < or = 8 microg/ml) to metronidazole (fulfilling FDA requirements) included Bacteroides fragilis, B. distasonis, B. ovatus, B. thetaiotaomicron, B. vulgatus, Fusobacterium spp. and Clostridium spp. Only Eubacterium spp. and anaerobic Gram-negative cocci failed to achieve the required proportion of susceptibility throughout the 3 year period. Metronidazole appears to remain highly active versus anaerobic species associated with strict anaerobic organisms.