Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Oncol ; 27(1): 36-43, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29549902

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to refine the optimal lymph node dissection in Western patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). BACKGROUND: Lymphadenectomy is essential in addition to surgery for AEG. Asian studies continually present superior survival rates using a more extended lymphadenectomy compared with results reproduced in the West. Thus, the optimal extend of the lymphadenectomy remains unclear in Western patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort was conducted of patients with AEG from January 1st, 2003 to December 31st, 2011. All patients undergoing curatively intended surgery was included. Two types of resections were constructed; Res1 included patients where only the loco regional lymph nodes were removed (station 1-4, 7 and 9) and Res2 included the additional removal of the more distant stations 8 and/or 11. RESULTS: We identified 510 patients with AEG. The highest frequency of lymph node metastases was seen in the loco regional stations 1-3, 7 and 9, ranging from 34% to 41.4%. There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups; the median survival rate for Res1 was 30.4 months compared to 24.1 months for Res2 (p = 0.157). Furthermore, the extend of lymph node dissection seemed to have no effect on survival (HR = 1.061, 95%CI 0.84-1.33). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in survival between the extended and the less extended lymphadenectomy was found. The presence of metastases in distant lymph nodes indicates poor survival and may represent disseminated disease. We do not find evidence that supports an extended lymph node dissection in Western patients.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/mortalidade , Junção Esofagogástrica/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo/mortalidade , Excisão de Linfonodo/normas , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Junção Esofagogástrica/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 22(4): 587-594, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29134504

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of ketorolac and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on anastomotic leakage after surgery for gastro-esophageal-junction cancer. Within the last two decades, the incidence of gastro-esophageal-junction cancer has increased in the western world and surgery is the curative treatment modality of choice. Anastomotic leakage is a feared complication of gastro-esophageal surgery, as it increases recurrence, morbidity, and mortality. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used for postoperative pain relief. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have, however, in colorectal surgery, been shown to increase the risk of anastomotic leakage. METHOD: In a historical cohort study, we investigated the impact of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on anastomotic leakage in 557 patients undergoing surgery for gastro-esophageal-junction cancer. Data were collected from a prospective maintained database, the Danish National Patient Registry, and patient medical records. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistical models and were stratified for theoretical confounders. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, we did not observe any difference in age, gender, tobacco exposure, or comorbidity status between patients experiencing anastomotic leakage and those without. In multivariate analysis, gender, histology, and type of anastomosis proved to affect odds ratios for anastomotic leakage. After adjustment for possible confounders, we found an odds ratio of 6.05 (95% confidence interval 2.71; 13.5) for ketorolac use and of 5.24 (95% confidence interval 1.85; 14.8) for use of other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for anastomotic leakage during the first seven postoperative days. CONCLUSION: In the present study, we found a strong association between the postoperative use of ketorolac and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk for anastomotic leakage after surgery for gastro-esophageal-junction cancers.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/induzido quimicamente , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Junção Esofagogástrica/cirurgia , Cetorolaco/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Esofagectomia/métodos , Esofagectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Cetorolaco/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...