Experiments on in vivo biofilm formation and in vitro adhesion of Candida species on polysiloxane liners.

OBJECTIVES: Microorganisms may colonise polysiloxane soft liners leading to bio-deterioration. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro adhesion and in vivo biofilm formation of Candida species on polysiloxane surfaces. METHODS: The materials used in this study were Molloplast B, GC Reline soft, Mollosil Plus, Silagum Comfort and Palapress Vario. The in vitro retention of clinical isolates of Candida albicans to the relining and denture-base materials by microscopic (scanning electron microscopy, SEM), conventional culturing methods and antimicrobial properties of these materials were studied. Candida found on materials and mucosa following long-term use were identified and quantified, and biofilms covering the surfaces were investigated by SEM. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the number of cells attached in vitro to saliva-coated surfaces compared with non-treated surfaces. An oral Candida carriage of 78% was found. Candida albicans, C. glabrata, C. intermedia and C. tropicalis were identified. In vivo biofilm formation on the liners appeared as massive colonisation by microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the in vitro experiments suggest that salivary film influences early colonisation of different C. albicans strains. The film layer also minimises the differences among different strains. The Candida carriage of these patients was similar to denture-wearing patients without soft liners.

A prospective study on the clinical performance of polysiloxane soft liners: one-year results.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical performance of four denture soft liners up to 12 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three edentulous patients who experienced difficulties when using hard denture bases because of changes in denture-supporting tissues were accepted for the study and randomly received Molloplast B, GC Reline Soft, Silagum Comfort, or Mollosil Plus relines. Performance of the materials was evaluated using nine criteria at 3, 6, and 12 months: physical integrity, surface detail, adhesion, color, odor, plaque accumulation, resilience, hygiene, and mucosal condition. A four-point categorized scale (1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=excellent) was used. Unscheduled maintenance events and the presence of fungal colonization were also recorded. RESULTS: The percentage of patients available at 3, 6, and 12 months were 91%, 91%, and 66%. Main reasons for dropouts and discontinuation were fractured dentures and patient dissatisfaction. At 6 months, 96% of the performance scores were good or excellent and the largest changes were observed for physical integrity, surface detail, color, and fungal colonization. Fungal colonization was the most commonly observed problem and was the only reason of failure at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical performance of all soft liners was slightly impaired over the 12-month observation. Except for cases showing extensive fungal colonization, the observed changes in clinical performance did not necessitate remaking of the dentures. Mollosil Plus showed a performance comparable to that of Molloplast B, and the other materials had slightly lower performance especially in terms of fungal colonization.