Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Dent Res ; 83(11): 854-8, 2004 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15505235

RESUMO

Crowns and large amalgams protect structurally compromised teeth to various degrees in different situations. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the survival of teeth with these two types of restorations and the factors associated with better outcomes. Retrospective administrative and chart data were used. Survival was defined and modeled as: (1) receipt of no treatment and (2) receipt of no catastrophic treatment over five- and 10-year periods. Analyses included: Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Log-Rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. Crowns survived longer with no treatment and with no catastrophic treatment; however, mandibular large amalgams were least likely to have survived with no treatment, and maxillary large amalgams were least likely to have survived with no catastrophic treatment. Having no adjacent teeth also decreased survival. Crowns survived longer than large amalgams, but factors such as arch type and the presence of adjacent teeth contributed to the survival of large amalgams.


Assuntos
Coroas , Amálgama Dentário , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Restauração Dentária Permanente/métodos , Dente Pré-Molar , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Dente Molar , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Retratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo
2.
J Fam Pract ; 50(7): 613, 2001 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11485711

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Physician office laboratory regulations may decrease test availability. We examined the potential effects of regulations on test availability and whether the use of tests in diagnosing uncomplicated urinary tract infections is related to availability. STUDY DESIGN: We performed an analysis of a cross-sectional survey conducted in 1994 and 1995. Test availability and use were determined by physicians' reports. POPULATION: The survey respondents included practicing physicians in 3 specialties (family medicine, general internal medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology) from 4 states: Pennsylvania (which had longstanding office laboratory regulations), and Alabama, Minnesota, and Nebraska (states that were not regulated until the implementation of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment of 1988). OUTCOMES MEASURED: We determined whether 4 specific tests were available in the office and how the tests were used to diagnose uncomplicated urinary tract infections. RESULTS: Our analysis was based on the responses from the 1898 respondents to the survey. All tests were less commonly available in Pennsylvania; this included the dipstick, microscopic urinalysis, wet prep, and urine culture (odds ratio [OR]=0.20-0.34; all P values < .05). The availability of the microscopic urinalysis and culture increased their use (OR = 4.37 and 2.03, respectively; P=.001). The availability of microscopic urinalysis was associated with a decrease in ordering urine cultures (OR=0.42; P=.001), and the availability of the dipstick was associated with a decrease in the use of both the microscopic urinalysis (OR=0.36; P=.02) and the culture (OR=0.48; P=.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found lower test availability in the state with office laboratory regulations and a decrease in testing when availability is reduced, suggesting that laboratory regulations may influence physicians&rsquo diagnostic approach to urinary tract infections. Further study will be required to determine the level of testing that maximizes patient welfare.


Assuntos
Laboratórios/legislação & jurisprudência , Urinálise/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Adulto , Alabama , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Minnesota , Nebraska , Pennsylvania
3.
J Gen Intern Med ; 14(8): 491-4, 1999 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10491234

RESUMO

To determine practicing physicians' strategies for diagnosing and managing uncomplicated urinary tract infection, we surveyed physicians in general internal medicine, family practice, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergency medicine in four states. Responses differed significantly by respondents' specialty. For example, nitrofurantoin was the antibiotic of first choice for 46% of obstetricians, while over 80% in the other specialties chose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Most surveyed said they do not usually order urine culture, but the percentage who do varied by specialty. Most use a colony count of 10(5) colony-forming units or more for diagnosis although evidence favors a lower threshold, and 70% continue antibiotic therapy even if the culture result is negative. This survey found considerable variation by specialty and also among individual physicians regarding diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infection and also suggests that some of the new information from the literature has not been translated to clinical practice.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Urinários/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Medicina , Nitrofurantoína/uso terapêutico , Especialização , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...