Indications and Outcomes for Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation at a Military Referral Facility.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal life support, including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), is a potentially life-saving adjunct to therapy in patients experiencing pulmonary and/or cardiac failure. The U.S. DoD has only one ECMO center, in San Antonio, Texas. In this study, we aimed to analyze outcomes at this center in order to determine whether they are on par with those reported elsewhere in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational study, we analyzed data from patients treated with ECMO at the only DoD ECMO center between September 2012 and April 2020. The primary outcome was survival to discharge, and secondary outcomes were discharge disposition and incidence of complications. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three patients were studied, with a 70.6% rate of survival to discharge. Of the patients who survived, 32.7% were discharged home; 32.7% were discharged to a rehabilitation facility; and 33.7% were transferred to another hospital, 29.4% of whom were transferred to lung transplant centers. One patient left against medical advice. Incidence of ECMO-related complications were as follows: 64 patients (44.7%) experienced hemorrhagic complications, 80 (55.9%) had renal complications, 61 (42.6%) experienced cardiac complications, 39 (27.3%) had pulmonary complications, and 5 patients (3.5%) experienced limb ischemia. We found that these outcomes were comparable to those reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be an efficacious adjunct in management of critically ill patients who require pulmonary and/or cardiac support. This single-center observational study demonstrated that the DoD's only ECMO center has outcomes comparable with the reported data in Extracorporeal Life Support Organization's registry.

ECMO in trauma care: What you need to know.

ABSTRACT: Over the past 10 years, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use in trauma patients has increased significantly. This includes adult and pediatric trauma patients and even combat casualties. Most ECMO applications are in a venovenous (VV ECMO) configuration for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or anatomic injuries that require pneumonectomy or extreme lung rest in a patient with insufficient respiratory reserve. In this narrative review, we summarize the most common indications for VV ECMO and other forms of ECMO support used in critically injured patients, underscore the importance of early ECMO consultation or regional referral, review the technical aspects of ECMO cannulation and management, and examine the expected outcomes for these patients. In addition, we evaluate the data where it exists to try to debunk some common myths surrounding ECMO management.

Tube Thoracostomy Complications in Patients With ARDS Requiring ECMO: Worse in COVID-19 Patients?

INTRODUCTION: The incidence and management outcomes of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) requiring chest tubes are not well-described. This study sought to explore differences in tube thoracostomy rates and subsequent complications between patients with and without COVID-19 ARDS on V-V ECMO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a single institution, retrospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 ARDS requiring V-V ECMO. The control cohort consisted of patients who required V-V ECMO for ARDS-related diagnoses from January 2018 to January 2021. The primary outcome was any complication following initial tube thoracostomy placement. Study approval was obtained from the Brooke Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board (C.2017.152d). RESULTS: Twenty-five COVID-19 patients and 38 controls were included. Demographic parameters did not differ between the groups. The incidence of pneumothorax was not significantly different between the two groups (44% COVID-19 vs. 22% control, OR 2.8, 95% CI 0.95-7.9, P = 0.09). Patients with COVID-19 were as likely to receive tube thoracostomy as controls (36% vs. 24%, OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.55-5.7). Complications, however, were more likely to occur in the COVID-19 group (89% vs. 33%, OR 16, 95% CI, 1.6-201, P = 0.0498). CONCLUSIONS: Tube thoracostomy placement in COVID-19 patients with ARDS requiring V-V ECMO is common, as are complications following initial placement. Clinicians should anticipate the need for re-intervention in this patient population. Small-bore (14Fr and smaller) pigtail catheters appeared to be safe and efficacious in this setting, but further study on tube thoracostomy management in ECMO patients is needed.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in COVID-19 Patients: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Revised guidelines clarify indications for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Limited data exist to compare clinical outcomes of COVID-19 ARDS patients to non-COVID-19-related ARDS patients when supported with ECMO. An observational propensity-matched study was performed to compare clinical and ECMO-related complications between COVID-19-related ARDS patients (COVID) and non-COVID-19-related ARDS (Control). COVID- patients cannulated from March 1st, 2020, through June 1st, 2021, were included and matched to patients from the historical cohort at our center from 2012 to 2020 based on age, body mass index (BMI), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, and duration ECMO run. The primary outcome was complications during ECMO therapy. A total of 56 patients were propensity matched 1:1 with a mean age of 40.9 years, BMI 32.1 kg/m2, APACHE II score of 26.6, and duration of ECMO support of 22.6 days. In total 18 COVID-19 patients were observed to have more major bleeding complications (18 vs. 9, p = 0.03). Although not statistically significant, they also had more strokes (6 vs. 3) and required more chest tubes (13 vs. 8). Inpatient mortality was not different. ECMO support in COVID-19 patients is associated with more major bleeding complications, strokes, and chest tube placements. The use of ECMO in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS appears to be associated with an increased risk of complications.

Appendectomy for Vague Symptoms and Equivocal Physical Findings on Physical Exam and Computed Tomography.

Background: Appendicitis is a common condition affecting 7-8% of the general population. With the improvement of noninvasive imaging, the diagnostic approach and treatment algorithm for patients with clear signs and symptoms suggestive of acute appendicitis are well agreed-upon. However, patients without pathognomonic signs and symptoms, but with equivocal imaging pose a diagnostic dilemma. These patients may still have acute appendicitis and could potentially benefit from laparoscopic appendectomy. This may be especially true in the subset of patients with appendicoliths.Methods: Our case series exams a group of patients with atypical symptoms who eventually underwent appendectomy and were followed after surgery for at least a month. This case series consists of eight patients with abdominal pain accompanied by a variety of other signs and symptoms in addition to laboratory results and imagining characteristics which were nondiagnostic. These patients had initial Alvarado scores ranging from 0-6.Results: All of these patients were subsequently taken to the operating room for diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic appendectomy. Of these patients, six were known to have appendicoliths based on computed tomography obtained during initial diagnostic workup.Conclusions: All patients underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy and appendectomy. Four had appendicitis and four also had resolution of their symptoms. There exist atypical presentations of appendiceal disease. Patients with abdominal pain/tenderness, even without diagnostic laboratory results or imaging characteristics, may benefit from laparoscopic appendectomy.