Methotrexate and gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate transport in CEM and CEM/MTX human leukemic lymphoblasts.

In a continuing investigation of determinants of their 200-fold methotrexate resistance and their collateral sensitivity to gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate, the ability of CEM/MTX cells to transport the two drugs was analyzed and compared with that of CEM cells. The Km and Vmax values for the influx of methotrexate into CEM cells did not differ significantly from those of CEM/MTX cells, and this was the case for gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate as well. Surface binding and influx rates were proportional to cell surface area, but differences in efflux rates and methotrexate uptake were too large to be explained on this basis. Neither methotrexate nor trimetrexate competed with gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate influx in CEM cells. However, both drugs perturbed the gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate steady state in CEM cells, resulting in slightly less uptake than with gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate alone. However, the major difference between the two cell types was in the methotrexate uptake plateau, which was much greater in the case of the parental cell line. A related observation was the more rapid efflux of methotrexate from CEM/MTX cells than from CEM cells. The poor uptake, the associated meager capacity to polyglutamylate methotrexate and the enhanced methotrexate efflux appear to be responsible for its decreased activity against CEM/MTX cells. Half-lives for gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate efflux were the same in both cell lines, allowing the drug to accumulate to cytotoxic levels despite its inability to form polyglutamates.

Elevation of a gamma delta T cell subset in peripheral blood and synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

We examined the levels of TcR delta 1+ T cells (total gamma delta T cell) and delta TCS1+ (gamma delta T cell subset) T cells in the peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid (SF) of 16 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and compared them to the levels in PB of patients with Felty's syndrome (FS) and 21 healthy control subjects (NML). Synovial fluid from eight patients with seronegative spondyloarthropathies (SSA) was also examined. The results demonstrated elevated levels of the delta TCS1+ subset in the PB of RA and FS patients relative to NML (P less than 0.05). No such differences were observed in the levels of PB TcR delta 1+ T cells. The results did not appear to reflect a non-specific inflammatory response since delta TCS1 T cells were elevated in the SF of RA patients relative to SSA SF and NML PB. delta TCS1 T cells in SSA PB and SSA SF were comparable to NML PB. TcR delta 1+ T cells levels in RA SF were higher than SSA SF levels but were comparable to those of NML PB. Taken together, the results support a pathogenic role for delta TCS1+ T cells in RA.

Glutathione monoethyl ester can selectively protect liver from high dose BCNU or cyclophosphamide.

Normal Swiss Webster mice were treated with monocrotaline or high doses of three antitumor alkylating agents (BCNU, cyclophosphamide, or mitomycin C), all of which have been connected with hepatic veno-occlusive disease at our clinic. Prior administration of WR-2721 did not improve the survival of monocrotaline-treated animals. Glutathione (GSH) improved the survival of these animals to a small degree. Glutathione monoethyl ester (GSHet) almost completely protected animals from the toxicity of monocrotaline. Pretreatment with WR-2721 produced moderate increases in survival at the highest doses of BCNU, and at the lower BCNU doses none of the animals pretreated with WR-2721 died before they were killed on day 150. Pretreatment with GSHet gave good protection from BCNU toxicity at the highest dose of the drug, and there were no deaths in the groups of animals treated with GSHet 1 hour before BCNU. On a multiple dose schedule, GSH provided some protection from cyclophosphamide toxicity; GSHet gave a very good level of protection from cyclophosphamide. In none of these treatment groups were lesions suggestive of hepatic or pulmonary venoocclusive disease identified. In all three experimental protocols (monocrotaline, BCNU, and cyclophosphamide), there was a consistent decrease in hepatic toxicity after GSHet pretreatment; this was not observed in GSH- or WR-2721-pretreated animals. There was no evidence of protection of the FSaIIC fibrosarcoma growing in C3H mice as assayed by tumor growth delay or tumor cell survival in groups treated with two different doses of GSHet 1 hour before each drug injection compared to those treated with the BCNU or cyclophosphamide alone, or BCNU with cyclophosphamide. Pretreatment with GSHet did not alter the toxicity of these drugs to bone marrow. GSHet appears to be an effective protector of critical normal tissue and does not appear to protect tumor.

Combination of N,N',N"-triethylenethiophosphoramide and cyclophosphamide in vitro and in vivo.

In vitro and in vivo studies with the drug combination thioTEPA and cyclophosphamide (CPA) were carried out using the MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cell line and the EMT6 mouse mammary carcinoma cell line. In vitro, survival curves were essentially linear. The EMT6 cell line was less sensitive to thioTEPA than the MCF-7 cell line, with concentrations which reduce cell survival to 10% of 440 and 140 microM, respectively. The response of both cell lines to 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide was similar. Simultaneous and immediate sequential treatments with these drugs produced supraadditive cell killing of both cell lines, although the magnitude of the supraadditivity was greater in the MCF-7 cell line than in the EMT6 cell line. Both of these drugs appeared to be as effective as thiol-depleting agents as is diethyl maleate. By DNA alkaline elution, there was a pattern of increasing DNA cross-linking similar to the increasing levels of cytotoxicity of this drug combination with increasing thioTEPA concentrations. In the EMT6 tumor in vivo, the maximally tolerated combination therapy (5 mg/kg x 6 thioTEPA and 100 mg/kg x 3 CPA) produced about 25 days of tumor growth delay which was not significantly different than expected for additivity of the individual drugs. The survival of EMT6 tumor cells after treatment of the animals with various single doses of thioTEPA and CPA was assayed. Tumor cell killing by thioTEPA produced a very steep, linear survival curve through 5 logs. The tumor cell survival curve for CPA out to 500 mg/kg gave linear tumor cell kill through almost 4 logs. In all cases, the combination treatment tumor cell survivals fell well within the envelope of additivity. Both of these drugs are somewhat less toxic toward bone marrow cells by the granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit in vitro assay method than to tumor cells. The combination treatments were subadditive or additive in bone marrow granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit killing. When bone marrow is the dose-limiting tissue, there is a therapeutic advantage to the use of this drug combination.

Collateral methotrexate resistance in cultured human head and neck carcinoma cells selected for resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II).

A human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma line (SCC25) derived from a patient with no prior history of radiotherapy or chemotherapy was made resistant to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP) by continuous escalation of weekly 30-min pulses of the CDDP from 0 to 0.2 mM over 20 months and then cloned and pulsed weekly with 0.2 mM CDDP for another 20 months. This afforded a resistant subline, SCC25/CP[1], with an IC50 for CDDP 12-fold higher than that of the parental cells. The SCC25/CP[1] cells unexpectedly proved to be cross-resistant to methotrexate (MTX) (24-fold for 30-min treatment and 8-fold for continuous treatment). Resistance was associated with a modest (about 2-fold) increase in the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) content according to radioligand-binding assay, and in the rate of cell division. In addition there was a 4-fold decrease in the fraction of long-chain MTX polyglutamates MTX(G4-6) in the cell after 24 h exposure to either 0.2 or 2.0 microM MTX. When the SCC25/CP[1] cells were kept out of CDDP for 8-9 months and 12 months to give the sublines SCC25/CP[2] and SCC25/CP[3], respectively, MTX sensitivity to continuous exposure returned to normal. The SCC25/CP[3] cells still exhibited a slightly elevated DHFR level, but their generation time became shorter than that of the parental SCC25 line. In addition the SCC25/CP[3] cells had an initial uptake velocity (V0) for MTX that was 9-fold greater than the V0 of the SCC25 or SCC25/CP[1] cells, while its ability to form MTX(G4-6) was comparable to that of the SCC25 cells. When SCC25/CP[2] cells were rechallenged with weekly 0.2 mM CDDP pulses for 4-6 months, a MTX-resistant line, SCC25/CP[4], was produced. The SCC25/CP[4] cells retained a slightly elevated DHFR content and a high proliferation rate, but the V0 for MTX influx was intermediate between SCC25 and SCC25/CP[3] cells. The ability to form the longer-chain polyglutamates MTX(G4-6) was again impaired. Thus, MTX cross-resistance can develop in cultured head and neck carcinoma cells when CDDP is used as the selecting agent for primary resistance. MTX resistance is multifactorial, as it is when MTX itself is used as the selecting agent, and appears to involve various combinations of altered growth rate, DHFR content, MTX uptake, and ability to form noneffluxing long-chain MTX polyglutamate species. These results are potentially of clinical relevance, since CDDP and MTX are often used in combination with other drugs or with radiation to treat patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Metabolism of methotrexate and gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate by human leukemic cells in culture and by hepatic aldehyde oxidase in vitro.

The cellular uptake and metabolism of methotrexate (MTX) and gamma-tert-butyl methotrexate (TBM) were compared in CEM human leukemic lymphoblasts and a highly MTX-resistant subline (CEM/MTX) in which MTX uptake is defective. The CEM/MTX cells were found previously to be as sensitive as the parent line to TBM. While MTX was polyglutamylated extensively in the CEM cells, giving abundant levels of non-effluxing conjugates, polyglutamylation in CEM/MTX cells was reduced severely, even after exposure to a high MTX concentration (100 microM) in the medium. This treatment provided free intracellular MTX in greater than 100-fold excess over the dihydrofolate reductase level. In contrast to MTX, the ester TBM was unmetabolized in either cell line. Uptake levels after incubation of CEM and CEM/MTX cells with 2 microM TBM for 24 hr were 17 and 15 pmol/mg protein respectively. Thus, TBM accumulated equally in both cells and was well retained despite the lack of polyglutamylation. These results, together with the previously observed affinity of the drug for dihydrofolate reductase, provide a plausible rationale for the comparable sensitivity of CEM and CEM/MTX cells to TBM. Experiments were also performed to determine the susceptibility of TBM to metabolic detoxification by hepatic aldehyde oxidase. Km values were 8-fold lower for TBM than for MTX in assays using an enzyme preparation from rabbit liver, and Vmax values were 8-fold higher. Neither MTX nor TBM was oxidized to its 7-hydroxy derivative in intact CEM or CEM/MTX cells. Because TBM is capable of overcoming at least one of the modalities of MTX resistance, defective polyglutamylation, and may be more efficiently detoxified than MTX by the action of hepatic aldehyde oxidase, it has the potential to be a useful agent for the treatment of MTX-resistant tumors.

Alkylating agents: in vitro studies of cross-resistance patterns in human cell lines.

The alkylating agents represent one of the most important classes of antitumor agents and play a major role in combination with other agents in the curative chemotherapy of selected human cancers. By repeatedly exposing cells to escalating doses of an alkylating agent, we have developed four human tumor cell lines which are relatively stably resistant to the drug with which the culture was treated. The response of these cell lines to a variety of alkylating agents was compared to the response of the parent cell lines to the same drug. The Raji/HN2 line was 7-fold resistant to nitrogen mustard and about 3-fold resistant to 4-hydroxyperoxycyclophosphamide, but it was not resistant to N,N'-bis(2-chloroethyl)-N-nitrosourea (BCNU), melphalan (MEL), busulfan, trimethyleneiminethiophosphoramide, 4-hydroperoxyifosfamide, or cisplatin [cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)] (CDDP). The Raji/BCNU line was 5.3-fold resistant to BCNU and 4-fold resistant to both MEL and CDDP. The Raji/CP line was 7-fold resistant to CDDP and 3-fold resistant to both nitrogen mustard and BCNU, but it was not resistant to busulfan, trimethyleneiminethiophosphoramide, or 4-hydroperoxyifosfamide. The SCC-25/CP line, which was 12-fold resistant to CDDP, was 5-fold resistant to MEL and 3-fold resistant to 4-hydroxyperoxycyclophosphamide. The SCC-25/CP line was almost 24-fold resistant to methotrexate after 30-min treatment and about 7-fold resistant to methotrexate after continuous treatment. None of the other cell lines was resistant to methotrexate. The survival of SCC-25 and SCC-25/CP cells exposed to several antineoplastic agents was examined over several logs of survival. The SCC-25/CP cells are highly resistant to CDDP; the ratio of the slopes of the survival curves (SCC-25/CP to SCC-25) of the two lines was 43. At survivals of 1%, resistance to MEL and BCNU became evident in the SCC-25/CP line. At survivals of 0.1%, resistance to mitomycin C and, to a lesser degree, to Adriamycin and vincristine was evident. It is more difficult to produce resistance to alkylating agents, even with extended selection pressure, than to other antineoplastic drugs such as antimetabolites and natural products. We found no evidence of pleiotropic resistance in any alkylating agent-resistant cell line. Our results suggest that a judicious choice of alkylating agents given in sequential or concurrent combination may be a rational treatment strategy with potential applications in the clinic.