End-of-Life Care: A Multimodal and Comprehensive Curriculum for Graduating Medical Students Utilizing Experiential Learning Opportunities.

Introduction: End-of-life (EOL) care is an essential skill for most physicians and health care providers, yet there continues to be an educational gap in medical education literature for these skills. The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine developed the Transition to Residency, Internship, and Preparation for Life Events (TRIPLE) curriculum with the primary goal of preparing graduating medical students for life after medical school. Methods: The EOL module was one of many within the TRIPLE curriculum and consisted of two half-day sessions that targeted EOL care, death, dying, and communication skills. The first half-day session focused on a standardized patient encounter where learners initiated and completed an EOL care goals conversation around a living will. The second half-day session focused on death and dying. It included didactic sessions on organ donation, autopsy/death certificates, a simulation-based learning session on ending a resuscitation, and a standardized patient encounter where learners disclosed the death of a loved one. End-of-day and end-of-course evaluations were collected via anonymous online surveys. Results: In 2019, 120 students and 26 instructors participated in TRIPLE. Students rated the EOL module overall as 4.6 of 5 (SD = 0.6) and rated instructors overall as 4.6 of 5 (SD = 0.6). Discussion: By implementing a thorough and diverse curriculum with a variety of modalities and targeted skills, learners may be better prepared to care for patients dealing with EOL care issues. Further, the generalization of these skills may assist learners in a variety of other aspects of patient and family care.

Development and Pilot Testing of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Objective Our aim was (1) to develop an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and (2) to test the reliability and evaluate the feasibility of this OSCE while assessing residents' clinical skills in multiple core competencies via the standardized patient methodology. Study Design Development of assessment tool. Setting Johns Hopkins Medicine Simulation Center. Subjects and Methods Residents of the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine were invited to participate. A 2-station OSCE was developed. The first station used a standardized patient, and the encounter was videotaped for later evaluation by medical faculty not familiar with the participants being tested. The second was a computer-based station developed per a modified Delphi technique, based on feedback from otolaryngology and sleep medicine faculty involved in the care of patients with OSA. Checklists were developed for each station to standardize the evaluation of each trainee's performance. Results The OSCE that we developed is a feasible tool for assessing residents' performance and skills to diagnose and manage a patient with OSA. Internal consistency, as assessed by Krippendorff's alpha, was 0.699 for station 1 and 0.95 for station 2. Conclusion This OSCE was found to be feasible for assessment of clinical competency in OSA. Our model provides targeted assessment of multiple competencies and opportunity to improve clinical knowledge and skills.

How do gender and anxiety affect students' self-assessment and actual performance on a high-stakes clinical skills examination?

PURPOSE: Research suggests that medical students are not accurate in self-assessment, but it is not clear whether students over- or underestimate their skills or how certain characteristics correlate with accuracy in self-assessment. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of gender and anxiety on accuracy of students' self-assessment and on actual performance in the context of a high-stakes assessment. METHOD: Prior to their fourth year of medical school, two classes of medical students at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine completed a required clinical skills exam in fall 2010 and 2011, respectively. Two hundred two students rated their anxiety in anticipation of the exam and predicted their overall scores in the history taking and physical examination performance domains. A self-assessment deviation score was calculated by subtracting each student's predicted score from his or her score as rated by standardized patients. RESULTS: When students self-assessed their data gathering performance, there was a weak negative correlation between their predicted scores and their actual scores on the examination. Additionally, there was an interaction effect of anxiety and gender on both self-assessment deviation scores and actual performance. Specifically, females with high anxiety were more accurate in self-assessment and achieved higher actual scores compared with males with high anxiety. No differences by gender emerged for students with moderate or low anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Educators should take into account not only gender but also the role of emotion, in this case anxiety, when planning interventions to help improve accuracy of students' self-assessment.