PeriOperative Quality Initiative (POQI) international consensus statement on perioperative arterial pressure management.

Arterial pressure monitoring and management are mainstays of haemodynamic therapy in patients having surgery. This article presents updated consensus statements and recommendations on perioperative arterial pressure management developed during the 11th POQI PeriOperative Quality Initiative (POQI) consensus conference held in London, UK, on June 4-6, 2023, which included a diverse group of international experts. Based on a modified Delphi approach, we recommend keeping intraoperative mean arterial pressure ≥60 mm Hg in at-risk patients. We further recommend increasing mean arterial pressure targets when venous or compartment pressures are elevated and treating hypotension based on presumed underlying causes. When intraoperative hypertension is treated, we recommend doing so carefully to avoid hypotension. Clinicians should consider continuous intraoperative arterial pressure monitoring as it can help reduce the severity and duration of hypotension compared to intermittent arterial pressure monitoring. Postoperative hypotension is often unrecognised and might be more important than intraoperative hypotension because it is often prolonged and untreated. Future research should focus on identifying patient-specific and organ-specific hypotension harm thresholds and optimal treatment strategies for intraoperative hypotension including choice of vasopressors. Research is also needed to guide monitoring and management strategies for recognising, preventing, and treating postoperative hypotension.

Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: A Joint Consensus Statement by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Cardiac Society, ERAS International Society, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS).

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to lessen surgical insult, promote recovery, and improve postoperative clinical outcomes across a number of specialty operations. A core tenet of ERAS involves the provision of protocolized evidence-based perioperative interventions. Given both the growing enthusiasm for applying ERAS principles to cardiac surgery and the broad scope of relevant interventions, an international, multidisciplinary expert panel was assembled to derive a list of potential program elements, review the literature, and provide a statement regarding clinical practice for each topic area. This article summarizes those consensus statements and their accompanying evidence. These results provide the foundation for best practice for the management of the adult patient undergoing cardiac surgery.

Focused transoesophageal TOE (fTOE): A new accreditation pathway.

The concept of a focused ultrasound study to identify sources of haemodynamic instability has revolutionized patient care. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) using transthoracic scanning protocols, such as FUSIC Heart, has empowered non-cardiologists to rapidly identify and treat the major causes of haemodynamic instability. There are, however, circumstances when a transoesphageal, rather than transthoracic approach, may be preferrable. Due to the close anatomical proximity between the oesophagus, stomach and heart, a transoesphageal echocardiogram (TOE) can potentially overcome many of the limitations encountered in patients with poor transthoracic ultrasound windows. These are typically patients with severe obesity, chest wall injuries, inability to lie in the left lateral decubitus position and those receiving high levels of positive airway pressure. In 2022, to provide all acute care practitioners with the opportunity to acquire competency in focused TOE, the Intensive Care Society (ICS) and Association of Anaesthetists (AA) launched a new accreditation pathway, known as Focused Transoesophageal Echo (fTOE). The aim of fTOE is to provide the practitioner with the necessary information to identify the aetiology of haemodynamic instability. Focused TOE can be taught in a shorter period of time than comprehensive and teaching programmes are achievable with support from cardiothoracic anaesthetists, intensivists and cardiologists. Registration for fTOE accreditation requires registration via the ICS website. Learning material include theoretical modules, clinical cases and multiple-choice questions. Fifty fTOE examinations are required for the logbook, and these must cover a range of pathology, including ventricular dysfunction, pericardial effusion, tamponade, pleural effusion and low preload. The final practical assessment may be undertaken when the supervisors deem the candidate's knowledge and skills consistent with that required for independent practice. After the practitioner has been accredited in fTOE, they must maintain knowledge and competence through relevant continuing medical education. Accreditation in fTOE represents a joint venture between the ICS and AA and is endorsed by Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical care (ACTACC). The process is led by TOE experts, and represents a valuable expansion in the armamentarium of acute care practitioners to assess haemodynamically unstable patients.

FUSIC HD. Comprehensive haemodynamic assessment with ultrasound.

FUSIC haemodynamics (HD) - the latest Focused Ultrasound in Intensive Care (FUSIC) module created by the Intensive Care Society (ICS) - describes a complete haemodynamic assessment with ultrasound based on ten key clinical questions: 1. Is stroke volume abnormal? 2. Is stroke volume responsive to fluid, vasopressors or inotropes? 3. Is the aorta abnormal? 4. Is the aortic valve, mitral valve or tricuspid valve severely abnormal? 5. Is there systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve? 6. Is there a regional wall motion abnormality? 7. Are there features of raised left atrial pressure? 8. Are there features of right ventricular impairment or raised pulmonary artery pressure? 9. Are there features of tamponade? 10. Is there venous congestion? FUSIC HD is the first system of its kind to interrogate major cardiac, arterial and venous structures to direct time-critical interventions in acutely unwell patients. This article explains the rationale for this accreditation, outlines the training pathway and summarises the ten clinical questions. Further details are included in an online supplementary appendix.

The PRICES statement: an ESICM expert consensus on methodology for conducting and reporting critical care echocardiography research studies.

PURPOSE: Echocardiography is a common tool for cardiac and hemodynamic assessments in critical care research. However, interpretation (and applications) of results and between-study comparisons are often difficult due to the lack of certain important details in the studies. PRICES (Preferred Reporting Items for Critical care Echocardiography Studies) is a project endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and conducted by the Echocardiography Working Group, aiming at producing recommendations for standardized reporting of critical care echocardiography (CCE) research studies. METHODS: The PRICE panel identified lists of clinical and echocardiographic parameters (the "items") deemed important in four main areas of CCE research: left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions, right ventricular function and fluid management. Each item was graded using a critical index (CI) that combined the relative importance of each item and the fraction of studies that did not report it, also taking experts' opinion into account. RESULTS: A list of items in each area that deemed essential for the proper interpretation and application of research results is recommended. Additional items which aid interpretation were also proposed. CONCLUSION: The PRICES recommendations reported in this document, as a checklist, represent an international consensus of experts as to which parameters and information should be included in the design of echocardiography research studies. PRICES recommendations provide guidance to scientists in the field of CCE with the objective of providing a recommended framework for reporting of CCE methodology and results.

Current Anesthetic Care of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Europe: Results of an Online Survey.

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an alternative treatment for patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis not eligible for surgical valve replacement due to a high periprocedural risk or comorbidities. However, there are several areas of debate concerning the pre-, intra- and post-procedural management. The standards and management for these topics may vary widely among different institutions and countries in Europe. DESIGN: Structured web-based, anonymized, voluntary survey. SETTING: Distribution of the survey via email among members of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology working in European centers performing TAVR between September and December 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The survey consisted of 25 questions, including inquiries regarding number of TAVR procedures, technical aspects of TAVR, medical specialities present, preoperative evaluation of TAVR candidates, anesthesia regimen, as well as postoperative management. Seventy members participated in the survey. Reporting members mostly performed 151-to-300 TAVR procedures per year. In 90% of the responses, a cardiologist, cardiac surgeon, cardiothoracic anesthesiologist, and perfusionist always were available. Sixty-six percent of the members had a national curriculum for cardiothoracic anesthesia. Among 60% of responders, the decision for TAVR was made preoperatively by an interdisciplinary heart team with a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist, yet in 5 countries an anesthesiologist was not part of the decision-making. General anesthesia was employed in 40% of the responses, monitored anesthesia care in 44%, local anesthesia in 23%, and in 49% all techniques were offered to the patients. In cases of general anesthesia, endotracheal intubation almost always was performed (91%). It was stated that norepinephrine was the vasopressor of choice (63% of centers). Transesophageal echocardiography guiding, whether performed by an anesthesiologist or cardiologist, was used only ≤30%. Postprocedurally, patients were transferred to an intensive care unit by 51.43% of the respondents with a reported nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:2 or 1:3, to a post-anesthesia care unit by 27.14%, to a postoperative recovery room by 11.43%, and to a peripheral ward by 10%. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that requirements and quality indicators (eg, periprocedural anesthetic management, involvement of the anesthesiologist in the heart team, etc) for TAVR procedures as published within the European guideline are largely, yet still not fully implemented in daily routine. In addition, anesthetic TAVR management also is performed heterogeneously throughout Europe.

Perioperative care in cardiac surgery.

As mortality is now low for many cardiac surgical procedures, there has been an increasing focus on patient centered outcomes such as recovery and quality of life. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) cardiac society recently published the first set of guidelines for cardiac surgery which will be useful as a starting point to help translate this philosophy for the benefit of those undergoing cardiac surgery. At the same time there are many advances in other areas such as mechanical circulation, diagnostics and quality metrics. We intend here to present a balanced and evidenced based review of selected aspects of current practice, encompassing both UK and international perioperative care with a focus on recent advances. For the convenience of the reader we will adopt the conventional perioperative preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative phases of care. The focus of cardiac surgical practice needs to evolve from mortality to recovery. Those specialists who work in cardiac anaesthesia and critical care are well placed to contribute to these changes. Accompanying this work is the development of technologies to improve recognition of and intervention to prevent early organ dysfunction. Measuring, benchmarking and publishing quality outcomes from cardiac surgical centres is likely to improve services and benefit our patients.

Early Extubation in Enhanced Recovery from Cardiac Surgery.

Prolonged intubation and mechanical ventilation following cardiac surgery have been associated with increased hospital and intensive care unit length of stays; higher health care costs; and morbidity resulting from atelectasis, intrapulmonary shunting, and pneumonia. Early extubation was developed as a strategy in the 1990s to reduce the high-dose opiate regimes and long ventilator times. Early extubation is a key component of the enhanced recovery pathway following cardiac surgery and enables early mobilization and early return to a normal diet. The plan to extubate should start as soon as the patient is scheduled for cardiac surgery and continue throughout the perioperative period.

Increased atrial contraction contribution to left ventricular filling during early septic shock.

PURPOSE: To assess the atrial systolic function and the contribution of atrial contraction to left ventricular (LV) filling in septic shock patients as compared with healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-seven septic patients evaluated during first 48 h of ICU admission and compared with 27 healthy volunteers. Left atrial (LA) contraction contribution to LV filling was calculated as the active emptying atrial volume/LV end-diastolic volume. Atrial systolic function was evaluated with the atrial kinetic force [LAKE = 0.5 × blood density × LVVactive × (peak A velocity)2] and atrial ejection force [LASF = 0.5 × blood density × mitral annulus area × (peak A velocity)2]. RESULTS: LV ejection fraction was lower in septic patients than in control group: 51 ±â€¯14%vs 60 ±â€¯6% (p < 0.01). Contribution of LA contraction to LV preload was greater in septic patients than in normal subjects (26.7 ±â€¯11.3% vs 15.9 ±â€¯5.9%, p < 0.001), even if adjusted for age (0.49 ±â€¯0.19 vs 0.35 ±â€¯0.13, p = 0.004). LAKE and LASF were also significantly larger in septic patients than in normal subjects (21.8 ±â€¯9.1 vs 7.3 ±â€¯3 kdynes·cm, p < 0.001; 16.1 ±â€¯11.7 vs 9.8 ±â€¯4.3 kdynes, p = 0.048, respectively), and remained unchanged during the next 48 h. CONCLUSION: In septic shock patients, LA systolic function increased and greatly contributed to support LV filling. These results highlight the role of preserving atrial contraction on the hemodynamic resuscitation in early septic shock.

Implementation of a nurse-led protocol for early extubation after cardiac surgery: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Protocols for nurse-led extubation are as safe as a physician-guided weaning in general intensive care unit (ICU). Early extubation is a cornerstone of fast-track cardiac surgery, and it has been mainly implemented in post-anaesthesia care units. Introducing a nurse-led extubation protocol may lead to reduced extubation time. AIM: To investigate results of the implementation of a nurse-led protocol for early extubation after elective cardiac surgery, aiming at higher extubation rates by the third postoperative hour. METHODS: A single centre prospective study in an 18-bed, consultant-led Cardiothoracic ICU, with a 1:1 nurse-to-patient ratio. During a 3-wk period, the protocol was implemented with: (1) Structured teaching sessions at nurse handover and at bed-space (all staff received teaching, over 90% were exposed at least twice; (2) Email; and (3) Laminated sheets at bed-space. We compared "standard practice" and "intervention" periods before and after the protocol implementation, measuring extubation rates at several time-points from the third until the 24th postoperative hour. RESULTS: Of 122 cardiac surgery patients admitted to ICU, 13 were excluded as early weaning was considered unsafe. Therefore, 109 patients were included, 54 in the standard and 55 in the intervention period. Types of surgical interventions and baseline left ventricular function were similar between groups. From the third to the 12th post-operative hour, the intervention group displayed a higher proportion of patients extubated compared to the standard group. However, results were significant only at the sixth hour (58% vs 37%, P = 0.04), and not different at the third hour (13% vs 6%, P = 0.33). From the 12th post-operative hour time-point onward, extubation rates became almost identical between groups (83% in standard vs 83% in intervention period). CONCLUSION: The implementation of a nurse-led protocol for early extubation after cardiac surgery in ICU may gradually lead to higher rates of early extubation.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) evidence-based protocols for perioperative care can lead to improvements in clinical outcomes and cost savings. This article aims to present consensus recommendations for the optimal perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A review of meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, large nonrandomized studies, and reviews was conducted for each protocol element. The quality of the evidence was graded and used to form consensus recommendations for each topic. Development of these recommendations was endorsed by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society.

The influence of prolonged intensive care stay on quality of life, recovery, and clinical outcomes following cardiac surgery: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay on quality of life and recovery following cardiac surgery. METHODS: Quality of life was assessed using the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF36). The Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale was used to assess quality of recovery, disability, and cognition after ICU discharge over 12 months' follow-up. Prolonged ICU stay was defined as ≥3 postoperative days. Mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were recorded up to 12 months. RESULTS: For quality of life, the physical component improved over time in both groups (P < .01 for both groups), as did the mental component (P < .01 for both groups). The long ICU group had lower physical and mental components over time (both P values < .01), but by 12 months the values were similar. The overall quality of recovery was lower for the long ICU group (P < .01). Likewise, we found higher rates of recovery in the normal ICU group than in the long ICU group in terms of emotive recovery (P < .01), activities of daily living (P < .01), and cognitive recovery (P = .03) but no differences in terms of physiologic (P = .91), nociceptive (P = .89), and satisfaction with anesthetic care (P = .91). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (P < .01), 30-day mortality (P < .01), and length of ward stay (P < .01) were all higher with prolonged ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prolonged ICU stay have lower quality of life scores; however, they achieve similar midterm quality of recovery, but with reduced survival, increased major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and longer hospital length of stay.

Readmission to the Intensive Care Unit Following Cardiac Surgery: A Derived and Validated Risk Prediction Model in 4,869 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a clinical risk index that can predict readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective nonrandomized study to determine the perioperative variables associated with risk of readmission to the ICU after cardiac surgery. SETTING: The study was carried out in a single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: This was an analysis of 4,869 consecutive adult patients. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent cardiac surgery at a single center and were discharged to the ward from the ICU during the index surgical admission. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 156 patients (3.2%) were readmitted to the ICU during their index surgical admission. Risk factors associated with readmission were identified by performing univariate analysis followed by multivariate logistic regression. The final multivariable regression model was validated internally by bootstrap replications. Nine independent variables were associated with readmission: urgency of surgery, diabetes, chronic kidney disease stage 3 to 5, aortic valve surgery, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, postoperative anemia, hypertension, preoperative neurological disease, and the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre score. Our data also showed mortality (18% v 3.2%, p < 0.0001) was significantly higher in readmitted patients. The median duration of ICU stay (7 [4-17] v 1 [1-2] days, p < 0.0001) and hospital stay (20 [12-33] v 7 [5-10] days, p < 0.0001) were significantly longer in patients who were readmitted to ICU compared to those who were not. CONCLUSION: From a comprehensive perioperative dataset, the authors have derived and internally validated a risk index incorporating 9 easily identifiable and routinely collected variables to predict readmission following cardiac surgery.

Does the "Weekend Effect" for Postoperative Mortality Stand Up to Scrutiny? Association for Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Critical Care Cohort Study of 110,728 Cardiac Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Ongoing debate focuses on whether patients admitted to the hospital on weekends have higher mortality than those admitted on weekdays. Whether this apparent "weekend effect" reflects differing patient risk, care quality differences, or inadequate adjustment for risk during analysis remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the existence of a "weekend effect" for risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected cardiac registry data. SETTING: Ten UK specialist cardiac centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 110,728 cases, undertaken by 127 consultant surgeons and 190 consultant anesthetists between April 2002 and March 2012. INTERVENTIONS: Major risk-stratified cardiac surgical operations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Crude in-hospital mortality rate was 3.1%. Multilevel multivariable models were employed to estimate the effect of operative day on in-hospital mortality, adjusting for center, surgeon, anesthetist, patient risk, and procedure priority. Weekend elective cases had significantly lower mortality risk compared to Monday elective cases (odds ratio [OR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42, 0.96) following risk adjustment by the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) and procedure priority; differences between weekend and Monday for urgent and emergency/salvage cases were not significant (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.73, 1.72, and 1.07, 95% CI 0.79, 1.45 respectively). Considering only the logistic EuroSCORE but not procedure priority yielded 29% higher odds of death for weekend cases compared to Monday operations (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08, 1.54). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that undergoing cardiac surgery during the weekend does not affect negatively patient survival, and highlights the importance of comprehensive risk adjustment to avoid detecting spurious "weekend effects."

Effect of individual patient risk, centre, surgeon and anaesthetist on length of stay in hospital after cardiac surgery: Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care (ACTACC) consecutive cases series study of 10 UK specialist centres.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative contributions of patient risk profile, local and individual clinical practice on length of hospital stay after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Ten-year audit of prospectively collected consecutive cardiac surgical cases. Case-mix adjusted outcomes were analysed in models that included random effects for centre, surgeon and anaesthetist. SETTING: UK centres providing adult cardiac surgery. PARTICIPANTS: 10 of 36 UK specialist centres agreed to provide outcomes for all major cardiac operations over 10 years. After exclusions (duplicates, cases operated by more than one consultant, deaths and procedures for which the EuroSCORE risk score for cardiac surgery is not appropriate), there were 107 038 cardiac surgical procedures between April 2002 and March 2012, conducted by 127 consultant surgeons and 190 consultant anaesthetists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Length of stay (LOS) up to 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The principal component of variation in outcomes was patient risk (represented by the EuroSCORE and remaining patient heterogeneity), accounting for 95.43% of the variation for postoperative LOS. The impact of the surgeon and centre was moderate (intra-class correlation coefficients ICC=2.79% and 1.59%, respectively), whereas the impact of the anaesthetist was negligible (ICC=0.19%). Similarly, 96.05% of the variation for prolonged LOS (>11 days) was attributable to the patient, with surgeon and centre less but still influential components (ICC=2.12% and 1.66%, respectively, 0.17% only for anaesthetists). Adjustment for year of operation resulted in minor reductions in variation attributable to surgeons (ICC=2.52% for LOS and 2.23% for prolonged LOS). CONCLUSIONS: Patient risk profile is the primary determinant of variation in LOS, and as a result, current initiatives to reduce hospital stay by modifying consultant performance are unlikely to have a substantial impact. Therefore, substantially reducing hospital stay requires shifting away from a one-size-fits-all approach to cardiac surgery, and seeking alternative treatment options personalised to high-risk patients.

Hemodynamic Effect of Different Doses of Fluids for a Fluid Challenge: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are to determine what is the minimal volume required to perform an effective fluid challenge and to investigate how different doses of IV fluids in an fluid challenge affect the changes in cardiac output and the proportion of responders and nonresponders. DESIGN: Quasi-randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Cardiothoracic ICU, tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: Eighty postcardiac surgery patients. INTERVENTION: IV infusion of 1, 2, 3, or 4 mL/Kg (body weight) of crystalloid over 5 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean systemic filling pressure measured using the transient stop-flow arm arterial-venous equilibrium pressure, arterial and central venous pressure, cardiac output (LiDCOplus; LiDCO, Cambridge, United Kingdom), and heart rate. The groups were well matched with respect to demographic and baseline physiologic variables. The proportion of responders increased from 20% in the group of 1 mL/kg to 65% in the group of 4 mL/kg (p = 0.04). The predicted minimal volume required for an fluid challenge was between 321 and 509 mL. Only 4 mL/Kg increases transient stop-flow arm arterial-venous equilibrium pressure beyond the limits of precision and was significantly associated with a positive response (odds ratio, 7.73; 95% CI, 1.78-31.04). CONCLUSION: The doses of fluids used for an fluid challenge modify the proportions of responders in postoperative patients. A dose of 4 mL/Kg increases transient stop-flow arm arterial-venous equilibrium pressure and reliably detects responders and nonresponders.

Cardiac sarcoma presenting with abdominal pain and mimicking myxoma on echocardiogram.

Cardiac sarcoma's are highly aggressive tumours. Clear resection margins ± autotransplant, followed by chemotherapy, offers the best survival chance. Therefore, frozen section should be preformed when there is ambiguity in diagnosis.