Robot-assisted support combined with electrical stimulation for the lower extremity in stroke patients: a systematic review.

Objective. The incidence of stroke rising, leading to an increased demand for rehabilitation services. Literature has consistently shown that early and intensive rehabilitation is beneficial for stroke patients. Robot-assisted devices have been extensively studied in this context, as they have the potential to increase the frequency of therapy sessions and thereby the intensity. Robot-assisted systems can be combined with electrical stimulation (ES) to further enhance muscle activation and patient compliance. The objective of this study was to review the effectiveness of ES combined with all types of robot-assisted technology for lower extremity rehabilitation in stroke patients.Approach. A thorough search of peer-reviewed articles was conducted. The quality of the included studies was assessed using a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist. Relevant information regarding the interventions, devices, study populations, and more was extracted from the selected articles.Main results. A total of 26 articles were included in the review, with 23 of them scoring at least fair on the methodological quality. The analyzed devices could be categorized into two main groups: cycling combined with ES and robots combined with ES. Overall, all the studies demonstrated improvements in body function and structure, as well as activity level, as per the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health model. Half of the studies in this review showed superiority of training with the combination of robot and ES over robot training alone or over conventional treatment.Significance. The combination of robot-assisted technology with ES is gaining increasing interest in stroke rehabilitation. However, the studies identified in this review present challenges in terms of comparability due to variations in outcome measures and intervention protocols. Future research should focus on actively involving and engaging patients in executing movements and strive for standardization in outcome values and intervention protocols.

Stop using the Ashworth Scale for the assessment of spasticity.

AIM: Many studies have been performed on the methodological qualities of the (modified) Ashworth Scale but overall these studies seem inconclusive. The aim of this study was to investigate the construct validity and inter-rater reliability of the Ashworth Scale (AS) for the assessment of spasticity in the upper and lower extremities. METHOD: A cross-sectional study on spasticity in the elbow flexors (part 1) and knee extensors (part 2) was carried out. In both parts AS was assessed while muscle activity and resistance were recorded simultaneously in patients with upper motor neuron syndrome. Each patient was measured by three raters. RESULTS: 30 patients participated, 19 in each part of the study. For elbow flexor muscles, AS was not significantly associated with electromyographic parameters, except for rater 2 (rho = 0.66, p<0.01). A significant moderate association was found with resistance (0.54< or = rho < or =0.61, p<0.05). For knee extensors, AS scores were moderately associated with muscle activity (0.56< or = rho < or =0.66, p<0.05) and also with resistance (0.55< or = rho < or =0.87, p<0.05). The intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute agreement was 0.58 for elbow flexors and 0.63 for knee extensors. In linear mixed model analysis, the factor rater appeared to be highly associated with AS. CONCLUSION: The validity and reliability of the AS is insufficient to be used as a measure of spasticity.

Patient ratings of spasticity during daily activities are only marginally associated with long-term surface electromyography.

AIM: To investigate the association between subjective spasticity ratings and objective spasticity measurement using a new tool for spasticity assessment, that is long-term surface electromyography (sEMG) recordings during daily activities. For monitoring, processing and analysis of this long-term sEMG data, a muscle activity detection algorithm was developed. METHOD: sEMG of the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, adductor group and semitendinosus of 14 complete spinal-cord-injured patients, in whom voluntary muscle contraction was absent, was recorded continuously during daily activities. Synchronously, subjects stored their activities in a diary and scored their experienced level of spasticity on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for that particular activity. sEMG data were analysed using a high-quality burst-detection algorithm that was developed and validated within this study. Derived sEMG parameters were clustered using principal-component analysis (PCA) and used in a linear mixed model analysis to study their association with VAS. RESULTS: VAS scores appeared significantly associated with the PCA components representing the number and the duration of bursts, but not burst amplitude. Furthermore, VAS scores were associated with the activity performed. The percentage explained variance was, however, low, that is 27-35%. CONCLUSIONS: Patient ratings of the level of spasticity appear poorly associated with spasticity in terms of involuntary muscle activity assessed with long-term sEMG recordings. It is likely that other factors such as pain and cognitions are also incorporated in these patient ratings. Clinicians are therefore strongly advised to perform complementary objective assessments using long-term sEMG recordings.

Muscle activation patterns of knee flexors and extensors during passive and active movement of the spastic lower limb in chronic stroke patients.

The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of spasticity, quantified as muscle activity during stretch, during passive and active movement. For this cross sectional study 19 stroke patients with spasticity in the lower limb were recruited. Reflex activity was studied with surface electromyography of knee flexor and extensor muscles during passive and active movement of the lower leg. On both the affected and unaffected side, root mean square values of the knee extensor muscles, while stretched, were higher during active than during passive movement (p<0.05). For the vastus lateralis (VL) the correlation was moderate (rho=0.54, p=0.022), for the rectus femoris (RF) high (rho=0.83, p<0.001). For the semitendinosus (ST) the correlation was low (rho=0.27) and not significant. During active movement the correlation between VL activity and activity of the antagonist ST, as an indicator for co-contraction of the affected muscles, was marked (rho=0.73, p=0.001). A moderate negative correlation was found between reflex activity of RF during passive stretch and the active range of motion (rho=-0.51, p=0.027). The results show that a passive stretch test alone is insufficient either as assessment method for spasticity during active motor tasks or as a measure for motor control.