[Effects of a return-to -home assistance programm (PRADO-IC) on the patient journey in a cohort of cardiac heart failure patients]. / Effets du programme d'aide au retour à domicile (PRADO-IC) sur le parcours de soins à un an d'une population de patients insuffisants cardiaques.

INTRODUCTION: Congestive heart failure (HF) is associated with prolonged and recurrent hospitalizations; the prognosis remains poor a better follow up might be beneficial. PRADO-IC program is provided in order to improve the transition of care. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate PRADO-IC program in term of healthcare consumption and prognosis in a cohort of patients hospitalized for decompensated HF, using the insight of the national data base SNDS (Système National de Données de Santé). METHODS: From September 2016 to September 2018, all patients hospitalized for heart failure at Saint-Joseph Hospital were included in an observational study. The inclusion in the PRADO-IC program was at physician's discretion. Two groups were compared according to the inclusion in PRADO-IC (P group) or not (control group (C)). The primary endpoints were the comparison of one-year mortality and heart failure readmission rate between the two groups. The secondary end points were time to the first contact with a general practitioner (GP), a cardiologist, CHF drugs prescription, and others follow up data. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifteen patients were included, 254 in the P group and 361 in the C group. Patients in the P cohort presented more frequently severity criteria (age, weight, BNP level, arrhythmia, anemia, renal failure). Mortality at one year (n = 47; 18.5% P group vs. n = 65; 16.2% C group, p = 0.87) did not differ in both groups. There was no significant difference in one-year re-hospitalization rate for HF (n = 93, 36.6% in P group vs. n = 133, 26.8% in C group, p = 0.95). Time to the first contact with the GP was shorter in P group (8.00 vs. 18.50 days, p < 0.0001). Time to first hospitalization (69.0 vs. 37.0 days, p = 0.028) and the length of hospitalization (6.0 vs. 4.0 days, p = 0.045) were longer in P group. There was no difference for HF drugs prescription rate between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the PRADO-IC program concerned more severe patients. Despite this, the one-year mortality and the HF readmission rates are similar between the two groups. The follow up is improved in P group.

[Impact of Home Return Assistance Service in Heart Failure (PRADO-IC) on the one year re-hospitalisation and mortality in a heart failure hospitalized population of patients]. / Impact du programme d'aide au retour à domicile-insuffisance cardiaque (PRADO-IC) sur la mortalité et la réhospitalisation à un an dans une population de patients insuffisants cardiaques.

INTRODUCTION: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is associated with prolonged and recurrent hospitalizations; the prognosis remains poor. Since 2013, the Caisse Primaire d'Assurance Maladie (CPAM) has set up a support program PRADO-IC (support program for returning home after hospitalisation for heart failure). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PRADO-IC on the heart failure readmission rate and death rate at one year. METHODS: From September 2016 to September 2018, all patients hospitalized for heart failure at Saint-Joseph Hospital were included in an observational study. The inclusion in PRADO-IC program was at physician's discretion. Two groups were compared according to the inclusion in PRADO-IC or not (T). The primary endpoints were the comparison of one-year mortality and heart failure readmission rate between the two groups. RESULTS: Six hundred and thirty-three patients were included, 262 in the PRADO-IC group and 371 in the non-PRADO group. Patients in the PRADO-IC cohort more frequently present severity criteria (age, weight, BNP level, arrhythmia, anemia, renal failure). Mortality at one year (19.5% vs 16.2%, p = 0.28) are equivalent in both groups. There were no significant differences in one-year rehospitalization rate for heart failure (HF) (35.1% in PRADO cohort vs 28% in T group, p = 0.06), the time to first hospitalization (74.5 days in PRADO vs 54.5 days in T, p = 0.55) and the length of hospitalization (6.0 days in PRADO vs 7.0 days in T, p = 0.29) between the two groups. Age, hyponatremia, anemia, cancer, HF re-hospitalization were variables linked to a risk of mortality, in a multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the PRADO-IC program concerned to the most severe patients. Despite this, the one-year mortality and the HF readmission rate are similar between the two groups.

Données épidémiologiques d'une cohorte de patients hospitalisés pour insuffisance cardiaque. Étude mono-centrique sur 3 ans. Comparaison avec les données régionales.

INTRODUCTION: Congestiveheart failure (CHF) is associated with prolonged and recurrent hospitalizations, the prognosis remains poor. The aim of this study was to collect epidemiologic data at admission and at six month follow-up in a cohort of patients with CHF admitted to a single center between 2017 and 2019 (Saint Joseph Hospital, HSJ) and to compare these data with regional data (Ile-de-France, IdF). METHODS: Local and regional data were provided by National Health Service, Regional Department of Ile de France(DRSM) using national data base. CHF in-hospital stay was defined by appropriate CIM 10 code reported on the final medical form. RESULTS: From 2017 to 2019, 1967 CHF in-hospital stays were collected, mean age of the population was 81.4 (=mean) ± 11.7 yearsIC95% [80.8; 81.9], mean length of stay was 8.6 ± 6.8 days IC95% [8.3; 8.9], in-hospital mortality was 5.3 %, 9.6% at 2nd month and 15.9% at 6th month. Readmission rate was 23.7%, time to readmission was 59.5 ± 47.5 days IC95% [57.4; 61.6]. IdF data collected 60973 CHF in-hospital stays at the same period. Compared to the IdF population, our population was older (81.4 ± 11.6 versus 80.4 ± 12.6 years, p = 0.001). Length of stay was shorter (8.6 ± 6.8 versus 11.3 ± 10.1 days p<0.001), in-hospital mortality was lower (5.3% versus 7.8% p < 0.001), 2nd month and 6th month mortality was lower (respectively 9.6% versus 14.2% and 15.9% versus 21.3%, p <0.001), home discharge rate was higher (66.9% versus 60.8%, p < 0.001) in the HSJ population. The proportion of patients included in PRADO-IC program (Programme d'aide au retour à domicile-Insuffisance Cardiaque, Returning home support program) was higher in SJ population (22.6% versus 8.8% p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CHF admission involved elderly patients, the in-hospital and 6th month mortality is high, with early and frequent readmissions. Differences between HSJ and IdF populations may be explained by the heterogeneity of health care facilities, management facilities and organization of transition of care.

Real-world costs and outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with targeted therapies: a cohort study from the French health insurance database.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe treatment patterns, survival, healthcare use and costs in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in a real-world setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used the National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database for the Ile-de-France region to perform a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with mRCC treated by a first-line targeted therapy. Treatment naïve patients were identified combining the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes (C64 & C77-C79) and a first prescription of targeted therapies. Descriptive analyses were performed on treatment patterns and patients' characteristics. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival analysis. All healthcare resource use and costs were estimated on a per patient per month (PPPM) basis (€2016). RESULTS: A total of 327 treatment naïve patients with mRCC were included. Median follow-up was 13.4 months. Sunitinib accounted for 73% of first-line treatments. The most frequently observed treatment sequence for the first two lines was sunitinib-everolimus (16%; n = 137) and for the first three lines sunitinib-everolimus-axitinib (20%; n = 49). First-line PFS for sunitinib, everolimus, pazopanib, sorafenib and other was 8.7, 6.2, 10.7, 5.7 and 11.2 months, respectively. Median OS for patients treated by first-line sunitinib, everolimus, pazopanib, sorafenib and other was respectively 14.7, 8.1, 21.1, 8.9 and 14.0 months. From the NHI's perspective, the mean PPPM was €5546. The average PPPM in pre-progression was €5597 compared to €5541 beyond progression of the disease. Oral targeted therapies accounted for 53% of the total PPPM. CONCLUSION: This descriptive study showed that the economic burden of mRCC is substantial with oral targeted therapies accounting for 53% of the PPPM. OS and PFS in real life are poorer than observed in clinical trials.