The COVID-19 infection control response at a large stand-alone comprehensive cancer center in Los Angeles County.

BACKGROUND: The City of Hope National Medical Center (COH) is the only stand-alone comprehensive cancer center in Los Angeles, a county that was deemed a COVID-19 pandemic epicenter at the height of the 2020 winter surge. The immunocompromised patient population frequently experienced delays in infection control guidelines from local and government bodies due to minimal data available in comparison to the general population. This required COH to make swift, informed decisions for the best interest of the patient population. AIM: Here, we review the comprehensive COVID-19 infection control response conducted at COH within the context of a high-risk patient population, predominately comprised of patients with hematologic malignancies. METHODS AND RESULTS: This infection control response focused on prevention of COVID-19 transmission on campus, COVID-19 testing, and isolation management. These efforts consisted of COVID-19 screening, limitation of personnel on campus, source control, contact tracing, COVID-19 vaccination, establishment of in-house testing and implementation and management of COVID-19 testing. Between January 2020 and September 2021, COH implemented a robust in-house testing program, completed well over 1000 contact traces, ensured COVID-19 vaccinations were distributed to all eligible staff and patients, and established an algorithm for COVID-19 infection resolution, all without compromising the number of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HCTs) performed, surgical volume, or healthcare-associated standardized infection ratios (SIR). CONCLUSION: Institutional collaboration and attention to infection control was pivotal to minimizing the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pandemic Operating Room Supply Shortage and Surgical Site Infection: Considerations as We Emerge from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created shortages of operating room (OR) supplies, forcing healthcare systems to make concessions regarding "standard" OR attire. At our institution, we were required to reduce shoe covers, reuse face masks, and allow washable head coverings. We determined if these changes affected surgical site infection (SSI) rates. STUDY DESIGN: A single institutional study was performed to compare the SSI rates reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network in the 2 years preceding COVID-19 (PRE, January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020) with the first 12 months after the pandemic (POST, April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021). We confirmed our findings using propensity score matching and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Elimination of traditional shoe covers, disposable head covers, and single-use face masks was associated with a decreased SSI rate from 5.1% PRE to 2.6% POST (p < 0.001). Furthermore, this was despite a 14% increase in surgical volume and an increase in the number of contaminated/dirty cases (2.2% PRE vs 7.4% POST, p < 0.001). Use of disposable face masks decreased by 4.3-fold during this period from 3.5 million/y PRE to 0.8 million/y POST. Of note, inpatient hand hygiene throughout the hospital increased from 71% PRE to 85% POST (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis has practical applications as we emerge from the pandemic and make decisions regarding OR attire. These data suggest that disposable head covers and shoe covers and frequent changes of face masks are unnecessary, and discontinuation of these practices will have significant cost and environmental implications. These data also reinforce the importance of good hand hygiene for infection prevention.

Preventing Central Line Blood Stream Infections in Critical Care Patients.

Currently, the Centers for Disease Control reports close to 40,000 central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) occur in acute care facilities in the United States each year. Most are considered preventable. Evidence-based practices such as the CLABSI bundle and central line maintenance bundles have demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing CLABSI. This article reviews these best practices and provides a framework for consistent implementation.

Artificial Differences in Clostridium difficile Infection Rates Associated with Disparity in Testing.

In 2015, Clostridium difficile testing rates among 30 US community, multispecialty, and cancer hospitals were 14.0, 16.3, and 33.9/1,000 patient-days, respectively. Pooled hospital onset rates were 0.56, 0.84, and 1.57/1,000 patient-days, respectively. Higher testing rates may artificially inflate reported rates of C. difficile infection. C. difficile surveillance should consider testing frequency.

Reduction of surgical site infections in low transverse cesarean section at a university hospital.

BACKGROUND: We implemented evidence-based interventions to reduce risk of surgical site infection (SSI) following low transverse cesarean section (LTCS). METHODS: An observational study was conducted to determine LTCS SSI rates and the impact of infection control interventions at an academic teaching hospital during the period October 2005 to December 2008, including the use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) for surgical skin preparation before LTCS and no-rinse CHG cloths for preoperative skin cleansing. We compared overall and risk strata specific SSI rates and standardized incidence ratios during 4 study periods and estimated cost savings. RESULTS: Of 1,844 LTCSs performed, 99 patients were identified with SSI. SSI rates per 100 LTCS declined from 6.27 at baseline and 10.84 during the outbreak period to 5.92 in intervention 1 period and 2.29 in intervention 2 period. Overall, a 63.5% reduction in SSI rate from baseline was achieved by ensuring compliance with SSI prevention guidelines and improving skin antisepsis (P = .003). In intervention 2 period, the standardized incidence ratio was 0.99 compared with 2.64 at baseline and 4.50 during the outbreak period. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary approach including evidence-based SSI prevention practices, effective infection prevention products, and staff and patient engagement substantially reduced infection risk and improved patient safety following LTCS.