Reestenosis binaria post-ACTP con balón de corte previo a la colocación de stent / Binary restenosis post-cutting balloon ptca before stenting

The goal of the study is to describe our experience in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with cutting balloon, evaluating the immediate and mid-term outcomes. The cutting balloon is a device used as a strategy to promote plaque rupture and to allow for its distribution. METHODS: This is a descriptive study to evaluate the clinical and angiographic restenosis rate (Binary restenosis). Patients with incomplete clinical data were excluded. From January 2003 to June 2004, 1,300 PTCA with stent were made; we selected a group of 39 patients in whom the cutting balloon was used (3.3%). Average age was 60.4+/-9.2 years. There were 32 men (80%) and 8 women (20%). Diabetes Mellitus in 10 (25%), dyslipidemia in 18 (45%), systemic hypertension in 22 (55%), smoking in 22 (55%). The indication for coronary angiography was stable angina in 21 (52.5%), unstable angina in 15 (37.5%), acute myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation in 3 (7.5%). RESULTS: We treated 45 lesions: 4 (8.8%) main left, 24 (53.3%) anterior descending, 7 (15.5%) circumflex obtuse, 2 (4.4%) marginal, 8 (17.7%) right coronary. The average lesion severity before treatment was 88.8%+/-11. Lesions encountered corresponded to type B1 in 1 (2.2%), B2 in 22 (48.8%), and C in 22 (48.8%). The average lesion length was 19 mm+/-5.8 mm. The average vessel diameter was 3.6 mm +/-0.46 mm. We achieved a clinical follow-up of 100%. We performed angiographic control in 32 patients (71.1%) to evaluate instent restenosis, with an average follow-up of 7.6+/-3 months. Clinical and angiographic restenosis corresponded to 25 and 31.25% respectively. COMPLICATIONS: Two (6.2%) patients presented complications; one died because of coronary perforation of the right coronary artery with pericardial effusion and tamponade. CONCLUSIONS: The cutting balloon is a useful device for the management of complex lesions (B2 and C) but the restenosis rate with this device is similar to the one obtained with PTCA and stenting. So we do not recommend it for rutine use.

[Binary restenosis post-cutting balloon ptca before stenting]. / Reestenosis binaria post-ACTP con balón de corte previo a la colocación de stent.

UNLABELLED: The goal of the study is to describe our experience in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with cutting balloon, evaluating the immediate and mid-term outcomes. The cutting balloon is a device used as a strategy to promote plaque rupture and to allow for its distribution. METHODS: This is a descriptive study to evaluate the clinical and angiographic restenosis rate (Binary restenosis). Patients with incomplete clinical data were excluded. From January 2003 to June 2004, 1,300 PTCA with stent were made; we selected a group of 39 patients in whom the cutting balloon was used (3.3%). Average age was 60.4+/-9.2 years. There were 32 men (80%) and 8 women (20%). Diabetes Mellitus in 10 (25%), dyslipidemia in 18 (45%), systemic hypertension in 22 (55%), smoking in 22 (55%). The indication for coronary angiography was stable angina in 21 (52.5%), unstable angina in 15 (37.5%), acute myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation in 3 (7.5%). RESULTS: We treated 45 lesions: 4 (8.8%) main left, 24 (53.3%) anterior descending, 7 (15.5%) circumflex obtuse, 2 (4.4%) marginal, 8 (17.7%) right coronary. The average lesion severity before treatment was 88.8%+/-11. Lesions encountered corresponded to type B1 in 1 (2.2%), B2 in 22 (48.8%), and C in 22 (48.8%). The average lesion length was 19 mm+/-5.8 mm. The average vessel diameter was 3.6 mm +/-0.46 mm. We achieved a clinical follow-up of 100%. We performed angiographic control in 32 patients (71.1%) to evaluate instent restenosis, with an average follow-up of 7.6+/-3 months. Clinical and angiographic restenosis corresponded to 25 and 31.25% respectively. COMPLICATIONS: Two (6.2%) patients presented complications; one died because of coronary perforation of the right coronary artery with pericardial effusion and tamponade. CONCLUSIONS: The cutting balloon is a useful device for the management of complex lesions (B2 and C) but the restenosis rate with this device is similar to the one obtained with PTCA and stenting. So we do not recommend it for rutine use.

Alternativas de estimulación cardiaca crónica en pacientes con prótesis mecßnica tricuspÝdea y bloqueo atrioventricular / Alternatives to chronic cardiac stimulation in patients with mechanical tricuspid prosthesis and atrioventricular block

One of the complications of tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) is the complete heart block (CHB). In these patients an epicardial permanent pacemaker is frequently used but its insertion is another major operation and higher thresholds are needed. Two patients are reported, both women, with rheumatic heart disease and TVR who required a permanent pacemaker because they developed CHB. The first patient underwent mitral valve replacement with a disc valve seventeen years before and TVR recently. A single chamber pacemaker was implanted. Left ventricular pacing was achieved through the great cardiac vein. The acute and chronic pacing thresholds were adequate. The second patient underwent tricuspid and mitral replacement with a Starr-Edwards (SE) valve. Eighteen years later this patient had atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response and heart failure. The pacemaker lead had to be inserted across the tricuspid SE valve because ventricle pacing through the coronary veins was unsuccessful. The endocardial pacing resulted in mild tricuspid regurgitation and has continued the same way for four years. To conclude, ventricle pacing through the coronary veins is safe, produces excellent results and fewer complications. On the other hand, ventricle pacing across a prosthetic tricuspid valve remains questionable because of possible damage to the prosthesis itself leading to valve insufficiency and because of damage to the pacing lead.