RESUMO
The CRISPR-Cas [clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and the CRISPR-associated genes (Cas)] system provides defense mechanisms in bacteria and archaea vs. mobile genetic elements (MGEs), such as plasmids and bacteriophages, which can either be harmful or add sequences that can provide virulence or antibiotic resistance. Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium that could be the etiological agent of important soft tissue infections that can lead to bacteremia and sepsis. The role of the CRISPR-Cas system in S. aureus is not completely understood since there is a lack of knowledge about it. We analyzed 716 genomes and 1 genomic island from GENOMES-NCBI and ENA-EMBL searching for the CRISPR-Cas systems and their spacer sequences (SSs). Our bioinformatic analysis shows that only 0.83% (6/716) of the analyzed genomes harbored the CRISPR-Cas system, all of them were subtype III-A, which is characterized by the presence of the cas10/csm1 gene. Analysis of SSs showed that 91% (40/44) had no match to annotated MGEs and 9% of SSs corresponded to plasmids and bacteriophages, indicating that those phages had infected those S. aureus strains. Some of those phages have been proposed as an alternative therapy in biofilm-forming or infection with S. aureus strains, but these findings indicate that such antibiotic phage strategy would be ineffective. More research about the CRISPR/Cas system is necessary for a bigger number of S. aureus strains from different sources, so additional features can be studied.
RESUMO
The objective of this study was to microencapsulate Saccharomyces boulardii using the emulsion technique. To microencapsulate the yeast, alginate sodium blended with inulin and mucilage from Opuntiaficus-indica was used as a coating material. The textural properties of the gels formed by the encapsulating materials and the in vitro viability of the yeast strain in the simulated conditions were studied. Textural profile analyses of the gels revealed differences (p < 0.05) in hardness because alginate produced stronger gels, whereas the incorporation of other hydrocolloids with alginate decreased gel strength and resulted in a more uniform, cohesive gel matrix. When alginate was blended with mucilage and inulin, encapsulated yeast presented higher counts and more viable cells, as compared to free yeast following 30 days of storage at 4 °C. Encapsulated and free yeast had 76.1% and 63.3%, respectively, of cell viability after 35 days of storage.
