Adolescent SBIRT Practices Among Pediatricians in Massachusetts.

OBJECTIVES: Adolescent Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in primary care is a key strategy to prevent, identify, and respond to substance use problems and disorders, including opioid and other drug addictions. Despite substantial investment in recent years to increase its implementation, few studies have reported on recent levels of SBIRT implementation among pediatricians. We aimed to assess self-reported use of the SBIRT framework with adolescent patients among Massachusetts pediatricians, and describe trends since an earlier survey. METHODS: We analyzed responses to a cross-sectional survey mailed in 2017 to a representative sample of pediatricians in Massachusetts. We computed response frequencies for all SBIRT practice questions. We used the chi-square test to compare current data to data collected in 2014, as we found no demographic differences between the 2 samples. RESULTS: Nearly all pediatricians in the 2017 sample (n = 160) reported annual screening of their adolescent patients (99%). The majority reported giving positive reinforcement (87%), brief advice (92%), counseling (90%), and referral to treatment (66%) in response to screen results. Compared with 2014, a significantly higher proportion of pediatricians in 2017 referred patients who screened positively for problematic alcohol use, but perceived barriers to screening and follow-up remain, such as insufficient time to screen and patient refusal to return. CONCLUSIONS: Among respondents to a Massachusetts pediatrician survey, we found high rates of delivering SBIRT in accordance with published guidelines, though barriers remain. Whether the content of the counseling adheres to guidelines is unknown.

Screening Adolescents for Alcohol Use: Tracking Practice Trends of Massachusetts Pediatricians.

OBJECTIVES: Substance use screening is a recommended component of routine healthcare for adolescents. A 2008 survey of Massachusetts primary care physicians found high rates of screening, but low rates of validated tool use, leading to the concern that physicians may be missing substance use-related problems and disorders. In an effort to improve practice, a cross-disciplinary group developed and distributed an adolescent screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment toolkit in 2009. A new survey of Massachusetts primary care physicians was conducted in 2014; this report describes its findings, and compares them to those from 2008. METHODS: A survey was mailed to a randomly selected sample of Massachusetts primary care physicians listed in the state Board of Registration in Medicine database. Item response frequencies were computed. Multiple logistic regression modeling was used to compare 2008 and 2014 responses, while controlling for any demographic differences between samples. RESULTS: Pediatrician respondents in 2014 (analysis N = 130) reported a high rate of annually screening patients for alcohol use (96.2%), but only 56.2% reported using a validated screening tool. Rates of screening and validated tool use were higher in 2014 than 2008. Insufficient knowledge as a reported barrier to screening decreased from 2008 to 2014. However, lack of time or staff resources remained key perceived barriers to screening. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that adolescent alcohol use screening practices among Massachusetts pediatricians have improved in recent years, during a time of national and statewide efforts to educate physicians. However, opportunities for practice improvement remain.

Associations of providers' language and cultural skills with Latino parents' perceptions of well-child care.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the associations of parent-primary care provider language concordance and providers' self-rated cultural competency items with Latino parent report of well-child care quality. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of parents with children 10-50 months old and their children's providers in 3 community health centers. We used the mean scores of quality domains of the Promoting Healthy Development Survey to examine associations of parent-provider language concordance and providers' self-rated cultural competency items with the quality of well-child care provided (all scales range 0-100). RESULTS: Results are based on 462 Latino parent responses and 22 provider responses. Latino parents in language concordant patient-provider relationships did not report higher-quality well-child care. Higher parent-reported quality of care was associated with provider self-reported effectiveness in treating Latino patients in the domains of family-centered care (mean 80.5 vs 70.6; P = .02) and helpfulness of care (mean 84.2 vs 67.9; P = .02). A language-cultural competency summary scale was associated with the domain assessing family risk factors (+11.2 points; P = .02) and its subdomain of emotional assessment (+16.1 points; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Language concordance was not associated with parental reports of quality of well-child care. Provider self-perceived cultural competency was associated with higher scores in domains related to how content is delivered-that is, helpful and family-centered. The language-cultural competency summary score was associated with discussion of sensitive topics. These findings indicate that provider characteristics other than language concordance have greater association with quality of care and may offer opportunities to strengthen cultural competency, even among monolingual providers.

Correlates of therapy use and expenditures in children in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: This paper describes correlates of use and expenditures for therapies (physical, occupational, speech or home health services) among children in the US. METHODS: It is data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationally-representative US sample. The Characteristics of users and describe patterns of expenditures were examined. RESULTS: Use is quite low, only 3.8% of children use services or 4.3% once the use that occurs in the special education system is included. Children more likely to use therapy include those with presumably greater need: children with chronic conditions, functional limitations and/or a history of hospitalizations or injuries. There is significant interaction of minority status and having a functional limitation. Expenditures are low when examined across the child population. Among a small proportion of higher users, therapy expenditures account for a larger proportion of overall health expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: The educational system adds only slightly to the overall rate of use. In general use appears to be related to the need for such services. Some children, likely including racial/ethnic minority children, may under-use services. Lack of insurance is not related to less use, perhaps because there are other ways to get some services (family care or services provided through the public health system) or because not all insurers cover therapy services. Therapy expenditures account for high proportion of overall expenditures among the high user of therapy whereas, for the entire child populations, therapy expenditures account for a very small part of overall health expenditures.

Benefits for employees with children with special needs: findings from the collaborative employee benefit study.

Approximately 13-15 percent of U.S. children have special health care needs. The demands of their caregiving can affect their parents' health and workplace performance. We interviewed forty-one U.S. employers and conducted focus groups with working parents in four U.S. cities to determine the extent to which employers understand the needs of these families and to identify opportunities for improving workplace benefits for these employees beyond health insurance. Employers saw value in improving workforce performance and employee retention through expanded benefits and indicated promising opportunities to improve their response to the needs of employees with children with chronic conditions.