Hypothalamic obesity: Epidemiology in rare sellar/suprasellar tumors-A German claims database analysis.

Hypothalamic obesity (HO) is defined as abnormal weight gain resulting in severe persistent obesity due to physical, tumor- and/or treatment-related damage to the hypothalamus. HO epidemiology is poorly understood. We developed a database algorithm supporting the standardized identification of tumor/treatment-related HO (TTR-HO) patients. The algorithm is used to estimate incidence rates of TTR-HO patients in the German healthcare context from a representative claims database (n = 5.42 million) covering 2010-2020. Patients were identified based on surgery/radiotherapy procedures and HO-associated tumor diagnoses (n = 3976). HO was defined by incident obesity and validated based on incident diabetes insipidus diagnoses and desmopressin prescription within a 12-month period after surgery/radiotherapy. Uncertainty due to algorithm definitions is explored in sensitivity analyses. Estimated annual incidence of TTR-HO in Germany is between 0.7 and 1.7 cases per 1,000,000 persons (2019 prevalence: n = 1262 patients). With observed cases in all age groups, two HO-incidence peaks are identified: children/young adults aged 10-24 years and adults aged 40-44 years. Most frequent HO-validated tumor diagnoses are benign sellar/suprasellar tumors (6.1/1,000,000 persons over 9 years), including tumors of the craniopharyngeal duct (1.3/1,000,000), neoplasms of the pituitary gland (4.1/1,000,000), and nonspecific brain tumors of endocrine glands (2.4/1,000,000). This is the first real-world database analysis of TTR-HO epidemiology, refining current estimates of HO epidemiology and early patient identification. A more comprehensive characterization of patients with HO as well as a better understanding of clinical implications will be crucial in developing optimal treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes.

DEFINING INNOVATION WITH RESPECT TO NEW MEDICINES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW FROM A PAYER PERSPECTIVE.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate how innovation is defined with respect to new medicines. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and EconLit databases were searched for articles published between January 1, 2010 and May 25, 2016 that described a relevant definition of innovation. Identified definitions were analyzed by mapping the concepts described onto a set of ten dimensions of innovation. RESULTS: In total, thirty-six articles were included, and described a total of twenty-five different definitions of innovation. The most commonly occurring dimension was therapeutic benefit, with novelty and the availability of existing treatments the second and third most common dimensions. Overall, there was little agreement in the published literature on what characteristics of new medicines constitute rewardable innovation. CONCLUSIONS: Alignment across countries and among regulators, health technology assessment bodies and payers would help manufacturers define research policies that can drive innovation, but may be challenging, as judgements about what aspects of innovation should be rewarded vary among stakeholders, and depend on political and societal factors.

Approaches to manage 'affordability' of high budget impact medicines in key EU countries.

Background: The launch of hepatitis C (HCV) drugs such as sofosbuvir or ledipasvir has fostered the question of affordability of novel high budget impact therapies even in countries with high domestic product. European countries have developed a variety of mechanisms to improve affordability of such therapies, including 'affordability thresholds', price volume agreements or caps on individual product sales, and special budgets for innovative drugs. While some of these mechanisms may help limit budget impact, there are still significant progresses to be made in the definition and implementation of approaches to ensure affordability, especially in health systems where the growth potential in drug spending and/or in the patient contribution to health insurance are limited. Objectives: In this article, we will review how seven countries in western Europe are approaching the question of affordability of novel therapies and are developing approaches to continue to reward new sciences while limiting budget impact. We will also discuss the question of affordability of cost-effective but hugely expensive therapies and the implications for payers and for the pharmaceutical industry. Results: There is clearly not one solution that is used consistently across countries but rather a number of 'tools' that are combined differently in each country. This illustrates the difficulty of managing affordability within different legal frameworks and within different health care system architectures.

Early Insights from Commercialization of Gene Therapies in Europe.

After years of research and development, gene therapies are now becoming a commercial reality with several products approved by European regulatory authorities [...].

Ethical Hurdles in the Prioritization of Oncology Care.

With finite resources, healthcare payers must make difficult choices regarding spending and the ethical distribution of funds. Here, we describe some of the ethical issues surrounding inequity in healthcare in nine major European countries, using cancer care as an example. To identify relevant studies, we conducted a systematic literature search. The results of the literature review suggest that although prevention, access to early diagnosis, and radiotherapy are key factors associated with good outcomes in oncology, public and political attention often focusses on the availability of pharmacological treatments. In some countries this focus may divert funding towards cancer drugs, for example through specific cancer drugs funds, leading to reduced expenditure on other areas of cancer care, including prevention, and potentially on other diseases. In addition, as highly effective, expensive agents are developed, the use of value-based approaches may lead to unacceptable impacts on health budgets, leading to a potential need to re-evaluate current cost-effectiveness thresholds. We anticipate that the question of how to fund new therapies equitably will become even more challenging in the future, with the advent of expensive, innovative, breakthrough treatments in other therapeutic areas.

Feasibility and attractiveness of indication value-based pricing in key EU countries.

Indication value-based pricing (IBP) has been proposed in the United States as a tool to capture the differential value of drugs across indications or patient groups and is in the early phases of implementation. In Europe, no major country has experimented with IBP or is seriously discussing its use. We assessed how the reimbursement and pricing environment allows for IBP in seven European countries, evaluating both incentives and hurdles. In price setting countries such as France and Germany, the Health Technology Assessment and pricing process already accounts for differences of value across indications. In countries where differential value drives coverage decisions such as the United Kingdom and Sweden, IBP is likely to be used, at least partially, but not in the short-term. Italy is already achieving some form of differential value through managed entry agreements, whereas in Spain the electronic prescription system provides the infrastructure necessary for IBP but other hurdles exist.