Are Bacteria Just Bystanders in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Jaw Conditions?

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether certain bacteria initiate the development of inflammatory jaw conditions, or whether these diseases create a milieu for dysbiosis and secondary colonization of indigenous flora. At present, there are no comparative studies on the types of bacteria that colonize different inflammatory jaw conditions. Accordingly, this study aims to identify and compare the types of bacteria isolated in osteomyelitis, osteoradionecrosis, and MRONJ. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with inflammatory jaw conditions. The predictor variables were classification of bacteria as oral flora, categorized herein as resident bacteria, non-resident bacteria, or opportunistic organisms. The outcome variables were a diagnosis of osteomyelitis, osteoradionecrosis, and MRONJ. Covariates were age, sex, penicillin allergy, a diagnosis of diabetes and a history of smoking. Data analysis was performed using ANOVA and chi-squared tests. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients with inflammatory jaw conditions were enrolled. The final sample size was 69 subjects of which 16 were diagnosed with osteomyelitis, 20 with osteoradionecrosis, and 33 with MRONJ. There was no difference in the frequency that resident bacteria were isolated. Non-resident bacteria, which included Staphylococcus and Enterococcus among others, were isolated more frequently at 75% in osteomyelitis compared to 60% in osteoradionecrosis and 48% in MRONJ cases. There is weak evidence of significant difference when comparing osteomyelitis and MRONJ cases (P = .08). Opportunistic organisms, which included Mycobacterium and Candida, were isolated more frequently in osteoradionecrosis at 30% compared to 12.5% in osteomyelitis and 12.12% in MRONJ cases. There is weak evidence of significant difference when comparing osteoradionecrosis and MRONJ cases (P = .1). CONCLUSION: Non-resident bacteria including Staphylococcus and Enterococcus may be more frequently isolated in patients with osteomyelitis, while opportunistic organisms like Mycobacterium and Candida may be more frequently found in patients diagnosed with osteoradionecrosis.

Molecular methods for diagnosis of odontogenic infections.

PURPOSE: Historically, the identification of microorganisms has been limited to species that could be cultured in the microbiology laboratory. The purpose of the present study was to apply molecular techniques to identify microorganisms in orofacial odontogenic infections (OIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specimens were obtained from subjects with clinical evidence of OI. To identify the microorganisms involved, 16S rRNA sequencing methods were used on clinical specimens. The name and number of the clones of each species identified and the combinations of species present were recorded for each subject. Descriptive statistics were computed for the study variables. RESULTS: Specimens of pus or wound fluid were obtained from 9 subjects. A mean of 7.4 ± 3.7 (standard deviation) species per case were identified. The predominant species detected in the present study that have previously been associated with OIs were Fusobacterium spp, Parvimonas micra, Porphyromonas endodontalis, and Prevotella oris. The predominant species detected in our study that have not been previously associated with OIs were Dialister pneumosintes and Eubacterium brachy. Unculturable phylotypes accounted for 24% of the species identified in our study. All species detected were obligate or facultative anaerobes. Streptococci were not detected. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular methods have enabled us to detect previously cultivated and not-yet-cultivated species in OIs; these methods could change our understanding of the pathogenic flora of orofacial OIs.

What are the antibiotics of choice for odontogenic infections, and how long should the treatment course last?

In the everyday practice of oral and maxillofacial surgeons, empiric antibiotics are prescribed in the face of uncertainty. Is there a highly resistant organism present? Are the old-line antibiotics no longer effective? Should a broad-spectrum antibiotic be used just to cover all the bases in this case? The surprising result of this systematic review is that when combined with appropriate surgery, the usual antibiotics are all effective. Safety and cost become the differentiating factors in this clinical decision.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery for the pregnant patient.

This article describes clinical approaches for the perioperative management of the pregnant oral and maxillofacial surgical patient. The following topics are discussed: ethical principles of treatment during pregnancy, physiologic changes and their treatment considerations, fetal and maternal risks of various medications, medical problems occurring during pregnancy, and common minimally invasive approaches that the surgeon can apply to minimize the risk to the mother and unborn child. The strategies discussed provide successful treatment outcomes during this important time in the female surgical patient's life.

Severe odontogenic infections, part 2: prospective outcomes study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify significant predictors of 4 outcomes in patients with severe odontogenic infections: abscess formation, penicillin therapeutic failure (PTF), length of hospital stay (LOS), and need for reoperation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used a prospective case series study design and enrolled 37 consecutive patients admitted for severe odontogenic infection between March 1996 and June 1999. Treatment consisted of intravenous penicillin (PCN) or clindamycin in PCN-allergic patients, surgical incision and drainage, and extraction(s) as soon as possible. Study variables were categorized as demographic, preadmission, time-related, preoperative, anatomic, treatment, microbiologic, and complications. The primary outcome variables were abscess formation, PTF, LOS, and reoperation. Multivariate linear and logistic regression techniques were used to measure associations between study variables and the outcome variables. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 37 subjects (23 male, 14 female) with a mean age of 34.9 +/- 15.8 years. Multivariate analyses, controlling for confounding variables, indicated that culture of Peptostreptococci was a negative predictor of abscess formation. LOS was predicted by the number of infected spaces and duration of operation. There was no significant predictor of PTF or reoperation on multivariate analysis, although PCN-resistant organisms were isolated in all cases of PTF. CONCLUSION: Increased LOS in severe odontogenic infections is predicted by the anatomic extent and severity of the infection and the occurrence of complications such as PTF and the need for reoperation. PTF is significantly associated with later identification of PCN-resistant organisms. The role of Peptostreptococci in abscess formation warrants further investigation.

Severe odontogenic infections, part 1: prospective report.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate a series of patients with severe odontogenic infections (OI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 37 consecutive hospitalized patients with odontogenic infection were treated with intravenous penicillin (PCN) (unless allergic), and prompt incision and drainage. Standardized data collection included demographic, preadmission, time-related, preoperative, anatomic, treatment, microbiologic, and complications information. Appropriate descriptive statistics were computed. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 37 subjects (38% female) with a mean age of 34.9 years. Three subjects (8%) had immunocompromising diseases. Caries was the most frequent dental disease (65%) and the lower third molar was the most frequently involved tooth (68%). Trismus and dysphagia were present on admission in over 70% of cases. The masticator, perimandibular (submandibular, submental, and/or sublingual), and peripharyngeal (lateral pharyngeal, retropharyngeal, and/or pretracheal) spaces were infected in 78%, 60%, and 43% of cases, respectively. Abscess was found in 76% of cases. PCN-resistant organisms were identified in 19% of all strains isolated and in 54% of patients with sensitivity data. PCN therapeutic failure occurred in 21% of cases and reoperation was required in 8%. Length of hospital stay was 5.1 +/- 3.0 days. No deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that PCN resistance, resulting in PCN therapeutic failure, was unacceptably high in this sample. Alternative antibiotics, such as clindamycin, should be considered in hospitalized patients with OI. Masticator space infection occurred much more frequently than previously reported. Trismus and dysphagia should be appreciated as significant indicators of severe OI.

The gene: the polymerase chain reaction and its clinical application.

Chromosomal DNA transfers and stores information regarding the structure and function of the cell. Genetic information, encoded within sequences of nucleotides that compose DNA, is grouped into functional units called genes. Genetic diseases are caused by changes in the chromosomal DNA, leading to a change in the quantity or function of the protein gene product. In the past, genetic diagnosis was limited by the availability of sufficient quantity and quality of DNA and the absence of an efficient amplification procedure. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR), an inexpensive, rapid, and accurate means of amplifying DNA, is already making a major contribution to the diagnostic sciences. PCR techniques have been widely used in diverse applications, including molecular analysis of microbial pathogens, inheritable diseases and syndromes, and neoplasms. The purpose of this article is to 1) Review gene structure and function, 2) review principles of PCR technology and its applications in molecular biology, and 3) discuss an experimental clinical application of PCR to identify novel infectious agents responsible for odontogenic infections.