Cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions grades 1 and 2: value of an alternative morphological classification and of p16 immunohistochemistry in the prediction of clinical outcome / Lesões intraepiteliais escamosas cervicais graus 1 e 2: valor de uma classificação morfológica alternativa e do estudo imuno-histoquímico com p16 na predição do desfecho clínico

ABSTRACT Introduction: Diagnostic reproducibility and determination of prognostic factors in cervical intraepithelial neoplasias grades 1 and 2 are still relevant problems in the daily practice of gynecological histopathology. Objective: To correlate the value of morphological reclassification and of p16 immunoexpression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasias grades 1 and 2 with clinical outcome. Materials and methods: Sixty-six patients were included (34 with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1, and 32 with grade 2); an immunohistochemical study with p16 and reclassification according to the Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) Consensus and by the alternative proposal of Herfs and Crum were done; unfavorable outcome was defined as a subsequent histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Results: We observed superior performance of the alternative morphological classification (p = 0.002) to determine unfavorable outcome. We also detected superior performance of p16 in the same determination (p = 0.002). Conclusion: The use of an alternative morphological classification is promising; in the context of the use of immunohistochemical antibodies as biomarkers, p16 showed good sensitivity and negative predictive value in the determination of cases in which the outcome was unfavorable.

RESUMO Introdução: A reproducibilidade diagnóstica e a determinação de fatores prognósticos em neoplasias intraepiteliais cervicais graus 1 e 2 ainda são problemas relevantes na prática diária da histopatologia ginecológica. Objetivo: Correlacionar o valor da reclassificação morfológica e da imunoexpressão do marcador p16 em neoplasias intraepiteliais cervicais graus 1 e 2 com o desfecho clínico. Materiais e métodos: Incluídas 66 pacientes (34 com neoplasia intraepitelial cervical grau 1 e 32 com grau 2); realizou-se estudo imuno-histoquímico com p16 e reclassificação segundo o Consenso Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) e a proposta alternativa de Herfs e Crum; desfecho desfavorável foi definido como diagnóstico histológico subsequente de neoplasia intraepitelial cervical grau 3 ou carcinoma de células escamosas invasivo. Resultados: Observamos performance superior da classificação morfológica alternativa (p = 0,002) para determinação de desfecho desfavorável. Também detectamos performance superior do marcador p16 na mesma determinação (p = 0,002). Conclusão: A utilização de uma classificação morfológica alternativa é promissora. No âmbito da utilização dos anticorpos imuno-histoquímicos como biomarcadores, o p16 apresentou boa sensibilidade e valor preditivo negativo na determinação dos casos em que o desfecho foi desfavorável.

Cell-cycle analysis and apoptosis-associated proteins in cervical lesions of Brazilian women.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to detect the relative expressions of p53, p21(Waf1/Cip1), p27(Kip1) Bcl-2 and cleaved caspase-3 in cervical lesion samples from Brazilian women by immunohistochemistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 230 cervical biopsies in paraffin-embedded blocks were studied: 43 were invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), 52 carcinomas in situ/cervical intraepithelial neoplasias III (CIN III), 54 cervical intraepithelial neoplasias II (CIN II), 51 cervical intraepithelial neoplasias I (CIN I) and 30 non-neoplastic lesions (NN) with benign cellular changes. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the p53 expression between the different groups: NN and CIN I (p=0.010); NN and CIN II (p<0.00001); CIN II and CIN III (p=0.02); CIN II and CIS (p=0.0220); CIN II and CEC (p=0.010). Regarding p21(WAF1/Cip1), significant differences were observed between NN and CEC (p=0.001); CIN I and CEC (p=0.001); CIN II and CIN III (p=0,001); CIN II and CIS (p=0.0004) and CIN II and CEC (p<0.0001). For p27(Kip1), significant differences were observed between NN and CIN I (p<0.00001); NN and CIN II (p<0.00001); NN and CIS (p=0.038); CIN I and CIN III (p=0.001); CIN I and CIS (p=0.009); CIN I and CEC (p=0.0001); CIN II and CIN III (p=0.0003); CIN II and CIS (p=0.002); CIN II and CEC (p< 0.00001). Bcl-2 and caspase-3 did not show remarkable differences between groups. CONCLUSION: p53, p21(WAF1/CIP1), p27(KIP1) appear to be involved in the course of carcinogenesis. Rare expression of Bcl-2 and cleaved caspase-3 suggests that these proteins probably do not participate in cervical apoptosis.

Immunohistochemical expression of p16(INK4A) in normal uterine cervix, nonneoplastic epithelial lesions, and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors analyzed the immunoexpression of p16 in high-risk human papillomavirus DNA-negative normal and nonneoplastic cervical epithelia, in low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), high-grade CIN, and squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study, in which 58 normal cervical hysterectomy samples, 56 nonneoplastic cervical biopsies, 88 CIN 1, 33 CIN 2, 32 CIN 3, and 47 invasive squamous cell carcinoma biopsies, were evaluated for p16 immunoexpression. Human papillomavirus tests were also performed. RESULTS: p16 immunohistochemistry seems to reveal possible different biological subgroups of lesions among morphologically similar mildly dysplastic cervical epithelia. CONCLUSION: Distribution patterns of p16 protein might be useful to predict different outcomes in CIN 1.