Autologous stem cell transplant plus interleukin-2 for breast cancer: review and nursing management.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To review the role of transplantation in breast cancer and describe the experience of one bone marrow transplant (BMT) program using autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) for the treatment of breast cancer. DATA SOURCES: Published articles, chart review, personal experience. DATA SYNTHESIS: Toxicities experienced by patients on this autologous PBSCT protocol that can be ascribed to low-dose IL-2 included nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, and skin rash. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequently occurring toxicities associated with low-dose IL-2 are not life-threatening. They do, however, affect the patient's quality of life and are toxicities that should be amenable to nursing interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Oncology nurses must be aware of the side effects of different combination therapies (e.g., BMT, biotherapy). Nursing research is needed concerning the management of these toxicities when they occur because of combination therapies.

Interleukin-2-activated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for breast cancer: investigation of dose level with clinical correlates.

Incubating hematopoietic stem cells with IL-2 in vitro for 24 h generates cytotoxic T cells. When infused into patients, these cells may stimulate a graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect. This clinical trial was designed to assess the ability of IL-2 activated peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) to reconstitute hematopoiesis, to investigate dose levels and dose-limiting toxicities of IL-2, and to evaluate clinical results and preliminary laboratory effects using a combination of IL-2-activated autologous PBSC followed by IL-2 after transplantation. Sixty-one women with stage II-IV breast cancer were treated. After the administration of carboplatin (200 mg/m2/day for 3 days) and cyclophosphamide (2 g/m2/day for 3 days), patients received autologous PBSC that were cultured in IL-2 for 24 h followed by parenteral administration of IL-2 beginning the day of transplantation. Three escalating doses of IL-2 were evaluated with increasing duration up to 4 weeks. Of the 57 patients receiving IL-2 after tranplantation, 19 patients (33.3%) were unable to complete the planned course of IL-2 therapy due to persistent fevers (n = 9), diarrhea (n = 2), pulmonary capillary leak syndrome (n = 3), development of a rash (n = 1), atrial fibrillation (n = 1), or patient's request (n = 3). One death occurred during hospitalization. Engraftment of neutrophils occurred on day 11.5 (mean; range 8-21 days) and platelets on day 11.7 (mean; range 7-33 days). The maximal tolerated dose of IL-2 was 6 x 10(5) IU/m2/day for 4 weeks. Disease-free survival rates for all stages were comparable to current reports in the literature. Preliminary laboratory evaluations include FACScan analysis of the IL-2 activated PBSC demonstrating an increased percentage of CD3+, CD25+, HLA-DR+ T cells. Phenotypically similar cells were present in peripheral blood samples of patients when tested 15 days after transplantation. This study demonstrates successful engraftment with IL-2-activated PBSC after high-dose chemotherapy for women with stage II-IV breast cancer. The regimen is feasible and, although toxicities are common, they are manageable and correlate with increasing dose and duration of IL-2.

Phase I-II trial of high-dose cyclophosphamide, carboplatin and autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell rescue.

In an effort to evaluate the toxicities and anti-tumor efficacy of the combination of high-dose cyclophosphamide (CY) and carboplatin, we undertook a phase I-II trial with autologous bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) rescue for patients with solid tumors. Forty three patients, 39 of whom had either high risk stage II or III or metastatic breast cancer were treated with escalating doses of carboplatin 1200-1800 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4800-6000 mg/m2 over 3 days followed by autologous BM or PBSC infusion. No life-threatening or fatal toxicities were observed. Reversible congestive heart failure was seen in two patients. Transient hepatotoxicity, characterized primarily by elevation of transaminase levels, and nausea and vomiting, adequately managed with anti-emetic therapy, were seen in 39 and 40 of 43 patients, respectively. The 14 month post-transplant probability of relapse-free survival for 26 patients with high risk II-III breast cancer was 79%; for 13 patients with metastatic disease, the 22 month relapse-free survival probability was 23%. High-dose carboplatin and CY at maximally administered doses of 1800 mg/m2 and 6000 mg/m2 is a well tolerated preparative transplant regimen for autologous BM or PBSC transplantation. It appears to have similar anti-tumor activity and an improved safety profile when compared with other commonly employed transplant preparative regimens.

Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of oral ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with fractionated total-body irradiation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate oral ondansetron in the prevention of total-body irradiation (TBI)-induced nausea and vomiting. METHODS: Twenty patients who received 4 days of TBI as part of their preparative regimen before bone marrow transplantation were randomized to receive either 8-mg oral doses of ondansetron or placebo. Administration of drug was double-blinded. Initial rescue therapy consisted of intravenous (i.v.) ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg following two or more emetic episodes between successive fractions of TBI or five total emetic episodes during the 4 days of therapy. If, after receipt of i.v. ondansetron, patients had two or more emetic episodes between fractions of TBI or five total emetic episodes, additional antiemetics were administered. RESULTS: Patients who received oral ondansetron had significantly fewer emetic episodes compared with those who received placebo (P = .005) over the entire 4-day study period. Oral ondansetron was also significantly superior to placebo with respect to the time of onset of emesis or rescue (P = .003). Six of 10 patients treated with oral ondansetron completed the study without additional antiemetic therapy, while none of 10 patients who received placebo completed the study without rescue antiemetic therapy. Six placebo patients who received initial rescue therapy with i.v. ondansetron required no additional antiemetics. No relationships were apparent between peak ondansetron concentration (Cmax) or area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) and number of emetic episodes. CONCLUSION: Oral ondansetron is an effective therapy for the prevention of emesis induced by TBI.