Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Contraception ; 88(1): 37-40, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23375352

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Potential pain with IUD insertion is a concern for women. Studies have found that systemic and local cervical therapies do not reduce pain scores. Since intrauterine infusion of lidocaine may reduce pain with endometrial aspiration, in this pilot study, we tested whether such infusion through an inexpensive endometrial aspirator could reduce IUD insertion pain scores with IUD insertion. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo control pilot study of 40 women undergoing IUD insertion, pain scores of women receiving 1.2 mL 2% lidocaine versus normal saline (1:1) infused 3 min prior to IUD insertion were measured using a 0-9-point scale. RESULTS: Pain at tenaculum placement was similar between groups. There was no difference in mean pain scores during IUD insertion of women infused with lidocaine (2.95) versus normal saline (3.75), p=.37. Considerable variation in pain scores was noted; 46% of subjects had pain scores ≤2 while 33% had pain scores ≥5. CONCLUSION: Use of 2% lidocaine administered through an endometrial aspirator did not significantly reduce IUD insertion pain scores in this pilot study.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/efeitos adversos , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Administração Intravaginal , Adulto , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Parenterais , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre/efeitos adversos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/efeitos adversos , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Ambulatório Hospitalar , Medição da Dor , Projetos Piloto , Curetagem a Vácuo/instrumentação , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...