Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 11(7): 675-682, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33575064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is frequently used to manage caloric needs during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Previous studies in transplant patients who received TPN have reported widely discordant results with regard to infection and mortality, and risk factors for TPN-related infection remain unclear. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study of all HSCT recipients treated with TPN between 2005 to 2014 at Northwestern Memorial Hospital to determine the incidence and epidemiology of infections. Electronic records were used to identify patients treated with TPN for at least 2 days who developed infection. RESULTS: Among 198 patients treated with TPN, 30% developed documented infection. Total parenteral nutrition treatment duration (13 vs. 7 days; p < .0001) and the timing of TPN initiation (> day 9 post HSCT; p < .0001) were significantly higher in patients who received TPN and developed infection. Receipt of an allogeneic transplant was associated with increased risk for infection (p < .0138), and day 60 mortality was significantly higher in TPN-treated patients with infection (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Stem cell recipients who receive TPN, especially from an allogeneic donor, have high rates of infection and mortality. Minimizing TPN exposure may reduce the chance for infection.

2.
Clin Transplant ; 29(12): 1128-32, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26493022

RESUMO

After a hospital-wide formulary change resulted in the replacement of filgrastim with TBO-filgrastim for all on- and off-label indications, we performed a retrospective comparison of patients with myeloma receiving 200 mg/m(2) melphalan with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to see whether the type of growth factor used post-transplant made a difference. One hundred and eighty-two consecutive patients with myeloma were studied, 91 receiving filgrastim immediately prior to the change and 91 receiving TBO-filgrastim afterward. The CD34(+) cell dose was comparable, as were other characteristics. Although the overall time to neutrophil recovery was similar for both groups, early engraftment (≤ 12 d) occurred more often (p = 0.05), and late engraftment (≥ 14 d) less often (p = 0.09) in filgrastim-treated patients. The number of documented infections was significantly less in the TBO-filgrastim group. Day 100 mortality and hospital stay were similar for the two groups. These data indicate that there is no material difference between filgrastim and TBO-filgrastim in this clinical setting.


Assuntos
Filgrastim/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Hematológicos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Mieloma Múltiplo/complicações , Neutropenia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Neutropenia/etiologia , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Autólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...