Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hernia ; 21(1): 9-16, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27889845

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The use of absorbable polylactic acid hook self-gripping polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia may potentially reduce operative time and enhance patient recovery. The objective of this randomized trial is to compare the outcomes following self-gripping mesh repair to polypropylene mesh secured with sutures in open inguinal hernioplasty. METHOD: Eligible patients aged 18-80 years old, who had primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia, were randomized into either Polypropylene (PL) group or PROGRIP (PG) group just before the placement of mesh intra-operatively by computer generated code. The primary outcome was the time from mesh placement to end of operation, whereas secondary outcomes included the total operative time, amount of analgesic used, length of post-operative stay, seroma formation, chronic discomfort, chronic pain score and recurrence. The study has been registered in http://www.clinicaltrial.gov carrying an ID of NCT00960011. Patients were followed-up in outpatient clinic for up to 6 years after operation. RESULTS: From March 2009 to April 2016, 45 patients were included. The mean age of PG group (n = 22) was 62.0 ± 15.7 years old while that of the PL group was 62.6 ± 4.9 years old (n = 23). There was no significant difference regarding the smoking habit, drinking habit, comorbidities, previous hernia operation and Nyhus type of hernia between the two groups. The size of defects, the time of groin dissection and the size of incision were similar. In the PG group, there was significant reduction in the time for mesh placement (11.8 ± 3.1 vs. 21.0 ± 6.2 min, p < 0.001) and total operative time (39.2 ± 9.8 vs. 47.7 ± 8.0 min, p = 0.003). There was one recurrence in PL group and nil in PG group. Although there was a significant difference in paresthesia between 2 groups after operation, the difference disappears with time and comparable from post-operative 1 year onwards. There was no difference in chronic pain, chronic discomfort, affect daily activities, palpable mesh demonstrated throughout the whole study period till 6 years after operation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of polylactic acid self-gripping mesh in open inguinal hernia repair effectively reduces the operating time with comparable long-term surgical outcome with traditional polypropylene mesh.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Telas Cirúrgicas , Implantes Absorvíveis , Idoso , Materiais Biocompatíveis , Feminino , Seguimentos , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Poliésteres , Polipropilenos , Técnicas de Sutura
2.
Br J Surg ; 103(11): 1447-52, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27654648

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chewing gum may enhance intestinal motility after surgery. This trial studied whether chewing gum could lead to a further reduction in ileus in patients who had a laparoscopic colorectal resection and followed an enhanced recovery programme. METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection were randomized to a control or intervention group. Patients in the control group received a standardized recovery programme. Patients in the intervention group were, in addition, given chewing gum three times daily from day 1 until discharge. Primary outcome measures were time to first flatus and first bowel motion. Time to feeling hungry and hospital stay were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were randomized into each group. Thirty-seven patients underwent rectal resection and 45 had a colonic resection. Time to passage of flatus was shorter (18 versus 34 h; P = 0·007), first bowel motion occurred earlier (19 versus 44 h; P = 0·001) and time to feeling hungry was earlier (16 versus 25 h; P = 0·001) in the intervention group. There was no difference in the duration of hospital stay (5 days in the intervention group versus 5·5 days in the control group). Subgroup analyses revealed that the benefits of chewing gum were clearer in patients who had a colonic resection, with a shorter time to first flatus (20 versus 35 h; P = 0·043), first bowel motion (19 versus 53 h; P = 0·014) and feeling hungry (14 versus 40 h; P = 0·001). No adverse events were attributed to chewing gum. CONCLUSION: Chewing gum is a simple intervention that speeds intestinal transit in patients managed with a recovery programme after laparoscopic colorectal resection. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02419586 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/).


Assuntos
Goma de Mascar , Colo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Reto/cirurgia , Idoso , Feminino , Flatulência/fisiopatologia , Trânsito Gastrointestinal/fisiologia , Humanos , Fome/fisiologia , Íleus/prevenção & controle , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/fisiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...