End-of-life decision making by adolescents, parents, and healthcare providers in pediatric oncology: research to evidence-based practice guidelines.

Participating in end-of-life decisions is life altering for adolescents with incurable cancer, their families, and their healthcare providers. However, no empirically developed and validated guidelines to assist patients, parents, and healthcare providers in making these decisions exist. The purpose of the work reported here was to use three sources (the findings of three studies on decision making in pediatric oncology, published literature, and recommendations from professional associations) to develop guidelines for end-of-life decision making in pediatric oncology. The study designs include a retrospective, descriptive design (Study 1); a prospective, descriptive design (Study 2); and a cross-sectional, descriptive design (Study 3). Settings for the pediatric oncology studies included a pediatric catastrophic illness research hospital located in the Midsouth (Studies 1 and 2); and that setting plus a children's hospital in Australia and one in Hong Kong (Study 3). Study samples included 39 guardians and 21 healthcare providers (Study 1); 52 parents, 10 adolescents, and 22 physicians (Study 2); and 43 parents (Study 3). All participants in the studies responded to six open-ended questions. A semantic content analysis technique was used to analyze all interview data. Four nurses independently coded each interview; interrater reliability per code ranged from 68% to 100% across studies. The most frequently reported influencing factors were "information on the health and disease status of the patient," "all curative options having been attempted," "trusting the healthcare team," and "feeling support from the healthcare provider." The agreement across studies regarding influencing factors provides the basis for the research-based guidelines for end-of-life decision making in pediatric oncology. The guidelines offer assistance with end-of-life decision making in a structured manner that can be formally evaluated and individualized to meet patient and family needs.

Peak and nadir experiences and their consequences described by pediatric oncology nurses.

Pediatric oncology nurses experience role-related stressors, some of which are inherent to the speciality, and their consequences. Despite these difficulties, nurses continue in the specialty. One variable that helps to explain their continued commitment is "meaning", or what pediatric oncology nurses find to be most significant and satisfying in their roles. One technique for determining meaning in a role is to inquire about the peak (significant and positive) and nadir (significant and negative) role-related experiences and the consequences of both kinds of experiences. The purpose of this study was to identify the peak and nadir experiences of pediatric oncology nurses and the short- and long-term consequences of those experiences. Using an interview format that consisted of four open-ended questions and a convenience sampling plan, five nurses interviewed 26 nurses from one pediatric cancer center and 38 nurses from a national sample. The interviewers completed an initial training session on interviewing and repeated that training two more times during data collection. Written or taped oral consent was obtained at the time of each interview. Using a content analytical technique (Krippendorff, 1980), four nurses independently coded each interview. Agreement ratings ranged from 75% to 100% per coded theme for an overall agreement level of 92%. Training for the coding process occurred initially and periodically throughout the analysis period. Fifteen different themes for peak experiences were identified, the majority of which reflect the nurses' experience with patients dying, or with patients recovering and living normal lives, or with the close relationships that develop between nurses and patients. Multiple short- and long-term consequences were identified and included changes in (1) values (becoming less judgmental), (2) behaviors (giving more empathic care), and (3) perspective (accepting limitations of care). Twenty-three different nadir themes were identified. A shared characteristic of several of these themes is the nurses' regret over a perceived inadequacy in handling a situation. Another common element is witnessing patient suffering and feeling unable to adequately relieve the suffering or provide comfort to the patient. The short-term consequences of nadir experiences tend to be negative and include guilt, anger, or dread. The long-term consequences tend to be positive and similar to the long-term consequences of peak experiences. Study findings indicate that pediatric oncology nurses do find meaning in their roles and that those who continue in the speciality are able to experience positive long-term consequences. Study findings will be used to develop a new scale to measure role-related meaning and to develop interventions designed to assist nurses in finding meaning in their roles even during particularly stressful periods.

Decision making by parents and healthcare professionals when considering continued care for pediatric patients with cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To better define the treatment-related decisions considered most difficult by parents of pediatric patients with cancer and the factors that influenced their final decisions. DESIGN: Retrospective-descriptive design. SETTING: Pediatric oncology institution in the mid-southern region on the United States. SAMPLE: 39 parents representing 37 of 83 eligible families, 16 attending physicians, three nurses, and two chaplains. METHODS: Parent participants responded by telephone to six open-ended interview questions and a 15-item questionnaire about factors that were important when making the decision to continue care. Healthcare professionals were interviewed face-to-face. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Most difficult treatment-related decisions; factors influencing decision making. FINDINGS: Parents reported 15 types of difficult decisions, the majority of which were made late in the course of treatment. Deciding between a phase I drug study or no further treatment (n = 14), maintaining or withdrawing life support (n = 11), and giving more chemotherapy or giving no further treatment (n = 8) were the most frequently reported difficult decisions. Parents rated "recommendations received from healthcare professionals" as the questionnaire factor most important in their decision making, and healthcare professionals rated "discussion with the family of the patient" as the most important factor. CONCLUSION: Parents of children or adolescents with cancer and their healthcare providers face difficult treatment-related decisions, many of which occur late in the course of treatment. Parents and healthcare professionals cite similar factors in their decision making but differ in their ratings of the factors' importance. For parents, the information and recommendations they receive from healthcare professionals figure most frequently and most importantly in their decision making. For healthcare professionals, the certainty that the patient will not get better and discussions with the patient's family figure most importantly in their decision making. Once parents conclude that their child can not get better, they are more likely to choose noncurative options such as choosing no further treatment or withdrawing life support. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses can help determine what information parents need in their decision making. Particular attention must be given to ways to communicate the likelihood of the their child's survival.