Tracheostomy-related durable medical equipment: Insurance coverage, gaps, and barriers.

PURPOSE: Tracheostomy care is supply- and resource-intensive, and airway-related adverse events in community settings have high rates of readmission and mortality. Devices are often implicated in harm, but little is known about insurance coverage, gaps, and barriers to obtaining tracheostomy-related medically necessary durable medical equipment. We aimed to identify barriers patients may encounter in procuring tracheostomy-related durable medical equipment through insurance plan coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tracheostomy-related durable medical equipment provisions were evaluated across insurers, extracting data via structured telephone interviews and web-based searches. Each insurance company was contacted four times and queried iteratively regarding the range of coverage and co-pay policies. Outcome measures include call duration, consistency of explanation of benefits, and the number of transfers and disconnects. We also identified six qualitative themes from patient interviews. RESULTS: Tracheostomy-related durable medical equipment coverage was offered in some form by 98.1 % (53/54) of plans across 11 insurers studied. Co-pays or deductibles were required in 42.6 % (23/54). There was significant variability in out-of-pocket expenditures. Fixed co-pays ranged from $0-30, and floating co-pays ranged from 0 to 40 %. During phone interviews, mean call duration was 19 ± 10 min, with an average of 2 ± 1 transfers between agents. Repeated calls revealed high information variability (mean score 2.4 ± 1.5). Insurance sites proved challenging to navigate, scoring poorly on usability, literacy, and information quality. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors may limit access to potentially life-saving durable medical equipment for patients with tracheostomy. Barriers include out-of-pocket expenditures, lack of transparency on coverage, and low-quality information. Further research is necessary to evaluate patient outcomes.

Lipoprotein(a) concentrations in acute myocardial infarction patients are not indicative of levels at six month follow-up.

Aims: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are generally constant throughout an individual's lifetime, and current guidelines recommend that a single measurement is sufficient to assess the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, it is unclear whether a single measurement of Lp(a) in individuals with acute myocardial infarction (MI) is indicative of the Lp(a) level six months following the event. Methods and results: Lp(a) levels were obtained from individuals with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n = 99) within 24 h of hospital admission and after six months, who were enrolled in two randomized trials of evolocumab and placebo, and in individuals with NSTEMI or STEMI (n = 9) who enrolled in a small observation arm of the two protocols and did not receive study drug, but whose levels were obtained at the same time points. Median Lp(a) levels increased from 53.5 nmol/L (19, 165) during hospital admission to 58.0 nmol/L (14.8, 176.8) six months after the acute infarction (P = 0.02). Subgroup analysis demonstrated no difference in the baseline, six-month, or change between the baseline and six-month Lp(a) values between the STEMI and NSTEMI groups and between the group which received evolocumab and the group that did not. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that Lp(a) levels in individuals with acute MI are significantly higher six months after the initial event. Therefore, a single measurement of Lp(a) in the peri-infarction setting is not sufficient to predict the Lp(a)-associated CAD risk in the post-infarction period. Registration: Evolocumab in Acute Coronary Syndrome Trial [EVACS I] NCT03515304, Evolocumab in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [EVACS II], NCT04082442.

The Trajectory of Lipoprotein(a) During the Peri- and Early Postinfarction Period and the Impact of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibition.

Lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), levels and the effect of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition on Lp(a) during the peri-infarction and early postinfarction period are not well characterized. This study aimed to describe the trajectory of Lp(a), as well as the effect of PCSK9 inhibition on that trajectory during the peri-infarction and early postinfarction period. Lp(a) levels were obtained within 24 hours of hospital admission as well as within 24 hours of hospital discharge and at 30 days from 74 participants who presented with a NSTEMI (troponin I >5 ng/ml) or with a STEMI and were enrolled in 2 randomized, double-blind trials of evolocumab and placebo (Evolocumab in Acute Coronary Syndrome [EVACS I]; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03515304 and Evolocumab in Patients With STEMI [EVACS II]; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04082442). There was a significant increase from the pretreatment level in the placebo-treated patients, from 64 (41,187) nmol/L to 80 (47, 172) nmol/L at hospital discharge and to 82 (37, 265) at 30 days. This was primarily driven by the results from participants with high Lp(a) at hospital admission (>75 nmol/L) in whom the median increase was 28% as compared with a 10% increase in those with pretreatment Lp(a) of <75 nmol/L. In contrast, there was no significant change from the pretreatment level in the evolocumab-treated patients regardless of pretreatment Lp(a) levels. In conclusion, Lp(a) rises during the peri-infarction and early postinfarction period in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The increase was prevented by a single dose of subcutaneous evolocumab given within 24 hours of hospital admission.

Chirality and asymmetry increase the potency of candidate ADRM1/RPN13 inhibitors.

Bortezomib and the other licensed 20S proteasome inhibitors show robust activity against liquid tumors like multiple myeloma, but have disappointed against solid tumors including ovarian cancer. Consequently, interest is mounting in alternative non-peptide based drugs targeting the proteasome's 19S regulatory particle subunit, including its ubiquitin receptor RPN13. RA183 and RA375 are more potent analogs of the prototypic inhibitor of RPN13 (iRPN13) called RA190, and they show promise for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Here we demonstrate that rendering these candidate RPN13 inhibitors chiral and asymmetric through the addition of a single methyl to the core piperidone moiety increases their potency against cancer cell lines, with the S-isomer being more active than the R-isomer. The enhanced cancer cell cytotoxicities of these compounds are associated with improved binding to RPN13 in cell lysates, ATP depletion by inhibition of glycolysis and mitochondrial electron chain transport, mitochondrial depolarization and perinuclear clustering, oxidative stress and glutathione depletion, and rapid accumulation of high molecular weight polyubiquitinated proteins with a consequent unresolved ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) stress response. Cytotoxicity was associated with an early biomarker of apoptosis, increased surface annexin V binding. As for cisplatin, BRCA2 and ATM deficiency conferred increased sensitivity to these iRPN13s. Ubiquitination plays an important role in coordinating DNA damage repair and the iRPN13s may compromise this process by depletion of monomeric ubiquitin following its sequestration in high molecular weight polyubiquitinated protein aggregates. Indeed, a synergistic cytotoxic response was evident upon treatment of several ovarian cancer cell lines with either cisplatin or doxorubicin and our new candidate iRPN13s, suggesting that such a combination approach warrants further exploration for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Structure-function analyses of candidate small molecule RPN13 inhibitors with antitumor properties.

We sought to design ubiquitin-proteasome system inhibitors active against solid cancers by targeting ubiquitin receptor RPN13 within the proteasome's 19S regulatory particle. The prototypic bis-benzylidine piperidone-based inhibitor RA190 is a michael acceptor that adducts Cysteine 88 of RPN13. In probing the pharmacophore, we showed the benefit of the central nitrogen-bearing piperidone ring moiety compared to a cyclohexanone, the importance of the span of the aromatic wings from the central enone-piperidone ring, the contribution of both wings, and that substituents with stronger electron withdrawing groups were more cytotoxic. Potency was further enhanced by coupling of a second warhead to the central nitrogen-bearing piperidone as RA375 exhibited ten-fold greater activity against cancer lines than RA190, reflecting its nitro ring substituents and the addition of a chloroacetamide warhead. Treatment with RA375 caused a rapid and profound accumulation of high molecular weight polyubiquitinated proteins and reduced intracellular glutathione levels, which produce endoplasmic reticulum and oxidative stress, and trigger apoptosis. RA375 was highly active against cell lines of multiple myeloma and diverse solid cancers, and demonstrated a wide therapeutic window against normal cells. For cervical and head and neck cancer cell lines, those associated with human papillomavirus were significantly more sensitive to RA375. While ARID1A-deficiency also enhanced sensitivity 4-fold, RA375 was active against all ovarian cancer cell lines tested. RA375 inhibited proteasome function in muscle for >72h after single i.p. administration to mice, and treatment reduced tumor burden and extended survival in mice carrying an orthotopic human xenograft derived from a clear cell ovarian carcinoma.