RESUMO
Aortic annuloplasty has been clearly demonstrated to have a protective influence in aortic valve repair. Over the past 20 years, different annuloplasty concepts have been proposed by different groups. However, the most appropriate approach to enable long-term annular stability remains highly controversial. The aim of this article is to give a general overview of all types of aortic annuloplasty, particularly focusing on the use of an external Teflon ring, as proposed by our group. In this technique, external root dissection is performed in the same fashion as for reimplantation; the only difference is that it is necessary to go below the coronary ostia take-off. A series of pledgeted sutures (usually between 6 and 9 sutures) are placed at the level of the virtual basal ring. The external ring is made using a Teflon strip with a length of 8 to 9 cm, to reduce the annulus to a diameter of between 21 and 23 mm. The sub-annular sutures are then passed at the appropriate level through the Teflon strip and the strip is parachuted outside the aortic root base, passing under the coronary ostia. The two ends of the Teflon strip are tied at the level of the non-coronary sinus. Aortic annuloplasty is a crucial step to improve valve competence and stabilization. While several techniques offer good mid- to long-term results, annuloplasty with an external Teflon ring appears to be a simple and effective alternative to guarantee stable root diameters. Longer follow-up studies are needed to confirm the mid- to long-term results.
RESUMO
The aim of the study was to evaluate the medium-term results of aortic valve neocuspidalization according to Ozaki compared to Ross procedure for treatment of isolated aortic valve disease in pediatric age. Thirty-eight consecutive patients with congenital or acquired aortic valve disease underwent either Ozaki (n = 22) or Ross (n = 16) operation between 01/2015 and 05/2020. The primary outcome was progression of aortic valve disease and aortic ring and root dimension, whereas secondary outcome was freedom from reintervention or death by type of operation. Median age was 12.4 (8.8-15.8) years and the prevailing lesion was stenosis in 20 cases (52%) and incompetence in 18 (48%). One death occurred in the Ross group in the early postoperative period, while there were no deaths in the Ozaki group. Effective treatment of aortic valve stenosis or regurgitation occurred in both groups and remained stable over a median follow-up of 18.2 (5-32) months. In Ozaki group, 3 patients required aortic valve replacement at 4.9, 3.5, and 33 months, respectively. In Ross group, 1 patient required Melody pulmonary valve replacement, whereas none required aortic valve surgery. Finally, significantly higher aortic transvalvular gradient at follow-up was recorded in Ozaki group compared to Ross group. Overall, there was no significant difference in freedom from reoperation or death between the two groups. The medium-term outcome of Ozaki and Ross in pediatric patients is similar, despite an increased tendency of the former to develop aortic transvalvular gradient in the follow-up. Future larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these results.
