The road less traveled: Developing pharmacist clinician-scientists through divergent training pathways.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Professional organizations have emphasized the growing need for pharmacists to possess advanced research skills; however, there is a scarcity of training programs aimed at nurturing clinician-scientists. This report outlines 3 critical care-focused research programs, each offering a unique approach to training clinician-scientists. SUMMARY: Limited resources and formalized programs are available to bridge the gap between the demand for and availability of skilled clinician-scientists. Several programs have stepped forward to share their experiences in establishing and executing training initiatives aimed at cultivating skilled clinician-scientists in the critical care practice space. CONCLUSION: Enhancing the development of clinician-scientists for clinical and translational research is necessary in the critical care clinical pharmacy community.

Evaluation of Critical Care Pharmacist Evening Services at an Academic Medical Center.

Purpose: Critical care pharmacists are considered essential members of the healthcare team; however, justification and recruitment of new positions, especially in the evening or weekend shifts, remains a significant challenge. The purpose of this study was to investigate the number of interventions, type of interventions, and associated cost savings with the addition of 1 board certified critical care clinical pharmacist to evening shift. Methods: This was a prospective collection and characterization of 1 evening shift critical care pharmacist's clinical interventions over a 12-week period. Interventions were collected and categorized daily from 13:00 to 22:00 Monday through Friday. After collection was complete, cost savings estimates were calculated using pharmacy wholesaler acquisition cost. Results: Interventions were collected on 52 of 60 weekdays. A total of 510 interventions were collected with an average of 9.8 interventions accepted per day. The most common interventions included transitions of care, medication dose adjustment, and antibiotic de-escalation and the highest proportion of interventions occurred in the medical intensive care unit. An estimated associated cost avoidance of $66 537.80 was calculated for an average of $1279.57 saved per day. Additionally, 22 (4.1%) of interventions were considered high yield interventions upon independent review by 2 pharmacists. Conclusion: The addition of 1 board-certified critical care pharmacist to evening shift resulted in multiple interventions across several categories and a significant cost avoidance when calculated using conservative measures.

Performance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Polymerase Chain Reaction Nasal Screening for Ruling Out MRSA Pneumonia in Hospitalized, Immunocompromised Patients.

Background: Recent literature demonstrates support for using methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swab polymerase chain reaction (NaPCR) screening as an antimicrobial stewardship tool aiding early de-escalation of anti-MRSA antimicrobials. However, immunocompromised patients have been underrepresented in previous studies despite increased risk of morbidity and mortality from multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of the MRSA NaPCR in hospitalized, immunocompromised adult patients with suspected pneumonia. Methods: A single-center, retrospective, observational review was conducted of hospitalized, immunocompromised adult patients that had an MRSA NaPCR obtained between March 1, 2020 and January 10, 2021. For inclusion, bacterial cultures must have been collected within 2 weeks after MRSA NaPCR. The primary outcome was the NPV of MRSA NaPCR in hospitalized, immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia. Secondary outcomes include NPV in other infections. Results: Between March 1, 2020 and January 10, 2021, 59 patients with 78 unique cultures, including 28 respiratory cultures, were included in the study. The NPV of the MRSA NaPCR for pneumonia was 91.7%. The NPV for bloodstream infections was 100% and for urinary tract infections was 100%, but interpretation of these results should be cautioned due to the small sample sizes. Conclusion: The NPV of MRSA NaPCR in pneumonia remains high in this study. The MRSA NaPCR has utility as a de-escalation tool in hospitalized, immunocompromised adult patients, but larger studies are warranted to evaluate all immunocompromised patient populations.

An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Medication Regimen Complexity as Measured by the MRC-ICU to Medication Errors in Critically Ill Patients.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between medication regimen complexity-intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score at 24 hours and medication errors identified throughout the ICU. Methods: A single-center, observational study was conducted from August to October 2021. The primary outcome was the association between MRC-ICU at 24 hours and total medication errors identified. During the prospective component, ICU pharmacists recorded medication errors identified over an 8-week period. During the retrospective component, the electronic medical record was reviewed to collect patient demographics, outcomes, and MRC-ICU score at 24 hours. The primary outcome of the relationship of MRC-ICU at 24 hours to medication errors was assessed using Pearson correlation. Results: A total of 150 patients were included. There were 2 pharmacists who recorded 634 errors during the 8-week study period. No significant relationship between MRC-ICU and medication errors was observed (r2 = .13, P = .11). Exploratory analyses of MRC-ICU relationship to major interventions and harm scores showed that MRC-ICU scores >10 had more major interventions (27 vs 14, P = .27) and higher harm scores (15 vs 7, P = .33), although these values were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Medication errors appear to occur independently of medication regimen complexity. Critical care pharmacists were responsible for mitigating a large number of medication errors.

Medication regimen complexity (MRC-ICU) for in-hospital mortality prediction in COVID-19 patients.

Purpose: The medication regimen complexity-intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score was developed prior to the existence of COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to assess if MRC-ICU could predict in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19. Methods: A single-center, observational study was conducted from August 2020 to January 2021. The primary outcome of this study was the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) for in-hospital mortality for the 48-hour MRC-ICU. Age, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and World Health Organization (WHO) COVID-19 Severity Classification were assessed. Logistic regression was performed to predict in-hospital mortality as well as WHO Severity Classification at 7 days. Results: A total of 149 patients were included. The median SOFA score was 8 (IQR 5-11) and median MRC-ICU score at 48 hours was 15 (IQR 7-21). The in-hospital mortality rate was 36% (n = 54). The AUROC for MRC-ICU was 0.71 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.62-0.78) compared to 0.66 for age, 0.81 SOFA, and 0.72 for the WHO Severity Classification. In univariate analysis, age, SOFA, MRC-ICU, and WHO Severity Classification all demonstrated significant association with in-hospital mortality, while SOFA, MRC-ICU, and WHO Severity Classification demonstrated significant association with WHO Severity Classification at 7 days. In univariate analysis, all 4 characteristics showed significant association with mortality; however, only age and SOFA remained significant following multivariate analysis. Conclusion: In the first analysis of medication-related variables as a predictor of severity and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19, MRC-ICU demonstrated acceptable predictive ability as represented by AUROC; however, SOFA was the strongest predictor in both AUROC and regression analysis.

Implementation of a unique mass casualty and emergency preparedness longitudinal learning experience for postgraduate year 2 pharmacy residents.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) critical care pharmacy residency program offers an elective competency area, E3: Mass Casualty. Similar elective competencies are also available for PGY2 emergency medicine and postgraduate year 1/2 pharmacotherapy programs. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, pharmacist proficiency in the management of disasters is even more urgent. However, few residency programs require or include a specific learning experience to achieve this competency. This article provides examples of opportunities that residency programs can implement to offer an Emergency Preparedness/Mass Casualty (EP/MC) learning experience. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: A longitudinal EP/MC learning experience was integrated into a PGY2 critical care program. FINDINGS: A longitudinal EP/MC learning experience within the PGY2 critical care, emergency medicine, and pharmacotherapy residency program curricula is achievable and promotes resident development. Learning experience components included topic discussions, participation on local and state-level emergency preparedness (EP) committees, completion of certification programs, projects, and participation on statewide emergency response teams. SUMMARY: Implementation of a longitudinal EP/MC learning experience formalizes topics and activities that support achievement of the ASHP elective competency area of Mass Casualty for PGY2 residency programs. EP/MC goals and objectives should be a requirement for critical care, emergency medicine, pharmacotherapy, and health-system pharmacy administration and leadership PGY2 programs. By formalizing training, pharmacists can be better prepared for EP and more integrated into multidisciplinary disaster response teams.

Productivity Tracking: A Survey of Critical Care Pharmacist Practices and Satisfaction.

Introduction: The position paper on critical care pharmacy services describes two tiers of responsibilities: essential and desirable activities. Activities are categorized into five domains: patient care, quality improvement, research and scholarship, training and education, and professional development. Documentation of these activities can be important for justifying pharmacist positions, comparing pharmacy practice models, conducting performance evaluations, and tracking individual workload; however, limited recommendations are provided for standardized productivity tracking, and national practices remain largely uncharacterized. Objectives: The purpose of this survey was to describe documentation practices of critical care pharmacist activities. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed via email to 1694 members of the ACCP critical care practice research network. The survey asked respondents to describe the methods used to document productivity as it relates to the 5 domains. Results: Seventy-nine (4.7%) critical care pharmacists from 63 institutions completed the survey. Intervention documentation was used for position justification and annual reviews among 54.4% and 44.1% of pharmacists, respectively. Pharmacists were routinely expected to perform additional responsibilities beyond patient care that contribute to overall productivity, but the percentage of institutions that track these activities as a measure of pharmacist productivity was relatively low: quality improvement (46%), research/scholarship (29%), training/education (38%), and professional development (27%). Documentation of these additional responsibilities and activities was primarily used for annual evaluations, but the majority of respondents answered that no standardized method for tracking activities existed. In multivariate regression, dedicated ICU pharmacists was a significant predictor for increased satisfaction (Exp(ß) 4.498, 95% CI 1.054-19.187, P = .042). Conclusion: Practice variation exists in how and for what intent critical care pharmacists track productivity. Further evaluation and standardization of productivity tracking may aid in position justification and practice model evaluation for dedicated ICU pharmacists in today's value-based era.

Vasopressor Discontinuation Order in Septic Shock With Reduced Left Ventricular Function.

BACKGROUND: The optimal vasopressor management for septic patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction has not been well established, and current evidence is conflicting regarding the optimal vasopressor discontinuation order. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the impact of LV dysfunction on the hemodynamic management of septic shock by assessing the incidence of clinically significant hypotension after vasopressor discontinuation. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, adult patients were included if they met the Sepsis-3 definition of septic shock, had LV dysfunction (defined as an ejection fraction ≤40%), and received norepinephrine and vasopressin as the last vasopressors discontinued. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant hypotension following discontinuation of vasopressin or norepinephrine. Clinically significant hypotension was defined as a MAP less than 60 mmHg and the need for either: 1) the reinstitution of the previously discontinued agent at any dosage, 2) the receipt of at least 500 mL of a crystalloid at a rate of at least 500 mL/hour, 3) or the receipt of at least 25 grams of albumin 5% at a rate of at least 25 gram/hour. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, and ICU and hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients met inclusion criteria, with 37 patients having vasopressin discontinued first and 41 having norepinephrine discontinued first. Clinically significant hypotension occurred in 28 patients (76%) following the discontinuation of vasopressin, compared to 28 patients (81%) following the discontinuation of norepinephrine (p = 0.61). ICU length of stay was 9 days in the vasopressin discontinued first cohort, compared to 15 days in the norepinephrine discontinued first cohort (p = 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality observed. CONCLUSION: The discontinuation order of norepinephrine and vasopressin did not impact the incidence of clinically significant hypotension in patients with septic shock and LV dysfunction, but may influence ICU length of stay, although other factors may have impacted this finding.

Assessment of Electrolyte Replacement in Critically Ill Patients During a Drug Shortage.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine if national drug shortages of electrolyte replacement products negatively impact patient care. Methods: This study was a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort of adults admitted to the medical, surgical, or trauma intensive care unit (ICU) that were ordered or would have qualified for the general or continuous renal replacement therapy electrolyte replacement protocol (ERP) between April 2017 and August 2018. In October 2017, ERP use was suspended and enteral replacement was promoted due to inability to maintain consistent inventory of intravenous replacement products. The primary objective was to compare the percentage of patient days that at least 1 critically low value of potassium, magnesium, and/or phosphorus existed between protocolized and nonprotocolized electrolyte replacement. Secondary objectives included characterizing the ratio of enteral replacement to duration of critically low electrolyte values during protocolized and nonprotocolized electrolyte replacement. Results: A total of 288 patients were included. The mean percentage of ICU days with low electrolyte levels in the protocolized period was significantly higher than in the nonprotocolized period (21.4% vs 17.5%, P = .0238). There was a negative relationship between the total electrolyte replacement that was given enterally and the percentage of patient days with critically low values indicating that as enteral replacement increased, percentage of days with low values decreased. The association between percentage of enteral replacement and days with critically low electrolyte values was significantly lower in the protocolized period. Conclusion: Intravenous electrolyte replacement product shortages did not result in an increased incidence of critically low electrolyte values. Enteral replacement was associated with a decreased incidence of low electrolyte values.

Time to blood, respiratory and urine culture positivity in the intensive care unit: Implications for de-escalation.

OBJECTIVES: Concern for late detection of bacterial pathogens is a barrier to early de-escalation efforts. The purpose of this study was to assess blood, respiratory and urine culture results at 72 h to test the hypothesis that early negative culture results have a clinically meaningful negative predictive value. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit between March 2012 and July 2018 with blood cultures obtained. Blood, respiratory and urine culture results were assessed for time to positivity, defined as the time between culture collection and preliminary species identification. The primary outcome was the negative predictive value of negative blood culture results at 72 h. Secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of blood, respiratory and urine culture results. RESULTS: The analysis included 1567 blood, 514 respiratory and 1059 urine cultures. Of the blood, respiratory and urine cultures ultimately positive, 90.3%, 76.2% and 90.4% were positive at 72 h. The negative predictive value of negative 72-h blood, respiratory and urine cultures were 0.99, 0.82 and 0.97, respectively. Antibiotic de-escalation had good specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for finalized negative cultures. CONCLUSION: Negative blood and urine culture results at 72 h had a high negative predictive value. These findings have important ramifications for antimicrobial stewardship efforts and support protocolized re-evaluation of empiric antibiotic therapy at 72 h. Caution should be used in patients with clinically suspected pneumonia, since negative respiratory culture results at 72 h were weakly predictive of finalized negative cultures.

Hydrocortisone Continuous Infusion Versus Bolus Dose on Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid therapy in patients with septic shock can improve hemodynamics but can also cause hyperglycemia. Continuous infusion (CI) hydrocortisone has limited evidence that it may reduce hyperglycemia relative to bolus dose (BD) therapy, but CI can be cumbersome and requires attention to intravenous access and drug incompatibilities. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of CI hydrocortisone with BD on glycemic control. METHODS: A matched, retrospective cohort study of blood glucose, insulin requirements, and glycemic variability was performed between patients with shock receiving CI and BD hydrocortisone. Patients were matched based on history of type 2 diabetes and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: Baseline blood glucose was similar between groups, with higher baseline hourly insulin requirements in the CI group (CI: 12 [12.8] units, BD: 6.7 [7] units, P = .0012). For the first 72 hours of treatment, there was no difference in mean blood glucose with higher average hourly insulin requirements in the CI group (CI 7.8 [7.7] units, BD: 5.5 [6.9] units, P < .0001). There was no difference in glycemic variability between groups. CONCLUSIONS: CI hydrocortisone therapy for septic shock does not appear to have a favorable impact on mean blood glucose or influence glycemic variability relative to BD therapy.

Minocycline repurposing in critical illness: focus on stroke.

Stroke is a devastating disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite the approved indication of systemic thrombolytic therapy in the United States for the acute management of ischemic stroke, its use is limited given a strict eligibility criteria and a risk for hemorrhagic transformation as a feared adverse effect. Many agents have been studied without success for neuroprotection in patients with stroke to reduce vascular injury and improve long-term functional outcomes. Minocycline is a tetracycline antibiotic that shows promise for its neuroprotective effects in multiple animal models and three human trials. It affects multiple pathways to reduce apoptosis, neuroinflammation, infarct size, and vascular injury. The aim of this review is to discuss current evidence for minocycline from pre-clinical and early clinical trials and its potential role in neuroprotection in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Examination of the relationship between antimicrobials and thrombocytosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether there is a relationship between antimicrobial therapy and the development of thrombocytosis. DATA SOURCES: Literature was accessed through EMBASE (1977-June 2012) and MEDLINE (1977-June 2012) using the terms thrombocytosis and antimicrobial. In addition, reference citations from publications identified were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language publications identified were evaluated. For case reports, the Naranjo probability scale was used to calculate the likelihood of the drug causing the reaction. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thrombocytosis occurring during antimicrobial therapy is well documented, with several case reports and clinical trial observations. However, a direct causal relationship is not yet supported by the available literature. Platelets are well known to be an acute phase reactant, with an elevated count occurring after acute conditions such as blood loss, inflammation, or infection. Thrombocytosis during antimicrobial therapy may be the result of an infectious process and not an adverse drug event. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current available literature, a definitive link cannot be established between antimicrobial therapy and occurrence of thrombocytosis.