Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Better Restores Knee Stability and Reduces Failure Rates Than Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients.

BACKGROUND: The increase in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in pediatric patients and the high failure rate reported in the literature in this population are driving surgeons to search for specific techniques to better restore knee stability. Recent literature has reported that the combination of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and ACL reconstruction improves outcomes in high-risk patients. However, such advantages in pediatric patients have been infrequently evaluated. PURPOSE: To assess whether adding LET to ACL reconstruction can significantly improve knee stability, clinical outcomes, and failure rates in pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A multicentric study involving 3 orthopaedic teaching centers was conducted to evaluate pediatric patients aged between 12 and 16 years who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction using a physeal-sparing femoral tunnel drilling technique. A minimum 2-year follow-up evaluation was required. Based on the surgical technique performed, the patients were divided into 2 group. The patients in group 1 underwent an isolated arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, while the patients in group 2 had an arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in combination with a modified Lemaire LET procedure. Group 1 was a historical control cohort of patients, whereas group 2 was prospectively enrolled. All the patients included in the present study were clinically evaluated using the Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC) subjective score and the Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (Pedi-FABS) score. Anteroposterior knee stability was measured using the KT-1000 knee ligament arthrometer, and the objective pivot-shift evaluation was documented using a triaxial accelerometer (Kinematic Rapid Assessment [KiRA]). The included patients also underwent a standardized radiological protocol to evaluate leg-length discrepancies, axial deviation, and degenerative signs preoperatively and at last follow-up. RESULTS: This study included 66 pediatric patients with an anatomic hybrid ACL reconstruction using an autologous 4-strand hamstring graft. In group 1, there were 34 patients (mean age, 13.5 ± 1.2 years), while 32 patients (mean age, 13.8 ± 1.4 years) were included in group 2. The clinical outcome scores showed no difference between the 2 groups (Pedi-IKDC, P = .072; Pedi-FABS, P = .180). Nevertheless, the patients in group 2 had better anteroposterior stability measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer (1.9 ± 1.1 mm in group 1 vs 0.8 ± 0.8 mm in group 2; P = .031), as well as better rotational stability measured using the KiRA (-0.59 ± 1.05 m/s2 in group 2 vs 0.98 ± 1.12 m/s2 in group 1; P = .012). The patients in group 1 returned to sports at the same competitive level at a rate of 82.4%, while patients included in group 2 returned at the same competitive level in 90.6% of the cases without a significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .059). No leg-length discrepancies were found between the 2 groups at last follow-up (P = .881). Two patients displayed an increased valgus deformity of 3° on the operated limb at last follow-up (1 patient in group 1 and 1 patient in group 2). Group 1 had a significatively higher cumulative failure rate (14.7% vs 6.3%; P = .021). No intra- or postoperative complications was observed between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Performing a modified Lemaire LET along with an ACL reconstruction with hamstring graft in pediatric patients reduced the cumulative failure rate and improved objective stability with no increase in intra- or postoperative complications. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of patient-reported outcomes or in the return-to-sports activity.

Lateral extraarticular tenodesis improves stability in non-anatomic ACL reconstructed knees: in vivo kinematic analysis.

PURPOSE: To carry out an in vivo kinematic analysis to determine whether adding a lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) for those patients with subjective instability and objective residual laxity after a transtibial (TT) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) reduces anteroposterior and rotational laxity and to evaluate the 2-year follow-up clinical outcomes to analyze whether biomechanical changes determine clinical improvement or not. METHODS: A total of 19 patients with residual knee instability after TT ACLR who underwent a modified Lemaire LET were prospectively evaluated for at least 2-year follow-up. Preoperative, intraoperative, and 6 and 24-month postoperative kinematic analyses were carried out using the KiRA accelerometer and KT1000 arthrometer to look for residual anterolateral rotational instability and residual anteroposterior instability. Functional outcomes were measured with the single-leg vertical jump test and the single-leg hop test. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the IKDC 2000, Lysholm, and Tegner scores. RESULTS: A significant reduction in anterolateral rotational instability was detected with the patient under anesthesia (from 3 ± 1.2 to 1.1 ± 1.1 m/s2; p < 0.05) as well as with the patient awake (from 2.1 ± 0.8 to 0.7 ± 1.4 m/s2; p < 0.05). A significant reduction in anteroposterior instability was only present under anesthesia (from 3.4 ± 1.9 to 2.1 ± 1.1 mm; p < 0.05), while no difference was present without anesthesia (from 2.3 ± 1.1 to 1.6 ± 1 mm; n.s.). Postoperative analysis of knee laxity did not show any significant variation from the first to the last follow-up. Both the single-leg vertical jump test and single-leg hop test improved significantly at the last follow-up (both p < 0.05). The mean values of both the IKDC and Tegner scores showed an improvement (p < 0.05 and p < 0.05, respectively), whereas that was not the case with the Lysholm score (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: The modified Lemaire LET can improve the kinematics of a non-anatomic ACL reconstructed knee with residual subjective and objective instability. These kinematic changes were able to lead to an improvement in subjective stability as well as the function of the knee in a small cohort of recreationally active patients. At 2-year follow-up, the kinematic changes as well as the level of activity of the patients and the IKDC score show their improvement sustained. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Effect of Modified Lemaire Anterolateral Extra-articular Tenodesis on the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Maturity Signal of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Hamstring Graft.

BACKGROUND: Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is one of the most widely used procedures to restore anterolateral stability. Clinical outcomes after the addition of LET to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) have been widely investigated; however, the potential influence of LET on the ACL ligamentization process has not been examined. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to use 10-month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to determine whether the maturity of grafts after hamstring autograft ACLR was affected by concomitant LET. The hypothesis was that when modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (MLLET) was performed, the MRI parameters of ACL graft maturity would be modified. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The study included patients treated between December 2017 and December 2018 who had undergone anatomic 3-strand hamstring tendon autograft ACLR, with or without concomitant MLLET, and had undergone MRI 10 months postoperatively. Thus, the study included 30 patients who had isolated ACLR and 22 patients who had ACLR plus MLLET. The 2 groups were comparable based on all criteria analyzed. To evaluate graft maturity, the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) was measured in 3 regions of interest of the proximal, midsubstance, and distal ACL graft. Lower SNQ ratios indicate less water content and, theoretically, better maturity and healing of the graft. RESULTS: The mean ± SD for SNQ was 4.62 ± 4.29 (range, 3.12-6.19) in the isolated ACLR group and 7.59 ± 4.68 (range, 4.38-8.04) in the ACLR plus MLLET group (P = .012). Upon comparing the mean values of the 3 portions between the 2 groups, we found a significant difference between the 2 groups for the proximal and middle portions (P = .007 and P = .049, respectively) but no difference in the distal portion (P = .369). CONCLUSION: At the 10-month follow-up, hamstring tendon autografts for anatomic ACLR with MLLET did not show the same MRI signal intensity compared with isolated hamstring anatomic ACLR.

The Role of the Posterolateral Tibial Slope in the Rotational Instability of the Knee in Patients Affected by a Complete Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Its Value in the Decision-Making Process during the Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction.

Purpose The aim of this retrospective, multicenter study was to investigate the correlation between a high degree of rotatory instability, posterolateral tibial slope (PLTS), and anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury. Methods The study population consisted of 76 adults with isolated, complete noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. The sample was divided into two groups according to the preoperative degree of rotator instability (group A: pivot-shift test grades 2 and 3; group B: pivot-shift test grade 1). Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment included angle of PLTS, posterior shift of the lateral femoral condyle (16 mm) on the tibial plateau, and the presence/absence of ALL injury. The two groups were compared for differences. Results There was a statistically significant association between pivot-shift test grades 2 and 3 (group A), PLTS slope angle > 9 degrees, and ALL injury ( p < 0.05). Group A also demonstrated a greater posterior shift of lateral femoral condyle (>11 mm), which was, however, not statistically significant when evaluated as an isolated variable. Conclusion Our study indicates that an increased PLTS is associated with an increased incidence of ALL injury and an increased grade of pivot shift in patients with ACL tear. Assessment of posterolateral tibial slope on MRI can therefore play a key adjunct role in the surgical planning of ALL reconstruction, especially in cases when ALL damage is radiologically difficult to detect or doubtful. Level of Evidence This is a retrospective comparative level III study.

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to propose a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for the acetabular periprosthetic fractures. METHODS: This article explores the current literature on the epidemiology, causes and classification of periprosthetic acetabular fractures. Integrating data with the experience of the authors, it offers a guide to diagnosis and possible therapeutic strategies. RESULTS: Intra-operative fractures can occur during rasping, reaming or implant impaction, and they must be treated immediately if the component(s) is (are) unstable. Post-operative fractures can be due to major trauma (acute fractures) or minor forces in bone osteolysis; it is possible to plan reconstruction and fixation according to fracture characteristics. Treatment choice depends upon fracture site and implant stability. CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are uncommon complications that can occur intra-operatively or post-operatively, and a reconstructive surgeon must be able to manage the procedure. Accurate planning and reconstruction implant are necessary to achieve good cup stability.