Pharmacokinetics and safety of olodaterol administered with the Respimat Soft Mist inhaler in subjects with impaired hepatic or renal function.

PURPOSE: In two trials, the influences of hepatic and renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of olodaterol, a novel long-acting inhaled ß2-agonist for treatment of COPD, were investigated. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The first trial included eight subjects with mild hepatic function impairment (Child-Pugh A), eight subjects with moderate impairment (Child-Pugh B), and 16 matched healthy subjects with normal hepatic function. The second trial included eight subjects with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL·min(-1)) and 14 matched healthy subjects with normal renal function. Subjects received single doses of 20 or 30 µg olodaterol administered with the Respimat Soft Mist inhaler. RESULTS: Olodaterol was well tolerated in all subjects. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 4 hours (AUC0-4) for subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment compared to healthy subjects were 97% (75%-125%) and 105% (79%-140%), respectively. Corresponding values for dose-normalized maximum concentration (C max) were 112% (84%-151%) (mild impairment) and 99% (73%-135%) (moderate impairment). The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of AUC0-4 for subjects with severe renal impairment compared to healthy subjects was 135% (94%-195%), and for C max was 137% (84%-222%). There was no significant relationship between creatinine clearance and AUC0-4 or C max. Renal clearance of olodaterol was reduced to 20% of normal in severe renal impairment. CONCLUSION: Mild to moderate hepatic function impairment or severe renal function impairment did not result in a clinically relevant increase of olodaterol systemic exposure after a single inhaled dose.

Investigating pulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics of inhaled olodaterol in healthy volunteers using a population pharmacokinetic approach.

AIMS: Olodaterol, a novel ß2-adrenergic receptor agonist, is a long-acting, once-daily inhaled bronchodilator approved for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The aim of the present study was to describe the plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of olodaterol after intravenous administration and oral inhalation in healthy volunteers by population pharmacokinetic modelling and thereby to infer its pulmonary fate. METHODS: Plasma and urine data after intravenous administration (0.5-25 µg) and oral inhalation (2.5-70 µg via the Respimat® inhaler) were available from a total of 148 healthy volunteers (single and multiple dosing). A stepwise model building approach was applied, using population pharmacokinetic modelling. Systemic disposition parameters were fixed to estimates obtained from intravenous data when modelling data after inhalation. RESULTS: A pharmacokinetic model, including three depot compartments with associated parallel first-order absorption processes (pulmonary model) on top of a four-compartment body model (systemic disposition model), was found to describe the data the best. The dose reaching the lung (pulmonary bioavailable fraction) was estimated to be 49.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46.1, 52.7%] of the dose released from the device. A large proportion of the pulmonary bioavailable fraction [70.1% (95% CI 66.8, 73.3%)] was absorbed with a half-life of 21.8 h (95% CI 19.7, 24.4 h). CONCLUSIONS: The plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of olodaterol after intravenous administration and oral inhalation in healthy volunteers were adequately described. The key finding was that a high proportion of the pulmonary bioavailable fraction had an extended pulmonary residence time. This finding was not expected based on the physicochemical properties of olodaterol.

Pharmacometric characterization of dabigatran hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis has been shown to be a useful method of decreasing dabigatran plasma levels in situations that require rapid elimination of this thrombin inhibitor. However, there is currently no clinical recommendation for the accelerated/optimized elimination of dabigatran via hemodialysis (e.g., flow rates, filter type, duration of dialysis). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the present work was to characterize, via pharmacometric methods, the effects of different blood flow rates in hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of dabigatran, using data from a dedicated phase I dialysis study of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. In addition, the effects of various clinically relevant hemodialysis settings were evaluated by simulation to assess their potential use in non-ESRD situations. METHODS: Seven patients with ESRD were investigated in an open-label, fixed-sequence, two-period comparison trial. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to fit the data and then used for various simulations. Data analyses were performed using NONMEM(®), Berkeley Madonna, or SAS. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of dabigatran were best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and a lag time. In addition to total body clearance in ESRD subjects, a first-order dialysis clearance was implemented which was greater than zero during hemodialysis and zero during the interdialytic periods. The relationship between the dialysis clearance and the blood flow rate was best described by the Michaels function. Simulations showed that varying clinically relevant dialysis settings such as filter properties or flow rates had only minor effects. Dialysis duration had the strongest impact on dabigatran plasma concentration. The observed geometric mean redistribution effect after hemodialysis was low (<16 %). The final model was successfully evaluated through the prediction of plasma concentrations from a case report undergoing dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis allowed the influences of various hemodialysis parameters on the dabigatran plasma concentration to be predicted in detail for the first time. Dialysis duration was identified as having the strongest impact on the reduction in dabigatran plasma concentration. The model developed here can potentially serve as a tool to provide guidance when considering the use of hemodialysis in patients who have received dabigatran.

Effective elimination of dabigatran by haemodialysis. A phase I single-centre study in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Dabigatran, a specific, reversible direct thrombin inhibitor, is used to prevent ischaemic and haemorrhagic strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation. As with every anticoagulant, there is a need to rapidly reverse its effects in emergency situations. In an open-label, single-centre phase I study with two fixed multiple dosing periods, we investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of dabigatran before, during and after 4 hour haemodialysis sessions with either 200 or 400 ml/min targeted blood flow in seven end-stage renal disease patients without atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran was administered over three days in a regimen designed to achieve peak plasma concentrations comparable to those observed in atrial fibrillation patients receiving 150 mg b.i.d. and to attain adequate distribution of dabigatran in the central and peripheral compartments. Plasma concentration-time profiles were similar in both periods on Day 3 (Cmax: 176 and 159 ng/ml). Four hours of haemodialysis removed 48.8% and 59.3% of total dabigatran from the central compartment with 200 and 400 ml/minute targeted blood flow, respectively. The anticoagulant activity of dabigatran was linearly related to its plasma levels. There was a minor redistribution of dabigatran (<16%) after the end of the haemodialysis session. In conclusion, a 4 hour haemodialysis session can rapidly eliminate a substantial amount of dabigatran from the central compartment with a concomitant marked reduction in its anticoagulant activity. There was a clinically negligible redistribution of dabigatran after haemodialysis. These results demonstrate that haemodialysis can be a suitable approach to eliminate dabigatran in emergency situations.

Analysis of upper gastrointestinal adverse events among patients given dabigatran in the RE-LY trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dabigatran is an oral and direct inhibitor of thrombin. In a study of patients with atrial fibrillation (the RE-LY trial), twice as many subjects given dabigatran reported dyspepsia-like symptoms compared with those given warfarin (controls). We analyzed data from this trial to quantify upper gastrointestinal nonbleeding adverse events (NB-UGI AEs). METHODS: We analyzed the AE database from the RE-LY trial (18,113 subjects) and assigned NB-UGI AEs to 4 groups: those associated with gastroesophageal reflux (GERD), upper abdominal pain and dyspepsia, dysmotility, or gastroduodenal injury. We analyzed frequency, timing, and severity, and clinical variables associated with NB-UGI AEs. RESULTS: NB-UGI AEs occurred in 16.9% of subjects given dabigatran and in 9.4% of controls (relative risk [RR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66%-1.97%; P < .001). Rates of AEs were not associated with the dose of dabigatran. Among subjects with any UGI symptom who were given dabigatran (n = 2045), symptoms were rated as mild in 46.3%, moderate in 44.8%, and severe in 8.9%; these values were similar to those of controls. GERD-associated NB-UGI AEs were most frequent among the 4 groups (compared with controls, RR, 3.71; 95% CI, 2.98%-4.62%; P < .001). Four percent of subjects stopped taking dabigatran because of NB-UGI AEs (most within 3 months of starting therapy), compared with 1.7% of controls (RR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.90%-2.88%; P < .001). NB-UGI AEs slightly increased risk of major GI bleeding among subjects given dabigatran and controls (6.8% vs 2.3%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients given dabigatran for atrial fibrillation, NB-UGI AEs are generally mild or moderate; 4% stopped taking the drug over a median of 21.7 months. The greatest increase was in GERD-type NB-UGI AEs. These observations should guide management and prevention strategies.