"Everything has changed since COVID": Ongoing challenges faced by Canadian adults with intellectual disabilities during waves 2 and 3 of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the lives of people with intellectual disabilities in many ways, impacting their health and wellbeing. Early in the pandemic, the research team delivered a six-week virtual group-based program to help Canadian adults with intellectual disabilities cope and better manage their mental health. The study's objective was to explore ongoing concerns among individuals with intellectual disabilities following their participation in this education and support program. Thematic analysis was used to analyze participant feedback provided eight weeks after course completion. Twenty-four participants were interviewed in January 2021 and May 2021 across two cycles of the course. Three themes emerged: 1) employment and financial challenges; 2) navigating changes and ongoing restrictions; and 3) vaccine anticipation and experience. These findings suggest that despite benefiting from the program, participants continued to experience pandemic-related challenges in 2021, emphasising the need to continually engage people with intellectual disabilities.

Using a Quality Improvement Approach to Implement Measurement-Based Care (MBC) in Outpatient General Psychiatry.

BACKGROUND: Measurement-based care (MBC) is the clinical practice of using patient-reported symptom measurement to inform treatment decisions. MBC has been shown to improve patient outcomes and quality of care in outpatient psychiatry. Despite these benefits, MBC is not routinely used in most psychiatric outpatient settings. This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to achieve 75% completion of symptom scales using an online MBC platform in a general psychiatry clinic in Toronto, Canada, by June 2022. METHODS: The QI team used the Model for Improvement methodology. The main outcome measure was completion of symptom scales using an online MBC platform. Process measures included counts of invitations to join the MBC platform, counts of online MBC account creation, and counts of symptom scale assignment by clinicians. Balancing measures included administrative task completion and physician workload assessment. Stakeholder interviews explored barriers and facilitators to MBC utilization. RESULTS: Completion of symptom scales increased from 7/65 (10.8%) preintervention to 40/70 (57.1%) during the 26-week intervention. Clinician reminders and coaching clinicians about how to incorporate MBC into the care process facilitated uptake of MBC. Stakeholders identified several barriers to implementation, particularly physician attitudes toward MBC and perceived administrative burden. CONCLUSION: Completion of symptom scales increased over the course of this QI initiative. Successful implementation of MBC in general psychiatry outpatient settings requires the availability of a broad range of measurement scales given the diversity of mental health diagnoses. Implementation must also consider health equity, including access to technology and availability of symptom scales in multiple languages.

'More together than apart': The evaluation of a virtual course to improve mental health and well-being of adults with intellectual disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: To address the growing concerns over poor mental health experienced by adults with intellectual disabilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a national virtual mental health course was delivered and evaluated. METHODS: This mixed methods study utilized both qualitative and quantitative assessments. Participants were 27 adults with intellectual disabilities who participated in the 6-week course. Participants completed measures of self-efficacy and well-being at three time points and qualitative satisfaction measures at post and follow-up. RESULTS: Attendance was high and the course was feasible and acceptable to participants. Positive changes related to mental health self-efficacy were detected (p = .01), though mental well-being did not improve. CONCLUSION: The study provided evidence for the feasibility and value of the course for this population. Future research should examine how virtual courses could support the population in terms of pandemic recovery and how courses may work for individuals who are less independent.