"We're back in control of the story and we're not letting anyone take that away from us": patient teacher programs as means for patient emancipation.

While patient engagement in healthcare professions education (HPE) has significantly increased in the past decades, a theoretical gap remains. What are the varied reasons as to why patients get involved with HPE programs? With a focus on understanding what drives patient involvement with HPE programs, this study examined how a patient as teacher (PAT) program was experienced by medical students, patient teachers, and faculty within a medical school. Through a phenomenographic approach, this study captures and describes the different ways our study participants experienced a PAT program (the 'phenomenon'). 24 semi-structured interviews were conducted in total, comprised of interviews with patient teachers (N = 10), medical students (N = 10) and program facilitators (N = 4) who participated in a PAT program. Our focus was on participants' description of the program and was grounded in their experiences of as well as their beliefs about it. Our findings captured 4 layers representing the qualitatively different (yet interrelated) ways in which participants experienced/perceived and conceptualized the various aspects of their experience with the PAT program: (1) A productive disruption of the learning space (2) A re-humanization within healthcare (3) A means of empowerment and agency (4) A catalyst for change and emancipation. Our outcome space results can be visually illustrated by a nesting "Matryoshka" doll, representing the four layers and depicting the process of uncovering the less conscious layers of sense-making within this phenomenon. HPE programs that are co-produced with patients and actively involve patients as teachers have the potential, but not guarantee, to be emancipatory. To engage in PAT programs that exhibit an emancipatory potential, we need to consider transformative paradigms of education, which are aligned with social change, and disrupt the traditional teacher-learner hierarchy.

Minimally invasive fetal therapy for hydropic lung masses: three different approaches and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To report three different antenatal therapeutic approaches for fetal lung masses associated with hydrops. METHODS: Three prospectively followed cases are described, and all 30 previously published minimally invasive cases of fetal therapy for hydropic lung masses are reviewed. RESULTS: Three hydropic fetuses with large intrathoracic lung masses presented at 17, 25 and 21 weeks of gestation, respectively. An aortic feeding vessel was identified in each case and thus a bronchopulmonary sequestration (BPS) was suspected. Under ultrasound guidance, the feeding vessel was successfully occluded with interstitial laser (Case 1), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (Case 2) and thrombogenic coil embolization (Case 3). Complete (Cases 1 and 2) or partial (Case 3) resolution of the lung mass and hydrops was observed. A healthy infant was born at term after laser therapy (Case 1), and the involved lung lobe was resected on day 2 of postnatal life. In Case 2, hydrops resolved completely following RFA, but an iatrogenic congenital diaphragmatic hernia and abdominal wall defect became apparent 4 weeks later. The neonate died from sepsis following spontaneous preterm labor at 33 weeks. In Case 3, despite technical success in complete vascular occlusion with coils, a stillbirth ensued 2 days after embolization. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of large microcystic or echogenic fetal chest masses associated with hydrops is dismal. This has prompted attempts at treatment by open fetal surgery, with mixed results, high risk of premature labor and consequences for future pregnancies. We have demonstrated the possibility of improved outcome following ultrasound-guided laser ablation of the systemic arterial supply. Despite technical success, RFA and coil embolization led to procedure-related complications and need further evaluation.

Chlamydia trachomatis, tubal disease and the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic infection following hysterosalpingography.

The risk of causing or reactivating pelvic infection by hysterosalpingography (HSG) was assessed in 118 infertile women. Serological evidence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection was sought before, and 10 days and 4 weeks after HSG, using the single-antigen whole-inclusion immunofluorescence (WIF) test for species-specific antibody and the complement fixation test (CFT) for group antibody. Chlamydia antigen was detected using an ELISA. There was a close correlation between the finding of occlusive tubal damage and serum antibodies to C.trachomatis detected by both tests (P less than 0.001). Of 60 patients with WIF antibody titres greater than or equal to 1/64, 65% had evident tubal damage compared with only 16% of patients without a raised titre. Clinically suspected sepsis after HSG occurred in 4% of cases both with and without antibodies to C.trachomatis but only in those with tubal damage (10%). There was no serological evidence of C.trachomatis involvement in symptomatic or asymptomatic patients and anaerobic pathogens were isolated more commonly than C.trachomatis in those symptomatic cases. Isolation of C.trachomatis in two cases from the endocervix and also from the endometrium in one of these only after HSG was compatible with reactivation but not reinfection. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was isolated in two out of three cases with unsuspected tubal disease without antibodies to C.trachomatis. The risk of infection from HSG appears to be confined to patients with existing tubal damage, and in those unexpected cases without serological evidence of previous chlamydial infection, tuberculosis seems to be a likely cause.