Maintained survival outcome after reducing lymphadenectomy rates and optimizing adjuvant treatment in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Main controversies in endometrial cancer treatment include the role of lymphadenectomy and optimal adjuvant treatment. We assessed clinical outcome in a population-based endometrial cancer cohort in relation to changes in treatment management over two decades. METHODS: All consenting endometrial cancer patients receiving primary treatment at Haukeland University Hospital from 2001 to 2019 were included (n = 1308). Clinicopathological variables were evaluated for year-to-year changes. Clinical outcome before and after discontinuing adjuvant radiotherapy and individualizing extent of lymphadenectomy was analyzed. RESULTS: The rate of lymphadenectomy was reduced from 78% in 2001-2012 to 53% in 2013-2019. The rate of patients with verified lymph node metastases was maintained (9% vs 8%, p = 0.58) and FIGO stage I patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy had stable 3-year recurrence-free survival (88% vs 90%, p = 0.67). Adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected FIGO stage III patients increased from 27% to 97% from 2001 to 2009 to 2010-2019, while adjuvant radiotherapy declined from 57% to 0% (p < 0.001). These patients had improved 5-year overall- and recurrence-free survival; 0.49 [95% CI: 0.37-0.65] in 2001-2009 compared to 0.61 [0.45-0.83] in 2010-2019, p = 0.04 and 0.51 [0.39-0.68] to 0.71 [0.60-0.85], p = 0.03, respectively. For stage I, II and IV, survival rates were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that preoperative stratification by imaging and histological assessments permits a reduction in lymphadenectomy to around 50%, and is achievable without an increase in recurrences at 3 years. In addition, our findings support that adjuvant chemotherapy alone performs equally to adjuvant radiotherapy with regard to survival, and is likely superior in advanced stage patients.

Blood steroid levels predict survival in endometrial cancer and reflect tumor estrogen signaling.

OBJECTIVE: Blood-based biomarkers are attractive due to ease of sampling and standardized measurement technology, reducing obstacles to clinical implementation. The objective of this study was to evaluate a clinically available method of steroid hormone measurement for its prognostic potential in endometrial cancer. METHODS: We quantified seven steroid hormones by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in 100 endometrial cancer patients from a prospective cohort. Abdominal fat distribution was assessed from abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. Steroid hormone levels were compared to clinical characteristics, fat distribution and gene expression in primary tumor samples. RESULTS: Low levels of 17OH-progesterone, 11-deoxycortisol and androstenedione were associated with aggressive tumor characteristics and poor disease specific survival (p = .003, p = .001 and p = .02 respectively). Adjusting for preoperative risk based on histological type and grade, low 17OH-progesterone and 11-deoxycortisol independently predicted poor outcome with hazard ratios of 2.69 (p = .033, 95%CI: 1.09-6.68) and 3.40 (p = .020, 1.21-9.51), respectively. Tumors from patients with low steroid level displayed increased expression of genes related to mitosis and cell cycle progression, whereas high steroid level was associated with upregulated estrogen signaling and genes associated with inflammation. Estrone and estradiol correlated to abdominal fat volume in all compartments (total, visceral, subcutaneous, p < .001 for all), but not to the visceral fat proportion. Patients with higher levels of circulating estrogens had increased expression of estrogen signaling related genes. CONCLUSION: Low levels of certain endogenous steroids are associated with aggressive tumor traits and poor survival and may provide preoperative information independent of histological biomarkers already in use.