Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Surg ; 219(5): 776-779, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32172925

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Currently, no evidence compares outcomes for techniques utilizing surgical specimen extractions bags versus unprotected extraction. METHODS: Evaluation of sleeve gastrectomies performed at two high-volume centers. Cases where an extraction bag was used (+EB) were compared to bag-less extraction (-EB). Outcomes included operative contamination, surgical site infections and extraction-site hernias. RESULTS: 674 patients were evaluated (417 in the +EB group and 257 in the -EB group). Preoperative characteristics were similar between groups. There was a trend toward shorter operative times with the -EB group (-EB = 100 min vs + EB = 106 min, p = 0.07). Gross spillage was documented as a contaminated case in 0.4% of -EB cases compared to 1.2% in +EB cases (p = 0.51). Two superficial infections were appreciated (1.2% = +EB vs 0.7% = -EB, p = 0.7) with one post-operative abscess in the -EB group (p = 0.61). One post-operative hernia was seen in each group (p = 0.62). DISCUSSION: Bag-less extraction is a safe, resource conscious method that may potentially decreased operative time.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Manejo de Espécimes/instrumentação , Adulto , Feminino , Gastrectomia/economia , Hérnia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/economia , Masculino , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Manejo de Espécimes/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...