Thoracic surgery in octogenarians: CVTSA/Inova Fairfax hospital experience, 1990 to 2009.

With an increasing proportion of U.S. individuals 80 years of age or older, the authors examined their surgical experience with octogenarians undergoing major, curative-intent thoracic surgery. Between January 1, 1990, and September 1, 2009, 102 octogenarians underwent curative-intent resection for nonsmall cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCCL), esophageal carcinoma (EC), or related surgery for thoracic esophageal perforation (EP). Analysis and reporting followed the guidelines of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database study (1994 to 2003). Eighty-six patients underwent curative-intent resection for NSCCL, 12 for EC, and four for surgery for EP. Hospital and 30-day mortalities were 0 per cent. Overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were: 78, 58, and 32 per cent. Within the NSCCL cohort, minimally invasive exposures (video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] and video thoracoscopy [VT]) were associated with fewer and shorter duration of air leaks, leading to shorter length of stay. Since we began using minimally invasive exposure for NSCCL in 2007, the percentage of octogenarians discharged within 5 days of surgery has increased from 35.5 to 66.7 per cent (P = 0.01), and the percentage of patients discharged within 3 days of surgery has increased from 8.1 to 33.3 per cent (P = 0.006). Of 24 patients undergoing surgery for NSCCL since 2007, 18 (75%) underwent minimally invasive (VATS or VT) exposures, of which 15 patients (83.3%) were discharged home within 5 days and eight (44.4%) within 3 days of their procedure. Excellent, short- and longer-term results can be achieved in elderly patients if risks, exposures, and resections are appropriately matched to patient performance.

Thoracic esophageal perforations.

The authors review their experience with thoracic esophageal perforation at Inova Fairfax Hospital, June 1, 1988, to March 1, 2009. With the exception of 6 patients with occult perforation, all of whom survived with nonoperative therapy, aggressive surgical intervention was the standard approach. Among patients treated aggressively with surgery within 24 hours of perforation, hospital survival was 97 per cent versus 89 per cent for patients treated aggressively surgically after 24 hours. In the absence of phlegmon, implacable obstruction, or delay, primary repair resulted in 100 per cent survival. Where phlegmon or resolute obstruction existed, resection and reconstruction resulted in 96 per cent survival. Even when patients were deemed too ill to undergo surgery, cervical diversion was 100 per cent effective in eradicating continuing leak and achieved 89 per cent survival. Endoesophageal stenting was applied as primary treatment or secondarily such as where leak complicated primary repair. When stenting was used as the initial and primary treatment modality, survival was 88 per cent. Targeted drainage was helpful on occasion as an adjunct to initial therapies. Comfort measures alone were appropriate when clinical circumstances merited no effort at resuscitation. Finally, survivors were asked to self-categorize their ability to swallow; 95 per cent responded good to excellent.