Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Am J Surg ; 218(4): 700-705, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31350009

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A 10-step protocol employing multimodal analgesia was implemented in patients undergoing mastectomy to decrease the quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge. METHODS: Patients who received the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol were compared to a control group. Inpatient and discharge prescription of opioids were compared using oral morphine equivalents (OMEs), along with postoperative pain scores. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2018, fifty-seven patients were eligible for inclusion: 20 patients received ERAS and 37 received usual care (UC). The ERAS group received a mean of 2.4 (0-13) inpatient OMEs and the UC group received 13.7 (0-80) (p = 0.002). The ERAS group received 2.0 (0-40) OMEs at discharge and the UC group received 59.8 (0-120) (p < 0.001). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the patients who received the ERAS protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received the ERAS protocol required less postoperative opioids and reported lower pain scores when compared to a control group.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Mastectomia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Seleção de Pacientes , Adulto , Protocolos Clínicos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Alta do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Padrões de Prática Médica
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 26(10): 3368-3373, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31342387

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is an effective adjunct in managing perioperative pain. We sought to determine if the use of intraoperative ketorolac as part of a multimodal ERAS protocol increased the risk of bleeding complications in breast surgery. METHODS: A subset analysis of a prospective cohort study including patients undergoing lumpectomy and mastectomy compared two groups: those who received intraoperative ketorolac and those who did not. Bleeding complications were compared using Fisher's exact test or t test, and analyzed with respect to surgical modality. Patients undergoing immediate reconstruction were excluded. RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-eight breast surgeries were performed in a 13-month period: 157 lumpectomy patients and 57 mastectomy patients met inclusion criteria between July 2017 and August 2018. Two hundred and fourteen patients were included in the analysis: 115 received ketorolac and 99 did not. The two groups were similar with regards to sex, age, race, tobacco use, and comorbidities. When analyzed together, there was no difference in bleeding complications between the group that received intraoperative ketorolac and those who did not (2% vs. 2.6%, p = 1.00). No hematomas occurred in the lumpectomy patients, and three occurred in mastectomy patients: one of which received ketorolac, and two did not (5.9% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.575). The rates of seroma, infection, or dehiscence were not significantly different between the two groups, regardless of surgical modality. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intraoperative ketorolac is a useful adjunct in perioperative pain management in breast surgery and does not increase the risk of bleeding.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Cetorolaco/administração & dosagem , Mastectomia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/patologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 174(2): 307-313, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30536119

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor to invasive ductal carcinoma. The authors sought to discuss the evidence suggesting that not all DCIS will progress to invasive disease if left untreated. RESULTS: Four lines of evidence align to suggest that not all of this in-situ disease progresses to invasive cancer: its prevalence on screening mammography, studies of missed diagnoses, incidental findings in autopsy specimens, and large retrospective reviews of those treated with excision alone. CONCLUSION: A clearer understanding of the variable history of DCIS coupled with advances in genomic profiling of the disease holds the promise of reducing widespread over-treatment of this non-invasive cancer. Additionally, identification of higher risk of recurrence subsets may select patients for whom more aggressive treatment may be appropriate.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/epidemiologia , Progressão da Doença , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Achados Incidentais , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina de Precisão , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...