PRIDASE 2024 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in endodontics: A consensus-based development.

Studies investigating the accuracy of diagnostic tests should provide data on how effectively they identify or exclude disease in order to inform clinicians responsible for managing patients. This consensus-based project was undertaken to develop reporting guidelines for authors submitting manuscripts, which describe studies that have evaluated the accuracy of diagnostic tests in endodontics. These guidelines are known as the Preferred Reporting Items for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Endodontics (PRIDASE) 2024 guidelines. A nine-member steering committee created an initial checklist by integrating and modifying items from the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 checklist and the Clinical and Laboratory Images in Publications (CLIP) principles, as well as adding a number of new items specific to the specialty of endodontics. Thereafter, the steering committee formed the PRIDASE Delphi Group (PDG) and the PRIDASE Online Meeting Group (POMG) in order to collect expert feedback on the preliminary draft checklist. Members of the Delphi group engaged in an online Delphi process to reach consensus on the clarity and suitability of the items in the checklist. The online meeting group then held an in-depth discussion on the online Delphi-generated items via the Zoom platform on 20 October 2023. According to the feedback obtained, the steering committee revised the PRIDASE checklist, which was then piloted by several authors when preparing manuscripts describing diagnostic accuracy studies in endodontics. Feedback from this process resulted in the final version of the PRIDASE 2024 checklist, which has 11 sections and 66 items. Authors are encouraged to use the PRIDASE 2024 guidelines when developing manuscripts on diagnostic accuracy in endodontics in order to improve the quality of reporting in this area. Editors of relevant journals will be invited to include these guidelines in their instructions to authors.

Incidence of Middle Mesial Canals in Mandibular Molars during Root Canal Treatment and Nonsurgical Retreatment.

INTRODUCTION: Large-scale clinical studies on the incidence of middle mesial canals (MMCs) in nonsurgical root canal treatment (RCT) and retreatment of mandibular molars are lacking. The primary aim of this observational study was to determine the incidence of MMCs in mandibular first and second molars that received RCT or nonsurgical retreatment (NSRetx). The secondary aim was to determine factors associated with incidence of MMCs. METHODS: Included were 3018 mandibular molars that received RCT (n = 1624) or NSRetx (n = 1394) by 3 endodontists in a private practice. Demographic and procedural data were collected. Bivariate and multivariable (Poisson regression model) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Incidence of MMCs was 8.8% (n = 267). Although the bivariate analysis showed that NSRetx was significantly associated with incidence of MMCs, this association did not reach the threshold for statistical significance after controlling for all covariates (P = .07). Multivariable analysis on the entire cohort showed that incidence of MMCs was significantly associated with younger age (risk ratio [RR] = 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.06), male gender (RR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.85), preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (RR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.17-1.89), and first molar (RR = 2.30; 95% CI:1.74-3.05). Subgroup multivariable analyses revealed that incidence of MMCs was associated with male gender only in the RCT group (RR = 2.26; 95% CI, 1.55-3.30) but not in the NSRetx group (RR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82, 1.50); and with preoperative CBCT only in the NSRetx group (RR = 1.78; 95% CI, 1.28, 2.50) but not in the RCT group (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.71, 1.69). Associations with younger age and first molar remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Overall incidence of MMCs was 8.8%. Incidence of MMCs was significantly higher in younger patients and in mandibular first molars but was not associated with the type of treatment.

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Temporomandibular Disorder Pain Screener in Patients Seeking Endodontic Treatment for Tooth Pain.

INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the accuracy of a TMD Pain Screener questionnaire in identifying patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain among those seeking endodontic treatment for tooth pain. It also investigated whether the screener accuracy could be improved by adding questions regarding putative predictors of TMD status. METHODS: One hundred patients seeking endodontic treatment for tooth pain were enrolled. Participants completed the 6-question TMD Pain Screener before treatment. A board-certified orofacial pain specialist/endodontic resident conducted endodontic and TMD examinations using validated Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and positive/negative predictive values (PPVs/NPVs) were calculated for the 6-question and 3-question versions of the TMD Pain Screener. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses were performed to determine the screening accuracy. RESULTS: At the screening threshold of ≥3, TMD Pain Screener's sensitivity was 0.85, specificity 0.52, PPV 0.68, and NPV 0.75 for the 6-question version and 0.64, 0.65, 0.69, and 0.61, respectively, for the 3-question version. The AUROC was 0.71 (95% CL: 0.61, 0.82) and 0.60 (95% CL: 0.48, 0.71) for full and short versions, respectively. Adding a rating of current pain intensity of the chief complaint to the screener improved the AUROC to 0.81 (95% CL: 0.72, 0.89) and 0.77 (95% CL: 0.67, 0.86) for full and short versions, respectively, signifying useful overall accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-question TMD Pain Screener, combined with the patient's rating of current pain intensity of the chief complaint, could be recommended for use in endodontic patients with tooth pain for detecting painful TMD.

Expression of Selected Inflammatory Mediators with Different Clinical Characteristics of Pulpal Inflammation.

INTRODUCTION: Accurately diagnosing the state of dental pulp is crucial when addressing tooth pain to determine the best treatment approach. This study aimed to investigate the concentration of inflammatory mediators in the dental pulp of mature teeth that have been exposed via caries but show no signs of apical periodontitis. METHODS: Samples of pulpal blood from adults with mature teeth responsive to pulp testing and have carious pulp exposures were obtained. These samples were analyzed for 12 inflammatory cytokines and other inflammatory proteins using the Luminex assay platform. Clinical factors were correlated with cytokine levels, and statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of these factors on cytokine expression. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients that were included, 44.44% took pain medications, 33.33% had prolonged pulpal bleeding, 41.67% felt spontaneous pain, and 72.22% were diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Significant correlations existed between presenting pain scores and levels of interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-6, and IL-8 (P < .05). Factors like analgesic medication intake, pain to percussion, pain to thermal testing, spontaneous pain, and nocturnal pain were significantly associated with higher levels of specific inflammatory proteins. No significant associations were observed with pain to palpation, bleeding time, or pulpal diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory proteins, including cytokine levels may play a critical role in characterizing pulpal inflammation. Future studies should investigate the role of these potential biomarkers in determining the diagnosis of pulpitis and the prognosis of vital pulp therapy.

Prevalence of Fusobacterium Species in Endodontic Infections Detected With Molecular Methods: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Endodontic infections are polymicrobial; however, investigating the role of bacterial species is critical because they may influence pathogenesis, the development of symptoms, or the persistence of disease. This systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of Fusobacterium species and its association with different types of endodontic infections. METHODS: MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were used as electronic databases to retrieve relevant studies. The studies were evaluated for eligibility criteria, and the certainty in evidence and risk of bias were evaluated using critical appraisal tools for prevalence studies from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Forty studies were selected for meta-analysis and statistically analyzed for the relationship between the prevalence of Fusobacterium species and both the presence of symptoms and the type of infections (primary vs secondary/persistent) using meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of Fusobacterium spp. in endodontic infections ranged from 3%-100% (mean = 42.51%) in the 40 included studies. Calculated confidence intervals indicated that the presence of Fusobacterium spp. was not statistically associated with the presence of symptoms or with the type of infections (the set of 2 predictors was not significant; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of Fusobacterium infection, which was identified with molecular methods, was not significant for overall regression using both predictors (ie, symptoms [symptomatic vs asymptomatic] and types of infections [primary vs secondary/persistent]).

An Ex-Vivo Model for Investigating Bacterial Extrusion from Infected Root Canals during Masticatory Function.

INTRODUCTION: The extrusion of bacteria from infected root canals may lead to increase in symptoms, expansion of periapical lesions, and contribution to systemic diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate a potential proof-of-concept model to study the extent to which bacteria can escape from infected root canals under dynamic loading (simulated chewing). METHODS: The study was completed in 2 experiments performed at 2 institutions. Biofilms of Streptococcus intermedius in the first experiment and S. intermedius and Actinomyces naeslundii were allowed to grow in root canals of single-rooted extracted teeth for 3 weeks. The roots of the teeth were suspended in a small chamber containing dental transport medium and were mounted on a lower sample holder of a chewing simulator. In the experimental group, simulated chewing cycles equivalent to 1 year of function were conducted, and then bacterial migration was quantified and compared with stationary teeth. RESULTS: All experimental samples of the loading group revealed bacterial penetration in both experiments. Several of the unloaded samples revealed no bacterial penetration. In the first experiment, a significantly higher number of bacteria were able to escape into the periapex of the loaded group compared with the unloaded group (P = .017). In the second experiment, there was no significant difference between the 2 bacterial species used in the amount of extruded bacteria; however, there was a highly significant effect for occlusal loading (P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The potential for occlusal forces to enhance bacterial extrusion from infected root canals should be further explored.

Flare-ups After Nonsurgical Retreatments: Incidence, Associated Factors, and Prediction.

INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to determine the incidence, associated factors, and predictability of flare-ups after nonsurgical retreatments (NSRetx). METHODS: All patients (n = 3,666) who received NSRetx by 3 endodontists in 2 endodontic offices during a period of 6 years (2016-2022) were included. Demographic, diagnostic, and procedural data were collected. A flare-up was defined as moderate-severe pain with/without swelling that took place within 14 days of initiation of NSRetx and resulted in an unscheduled appointment. Bivariate analyses on the entire cohort and multivariable analyses on cases with complete dataset (n = 2,846) were performed to identify significant associations. A Random Forest algorithm was used to make a prediction model. RESULTS: Incidence of flare-ups was 3.95% (n = 145). Increased risk of flare-ups was associated with diabetes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.97), mandibular teeth (AOR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.11-2.52), moderate-severe preoperative pain on percussion (AOR = 2.13; 95% CI, 1.31-3.50), and pain on palpation (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.01-2.64). Lower risk of flare-up was associated with high blood pressure (AOR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.82) (P < .05). The prediction model was not able to predict flare-ups with sufficient confidence (precision = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of flare-ups following NSRetx was low (∼4%) and had a weak but significant association with the history of diabetes. Moderate-severe pain on percussion, pain on palpation (any intensity), and mandibular teeth had a significant association with flare-ups. The history of high blood pressure was associated with lower risk of flare-ups. Flare-ups were difficult to predict in this clinical setting.

Prevalence of painful temporomandibular disorders in endodontic patients with tooth pain.

BACKGROUND: Pain from temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) may mimic endodontic pain, but its prevalence in endodontic patients is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional study investigated the prevalence of painful TMDs in patients presenting for endodontic treatment of a painful tooth. Contribution of TMD pain to the chief complaint and characteristics associated with TMD prevalence were also assessed. METHODS: Patients reporting tooth pain in the 30 days before attending university clinics for nonsurgical root canal treatment or retreatment were enrolled. Before endodontic treatment, they completed questionnaires and a board-certified orofacial pain specialist/endodontic resident diagnosed TMD using published Diagnostic Criteria for TMD. Log-binomial regression models estimated prevalence ratios to quantify associations with patient characteristics. RESULTS: Among 100 patients enrolled, prevalence of painful TMDs was 54%. In 26% of patients, TMD pain was unrelated to endodontic pain; in 20%, TMD contributed to their chief pain complaint; and in 8%, TMD was a sole aetiology for pain. TMD prevalence was associated with greater intensity, frequency and duration of the chief pain complaint; pain in more than one tooth; tenderness to tooth percussion and palpation; a diagnosis of symptomatic apical periodontitis; pain medication use; and psychological distress. CONCLUSION: A majority of patients with tooth pain seeking endodontic treatment had painful TMDs; one quarter had TMD as a component or sole cause of their pain. TMD prevalence was associated with more severe symptoms and signs of tooth pain and with psychological factors. The high frequency of TMD comorbidity warrants consideration in management of endodontic patients with history of toothache.