Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting biceps pathology in patients with rotator cuff disorders: comparison with arthroscopy.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the validity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection of biceps disease. The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement properties of noncontrasted MRI in diagnosis of biceps disease using arthroscopic surgery as the "gold standard." MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected surgical data of patients with impingement syndrome or rotator cuff tear, with biceps disease (study group) or without biceps disease (control group), were reviewed. MRI reports of radiologists with fellowship training in musculoskeletal imaging were retrospectively reviewed and compared with surgical findings. RESULTS: Data of 183 (130 study and 53 control) patients (73 women [40%], 110 men [60%]; mean age, 62 years [standard deviation, 9]) who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff-related surgery during a period of 11 years were used for analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detection of full tears of the biceps tendon were 0.54 and 0.98, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.27 and 0.86 for partial tears of the biceps tendon, respectively. For biceps subluxation or dislocation, sensitivity was 1.00 and specificity was 0.83. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, which quantify the overall accuracy of the tests, were 0.57, 0.75, and 0.92 for partial tear, full tear, and instability of the biceps tendon, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Noncontrasted MRI has a low sensitivity and high specificity for detection of full-thickness tears of the biceps tendon. It is highly sensitive for diagnosis of instability of the long head of the biceps. However, its usefulness for diagnosis of partial tears of the biceps tendon remains limited.

Outcome of distal clavicle resection in patients with acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis and full-thickness rotator cuff tear.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of distal clavicle resection (DCR) on subjective and objective outcome measures in patients with acromioclavicular (AC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) and rotator cuff tear. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of consecutive patients with arthroscopic evidence of OA of the ACJ with complete data at 2 years were used for the data analysis. Patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the AC joint underwent a DCR in conjunction with rotator cuff repair, while patients with mild OA of the ACJ underwent surgery related to concomitant rotator cuff tear without a DCR. RESULTS: Data of 184 (72 females, 112 males, mean age: 62) patients with rotator cuff tear and varying degrees of OA of the AC joint were used for the analysis. Of 184 patients, 144 (78 %) had a resection of distal clavicle (resection group) and 40 (22 %) did not have a resection (no-resection group). Both groups showed a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) improvement in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, Constant Murley score, and strength. Multivariable analysis showed that lower pre-operative ASES scores (higher disability), having a larger tear, an active compensation claim, and not having a DCR, had a negative impact on post-operative ASES scores. CONCLUSION: When untreated surgically, even mild arthroscopic findings of AC joint OA may lead to a poorer outcome after rotator cuff repair. Further characterisation of patients in whom mild arthroscopic findings of OA of AC joint are clinically significant and warrant resection is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective outcome study, Level II.