Evaluation of Absorbable Mesh for Prophylactic Mesh Augmentation in High-Risk Patients.

PURPOSE: Hernia prevention following abdominal surgery has become a subject of growing interest in general surgery. Prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA) is an emerging technique to prevent incisional hernia in high-risk populations. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of PMA using an absorbable mesh. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent PMA between July 2014 and March 2020. A prophylactic synthetic absorbable mesh (Phasix™; Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) was placed at the surgeon's discretion according to the indication for the primary operation. The primary outcome was the incisional hernia rate. Secondary outcomes included mesh-related or other complications. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent PMA following cystectomy with ileal conduit, open aortic surgery, or colostomy creation/takedown. Overall, 10 patients (20%) developed hernia at a median follow-up of 2.2 years. Six of these 10 hernias occurred at incisions where mesh was not placed. There were no documented mesh infections. One mesh (2%) in the AAA group was explanted due to an infected endograft, but there was no evidence of mesh complication. Two patients (4%) developed seroma. Two (4%) patients developed superficial surgical site infections (SSI). There were no documented deep-space SSI. CONCLUSION: PMA is an emerging technique with a low rate of incisional hernia in high-risk patients, such as those undergoing stoma creation or open aortic intervention. The use of an absorbable mesh seems promising, however more and longer-term research is needed.

Clinical Application of the Measurement of Abdominal Wall Tension in Hernia Repair.

Abdominal wall tension is an integral concept in hernia repair. Most of the described techniques attempt to reduce abdominal wall tension by using mesh prosthetics or myofascial release. Although the concept of a "tension-free" hernia repair is well-understood and appreciated by surgeons, quantitative information about abdominal wall tension is limited. This review evaluates the published literature related to abdominal wall tension and summarizes how the measurement of intraoperative tension can guide clinical decision-making. Most of the methods and techniques for measuring abdominal wall tension are similar and involve the use of tensiometers. However, there is no accepted standardized technique. Baseline tension measurements confirm the concept of a baseline physiological tension, and it has been observed that tension does not correlate with hernia width. When the tension is considered to be too great during hernia repair, intraoperative techniques such as myofascial release can be used to reduce tension to physiological values. Emerging data from clinical studies on tension have added to our understanding of the mechanics and physiology of the abdominal wall. Standardized devices and measurement techniques need to be developed and validated to foster the utility of tension measurements in hernia repair.

An Evaluation of Fascial Closure Techniques in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: Practice Patterns and Short-Term Outcomes.

The best method for fascial closure during hernia repair remains unknown. This study evaluates the impact of fascial closure techniques on short-term outcomes. All patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair were queried using the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative database. Analysis was stratified by suture type (absorbable and permanent) and technique (figure-of-eight, running, and interrupted). Outcome measures included SSI, surgical site occurrence (SSO), SSO requiring intervention, recurrence rate, and quality of life. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used. The study included 6544 patients. Two-thirds of surgeons closed fascia during ventral hernia repair with absorbable suture and one-third with permanent suture. In the absorbable group, 17 per cent used figure-of-eight, 46 per cent running, and 4 per cent interrupted suture. In the permanent group, 13 per cent used figure-of-eight, 8 per cent running, and 11 per cent interrupted suture. There was no significant association between SSO and closure technique (P = 0.2). However, SSO and suture type were significant (P < 0.001) with the odds of SSO for closure with absorbable suture being 62 per cent higher than the odds of permanent. Fascial closure technique and suture type had no significant association (P > 0.5) with SSI, SSO requiring intervention, hernia recurrence rate, or HerQLes or NIH PROMIS 3a scores at 30 days or 6 months. Fascial closure technique and suture material do not have a major impact on outcomes in ventral hernia repair. Despite a significantly higher rate of SSO for absorbable sutures than permanent, this did not increase the rate of interventions.

Prophylactic Mesh for Hernia Prevention: Has the Time Arrived?

Incisional and parastomal hernias continue to be vexing problems for patients and surgeons. Risk factors are generally patient-related and/or technical in nature, and in some cases, can be altered, resulting in improved outcomes. Improved fascial closure techniques can only partly reduce the risk of incisional hernia formation. Even under optimal circumstances, using time tested closure techniques and materials, the rate remains high, due primarily to factors that are not modifiable or are unidentifiable. In such cases, there may be a beneficial role for prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA), wherein mesh is implanted at the time of initial surgery or stoma formation. Several high-risk groups that might benefit from PMA have been identified, including patients undergoing open abdominal aneurysm repair or colorectal procedures, obese patients, and patients requiring creation of permanent gastrointestinal or urological stomas. Although the initial results of PMA are promising, the benefits of this strategy must be weighed against potential risks. Outcome measures to assess efficacy should include not only hernia recurrence but also quality of life, surgical-site occurrences, and cost. Further studies are warranted to predict which specific patient populations might benefit most from PMA and to identify ideal mesh materials as well as preferred implantation sites and methods of mesh fixation.

An Evaluation of Parastomal Hernia Repair Using the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative.

The purpose of this review was to evaluate outcomes relating to parastomal hernia repair. Data from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative were used to identify patients undergoing parastomal hernia repair from 2013 to 2016. Parastomal hernia repairs were compared with other repairs using Pearson's test and Wilcoxon test with a P value <0.05 considered significant. Parastomal hernia repairs were performed in 311 patients. Techniques of repair include open in 85 per cent and laparoscopic in 15 per cent. Mesh was used in 92 per cent with keyhole in 34 per cent, flat mesh in 33 per cent, and Sugarbaker in 25 per cent. Mesh types were permanent synthetic in 79 per cent, biologic in 13 per cent, absorbable synthetic in 6 per cent, and hybrid synthetic/biologic in 2 per cent. Most common location for mesh was sublay in 84 per cent followed by onlay in 14 per cent and inlay in 2 per cent with 59 per cent of patients undergoing a myofascial release. Ostomy disposition included ostomy left in situ (47%), moved to a new site (18%), taken down (22%), and rematured in same location in (13%). Outcomes related to parastomal hernia repair included 10 per cent surgical site infection, 24 per cent surgical site occurrence, and 12 per cent surgical site occurrences requiring procedural interventions with a 13 per cent readmission rate and 6 per cent reoperation rate. When comparing parastomal hernias with other ventral hernia repairs, parastomal hernias had a significantly higher surgical site infection, surgical site occurrence, surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention, readmission, reoperation rate, and length of stay, and were less commonly performed laparoscopically (P < 0.05). Most parastomal hernias are being repaired open with synthetic mesh in the sublay position. Less favorable outcomes of parastomal hernia repair when compared with other ventral hernia repairs are likely related to the complexity of parastomal hernia repair.

The prevalence of trachoma in Australia: the National Indigenous Eye Health Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of trachoma among Indigenous Australians. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A national, stratified, random cluster sample survey of Indigenous children (5-15 years) and adults (>or= 40 years) in 30 communities across Australia. Data collection was undertaken in 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results based on a standardised protocol that included trachoma grading and double grading of photographs of the tarsus. RESULTS: 1694 Indigenous children and 1189 Indigenous adults were examined. Recruitment rates were 84% for children and 72% for adults. The overall rate of follicular trachomatous inflammation among children was 3.8%, ranging from 0.6% in major cities to 7.3% in very remote areas; 50% of communities in very remote areas had endemic rates (> 5%). Trachomatous scarring (TS) occurred among 15.7% of adults, trachomatous trichiasis (TT) among 1.4% and corneal opacity (CO) among 0.3%. TS was found in all regions and TT in all except major cities and inner regional areas. The highest community rates for TS were 58.3%; for TT, 14.6%; and for CO, 3.3%. CONCLUSION: Blinding endemic trachoma remains a major public health problem in many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. Although active trachoma is predominantly seen in very remote communities, scarring and blinding sequelae occur among Indigenous people across the country. The Australian Government's recent commitment to eliminate blinding trachoma is welcomed and much needed.

Ethics review of multisite studies: the difficult case of community-based indigenous health research.

Researchers have longstanding concerns about the logistical and administrative burdens posed by ethics review of multisite studies involving human participants. Centralised ethics review, in which approval by one committee has authority across multiple sites, is widely touted as a strategy for streamlining the process. The Harmonisation of Multi-centre Ethical Review (HoMER) project is currently developing such a system for Australia. It is unclear how centralised review will work for multisite Indigenous health research, where the views of local stakeholders are important and community consultation is mandatory. Our recent experience in conducting the National Indigenous Eye Health Survey (NIEHS) shows how elaborate the current ethics approval and community consultation processes can be, and points to several lessons and ideas to guide pending reforms.