Intravenous lipid emulsion interference in coagulation testing: an ex vivo analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous lipid emulsion is used in the rescue treatment of certain poisonings. A complication is interference with laboratory analyses. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of intravenous lipid emulsion on routine laboratory analysis of coagulation parameters ex vivo and determine if any of the analytical techniques remain reliable. METHODS: Samples were obtained from 19 healthy volunteers and divided in triplicate. One sample served as a control, and the other two were diluted to simulate the treatment of an average adult with Intralipid® 20 per cent Fresenius Kabi 100 mL (dilution-1) or 500 mL (dilution-2). Coagulation tests performed were prothrombin time, activated prothrombin time, D-dimer concentration and fibrinogen. Coagulation testing was performed by three techniques. Test-1 was performed on a Sysmex CN6000 analyzer. Test-2 was performed with a manual mechanical endpoint method using the semi-automated Stago KC4 Delta. Test-3 involved high-speed centrifugation before repeat testing on the Sysmex CN6000 analyzer. RESULTS: For test-1, only nine (47 per cent) samples in dilution-1 could be analyzed for coagulation tests, and no coagulation tests could be analyzed for dilution-2 because of lipaemia. For test-2 and test-3, all samples could be analyzed, and all results of both testing methods fell within the limits of the laboratory reference range. DISCUSSION: Difficulties in laboratory analysis of patients having received intravenous lipid emulsion are due to multiple factors. Most automated coagulation analyzers use optical measurements, which can be unreliable in the presence of a high intravenous lipid concentration. By altering the lipaemia in the testing solution using high-speed centrifugation or by using manual mechanical endpoint detection, we were able to obtain reliable results. These findings are limited by the use of an ex vivo method and healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: This ex vivo model confirms that Intralipid® interferes with routine coagulation studies. It is important that clinicians are aware and inform their laboratories of its administration.

Taipan snake venom time has high sensitivity for lupus anticoagulants in non-anticoagulated, triple positive antiphospholipid syndrome patients.

INTRODUCTION: Dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) are the mainstay assays in lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection yet they have limitations, particularly in relation to interferences and specificity. The recently validated Taipan snake venom time (TSVT) screening with ecarin time (ET) confirmatory assays overcome many of those limitations due to the innate specificity engendered from direct prothrombin activation, and insensitivity to the effects of vitamin K antagonists (VKA). The present study aimed to further evidence diagnostic utility of TSVT/ET by performing them in samples from 116 nonanticoagulated patients with established triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: Samples were identified in three expert centres who performed dRVVT, APTT and solid phase antiphospholipid antibody assays with reagents from a variety of manufacturers. All samples additionally received TSVT/ET analysis using standardised reagents. RESULTS: Ninety seven of 116 (83.6%) were dRVVT- and APTT-positive, 85/97 (87.6%) of which were TSVT/ET-positive, 9/116 (7.8%) were dRVVT-positive only, 6 of which were TSVT/ET-positive, and 10/116 (8.6%) were APTT-positive only, 5 of which were TSVT/ET-positive. 96/116 TSVT/ET-positivity returned a high sensitivity for LA of 82.8%. Low coefficients of determination revealed weak relationships between LA potency and anticardiolipin and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibody titres for all three LA assays. CONCLUSIONS: TSVT/ET has high sensitivity for the clinically significant LA found in triple positive APS patients. TSVT/ET can establish multiple LA assay positivity in nonanticoagulated patients negative for one of dRVVT or APTT, and is the only assay pairing insensitive to VKAs, the recommended anticoagulation for APS.

Triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome does not guarantee positivity in each lupus anticoagulant assay.

BACKGROUND: Triple positivity for all 3 criteria antiphospholipid antibodies confers high risk of symptom development in carriers, and recurrence in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Most triple-positivity studies report lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing as positive without distinguishing between positivity with dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and single-assay positivity or only perform dRVVT. Single LA assay repertoires remain in use in some centers, which risks missing some triple positives. Positivity with both assays may identify higher risk. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency of single LA assay positivity in triple-positive patients. METHODS: Three hundred forty-two triple-positive profiles from nonanticoagulated patients (237 APS, 45 systemic lupus erythematosus without APS symptoms, and 60 nonclinical criteria) were identified from laboratory databases and assessed for LA positivity by dRVVT and/or APTT. RESULTS: Seventy-three of 237 (30.8%) APS samples were LA-positive with 1 assay, 40/237 (16.9%) by dRVVT only, and 33/237 (13.9%) with APTT only. Nineteen of 45 (42.2%) were LA-positive with 1 assay in the systemic lupus erythematosus cohort; 12/45 (26.7%) with dRVVT only and 7/45 (15.5%) with APTT only. Thirty-three of 60 (55.0%) were LA-positive with 1 assay in the nonclinical criteria cohort; 24/60 (40.0%) with dRVVT only and 9/60 (15.0%) with APTT only. The most common solid-phase assay profile was elevated immunoglobulin G aCL and aß2GPI. CONCLUSION: Up to 55.0% of triple-positive samples were positive in 1 LA assay, representing significant potential for misdiagnosis and inappropriate management via single LA assay repertoires.

Clinical utility of sample preheat treatment in a modified Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (mNBA) for inhibitor monitoring in congenital and acquired haemophilia A: A single-centre four-year experience.

INTRODUCTION: Laboratory monitoring for factor VIII inhibitors ideally requires samples with the lowest possible factor VIII (FVIII) level, potentially challenging in patients with congenital haemophilia A (CHA) receiving regular prophylaxis and acquired haemophilia A (AHA) patients with endogenous FVIII. Inactivation of FVIII by preheating (preheat treatment, PHT) of patient plasma has been suggested to facilitate monitoring. AIM: To evaluate the clinical utility of PHT prior to inhibitor analysis by modified Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (mNBA) in patients with CHA and AHA. METHODS: Inhibitor screening by mNBA under standard conditions and with PHT at 56°C for 30, 60 and 90 minutes was evaluated. FVIII inhibitor results between 2007 and 2010 without PHT (720 results from 222 CHA and AHA patients), and between 2011 and 2014 post-PHT (1102 results from 302 patients) were available for analysis. RESULTS: Of total 1822 results available, 61% were from severe HA patients, 22% from mild and moderate HA and 16% from AHA. Pre-PHT, 74% of samples were analysed by the mNBA, and the remaining 26% were not tested as FVIII levels were >20 IU/dL as per local protocol. Postintroduction of PHT (90 and 60 minutes), 96% of samples received were analysed for an inhibitor. Post-PHT in patients with AHA (n = 26), 69% of samples tested with factor VIII levels >20 IU/dL were found to have detectable inhibitor. CONCLUSION: FVIII inhibitor testing using PHT at 56°C for 60 minutes facilitates inhibitor surveillance of CHA on prophylaxis. Potentially, 30 minutes at 56°C might be equally efficacious. In AHA receiving immunosuppression, monitoring of inhibitor titre after initial factor VIII response might enable personalized immunosuppression.