Interinstitutional variation of caesarean delivery rates according to indications in selected obstetric populations: a prospective multicenter study.

The aim of the study was to identify which groups of women contribute to interinstitutional variation of caesarean delivery (CD) rates and which are the reasons for this variation. In this regard, 15,726 deliveries from 11 regional centers were evaluated using the 10-group classification system. Standardized indications for CD in each group were used. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to calculate (1) relationship between institutional CD rates and relative sizes/CD rates in each of the ten groups/centers; (2) correlation between institutional CD rates and indications for CD in each of the ten groups/centers. Overall CD rates correlated with both CD rates in spontaneous and induced labouring nulliparous women with a single cephalic pregnancy at term (P = 0.005). Variation of CD rates was also dependent on relative size and CD rates in multiparous women with previous CD, single cephalic pregnancy at term (P < 0.001). As for the indications, "cardiotocographic anomalies" and "failure to progress" in the group of nulliparous women in spontaneous labour and "one previous CD" in multiparous women previous CD correlated significantly with institutional CD rates (P = 0.021, P = 0.005, and P < 0.001, resp.). These results supported the conclusion that only selected indications in specific obstetric groups accounted for interinstitutional variation of CD rates.

Role of hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy to rule out endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonographic endometrial thickness and outpatient hysteroscopy, to establish the most appropriate exam for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). The secondary aim was to develop a multivariable approach considering clinical history as an added value for these diagnostic procedures. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on 220 consecutive postmenopausal patients with AUB, who underwent ultrasonographic evaluation of endometrial thickness, outpatient hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value was performed. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) was calculated to assess the global performance of ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness and diagnostic hysteroscopy as tests for detecting endometrial cancer and atrophy. RESULTS: Histological findings for <4 mm level revealed that atrophy was present in 48 (65%) and in 2 cases (2.7%) endometrial cancer was found; for > or = 4 mm values polyps and myomas were present in 86 (59%) and there were 11 (7.5%) endometrial cancer. Sensibility and specificity for trans-vaginal ultrasound, with a cut-off value > or = 4 mm, was 55.6% and 49.7% while positive predictive value was 83.3% and negative predictive value 98.1% (ROC curve 0.597). Hysteroscopy revealed sensitivity 100%, specificity 49.6%, positive predictive value 81.3% and negative predictive value 100% (ROC curve 0.993). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, endometrial thickness <4 mm can miss malignancies but trans-vaginal ultrasound remains the first line diagnostic procedure in postmenopausal women without AUB, because it is not invasive and has high sensitivity for detecting endometrial cancer and other endometrial disease; according to our experience, outpatient hysteroscopy with biopsy is mandatory in all postmenopausal women with AUB.

Carbon dioxide versus normal saline in outpatient hysteroscopy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to measure patients' discomfort after hysteroscopy with CO(2) or normal saline. METHODS: A total of 415 patients was randomized to two groups according to distension medium (CO(2), n = 201; normal saline, n = 214). The nature of randomization was to alternate distension media on a weekly basis. After hysteroscopy, women were asked to rate the pain experienced on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (0 = no pain; 100 = worst imaginable pain). Pain scores were expressed as mean +/- SD (0-40 = minimal; 41-70 = moderate; 71-100 = severe). Data were analysed using Student's t-test. RESULTS: Irrespective of the distension medium used, pelvic discomfort was worse in nulliparous women (pain score 39.0 +/- 26.5) than in multiparous women (30.4 +/- 25.9) (P < 0.05), especially if they were premenopausal. For all patients and both distension media, pelvic discomfort was generally minimal but higher in patients who had undergone hysteroscopy with normal saline (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CO(2) and normal saline were comparable with regard to patient discomfort, but in terms of the high frequency of abnormal uterine bleeding, normal saline may be the most appropriate distension medium for outpatient hysteroscopy.