Less abnormal uterine bleeding with dabigatran than warfarin in women treated for acute venous thromboembolism.

Essentials Factor Xa inhibitors cause more abnormal menstrual bleeding (AUB) than vitamin-K antagonists (VKA). We analyzed data of AUB in women, evaluating dabigatran versus VKA. We observed a 41% lower risk of AUB in women on dabigatran compared to those on VKA. Our findings of lower AUB risk on dabigatran should be corroborated in future studies. SUMMARY: Introduction Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with a better safety profile than warfarin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct factor Xa inhibitors involve a higher risk of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). We aimed to determine the risk of AUB during anticoagulation with dabigatran compared with warfarin. Methods Post-hoc analysis of the pooled RE-COVER studies and the RE-MEDY trial. Incidences of AUB, based on a defined preferred terms search for adverse events, in female patients aged 18-50 years treated with dabigatran, were compared with those in women treated with warfarin. Results Of the 2964 women included in the above-mentioned trials, 1280 women were in the relevant age category (18-50 years) and included in the current analysis. A total of 643 patients were randomized to treatment with dabigatran and 637 to treatment with warfarin. The overall rate of AUB was 8.1%, 5.9% for the women treated with dabigatran and 9.6% in those treated with warfarin, for an odds ratio for dabigatran-treated patients of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.90; P = 0.015). In the dabigatran-treated patients, three (0.5%) suffered major bleeding (MB) vs. five (0.8%) in the warfarin-treated patients (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.15-2.72). MB or non-major relevant bleeding occurred in 30 (4.7%) patients randomized to receive dabigatran and 57 (8.9%) randomized to receive warfarin (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.83). None of the bleeding events was fatal. Conclusion Dabigatran treatment was associated with a significantly (41%) lower risk of AUB than warfarin. Future studies in daily practice are needed to corroborate these findings.

Long-term safety and sustained efficacy of extended-release pramipexole in early and advanced Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of pramipexole as a once-daily (q.d.) extended-release oral formulation in early or advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: In two double-blind (DB) studies of early PD and one of advanced PD,active-treatment arms received pramipexole immediate release (IR) or extended release (ER), with exposure lasting up to 33 weeks. In open-label (OL) extensions that followed immediately, subjects took ER q.d. for up to 80 weeks, with dosage adjustment permitted (range 0.375-4.5 mg q.d.). RESULTS: Of 590 subjects completing an early-PD DB study, 511 entered the early-PD OL extension; 408 completed it. Reported adverse events (AEs) with incidence ≥10.0% were somnolence (15.1%), peripheral edema (11.7%) and back pain (10.6%). Of 465 subjects completing the advanced-PD DB study, 391 entered the advanced-PD OL extension; 329 completed it. Reported AEs with incidence ≥10.0%were dyskinesia (27.4%) and somnolence (13.6%). Impulse control disorders were identified by semi-structured interview in 13 subjects (1.4% of 902). In exploratory analyses, adjusted mean Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) PartsII + III scores (excluding ex-placebo recipients) remained substantially improved from DB baseline scores prior to pramipexole introduction, at -6.6 and -6.3 points amongst ex-DB-ER and ex-DB-IR recipients after 113 weeks of pramipexole (33 DB plus 80 OL) in early PD, and -11.5 and -9.1 after up to 113 weeks (up to 33 DB plus 80 OL) in advanced PD. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the long-term safety and efficacy of pramipexole ER in early and advanced PD. AEs were typical for dopaminergic medications, and UPDRS scores suggested sustained symptomatic benefit.

Patient-reported convenience of once-daily versus three-times-daily dosing during long-term studies of pramipexole in early and advanced Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In chronic diseases including Parkinson's disease (PD), complex pharmacotherapy dosing schedules are reported to reduce adherence, perhaps leading to less-effective symptom control and, in PD, more erratic stimulation of dopamine receptors. However, blinded clinical-trial designs preclude direct comparisons of adherence to various schedules. METHODS: In two double-blind (DB) studies of early PD and one of advanced PD, subjects received three-times-daily (t.i.d.) pramipexole or placebo. In open-label (OL) extensions, subjects took extended-release, once-daily (q.d.) pramipexole. At 24 or 32 OL weeks, q.d. versus t.i.d. dosing preference was surveyed by questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 590 DB-trial completers with early PD, 511 entered the OL extension. Of 374 survey respondents, 94.4% preferred q.d. dosing (72.2% of them found it 'very much more convenient' and 27.8%'more convenient'), 2.7% preferred t.i.d., and 2.9% chose 'no difference'. Of 465 DB-trial completers with advanced PD, 391 entered its OL extension. Of 334 survey respondents, 88.9% preferred q.d. dosing (59.9% of them found it 'very much more convenient' and 40.1%'more convenient'), 5.7% preferred t.i.d., and 5.4% chose 'no difference'. Results excluding DB-placebo recipients were highly similar. CONCLUSIONS: In this first direct comparison of patient preference for q.d. versus t.i.d. dopamine-agonist dosing, patients with early or advanced PD had a strong preference for q.d. rather than t.i.d. pramipexole. The high proportion of advanced-PD patients declaring this preference indicates that it does not depend on whether a patient is taking concomitant PD medications dosed more frequently than q.d.

Success rate, efficacy, and safety/tolerability of overnight switching from immediate- to extended-release pramipexole in advanced Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For Parkinson's disease (PD), an extended-release (ER) pramipexole formulation taken once daily, has shown efficacy, safety, and tolerability resembling those of immediate-release (IR) pramipexole taken three times daily. The present study assessed, in advanced PD, the success of an overnight switch from adjunctive IR to ER. METHODS: Levodopa users experiencing motor fluctuations were randomized to adjunctive double-blind (DB) placebo, IR, or ER. Amongst completers of ≥18 weeks, ER recipients were kept on DB ER, whilst IR recipients were switched overnight to DB ER at unchanged daily dosage. After a DB week, switch success was assessed. During the next 5 weeks, all patients underwent ER titration to optimal open-label maintenance dosage. RESULTS: One week post-switch, 86.2% of 123 IR-to-ER and 83.8% of 105 ER-to-ER patients had ≤15% (or ≤3-point, for pre-switch scores ≤20) increase on UPDRS Parts II + III, and 77.9% (of 122) and 70.2% (of 104) had ≤1-h increase in daily OFF-time. At 32 weeks, the groups showed comparable improvements from DB baseline (pramipexole inception), including, on UPDRS II + III, adjusted mean (SE) changes of -14.8 (1.5) for IR-to-ER and -13.3 (1.6) for ER-to-ER. Rates of premature discontinuation owing to adverse events were 6.5% for IR-to-ER and 4.9% for ER-to-ER. CONCLUSIONS: By OFF-time and UPDRS criteria, majorities of patients with advanced PD were successfully switched overnight from pramipexole IR to ER at unchanged daily dosage. During subsequent maintenance, pramipexole showed sustained efficacy, safety, and tolerability, regardless of formulation (IR or ER) in the preceding DB trial.