Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Foods ; 13(4)2024 Feb 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38397586

RESUMO

In accordance with U.S. FDA Foods Program Regulatory Science Steering Committee guidelines, with this study, we optimized and validated a commercial real-time PCR method for the detection of low amounts of lupin in four classes of food matrices: chocolate cookies, ragù, Olivier salad, and barley and rice flour. DNA extracted from blank (true negative) samples artificially contaminated with lupin (Lupinus albus) flour at 1000 ppm underwent dilutions with the DNA extracted from the true negative samples up to 0.5 ppm. The limit of detection for real-time PCR was 0.5 ppm in the complex matrices (range, Ct 26-34), making this a specific, robust, and rapid method for lupin allergen detection and labeling. Our validation data support the suitability of this commercially available real-time PCR method for this purpose.

2.
Foods ; 11(5)2022 Feb 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35267276

RESUMO

Food safety laboratories rely on validated methods that detect hidden allergens in food to ensure the safety and health of allergic consumers. Here we present test results for the validation and accreditation of a real-time PCR assay for the detection of peanut traces in food products. The method was tested on five classes of food matrices: bakery and pastry products, meats, ready-to-eat and dairy products, and grains and milling products. Blank samples were spiked starting with the peanut samples (Arachis hypogaea) at a concentration of 1000 ppm. Serial dilutions were then prepared with the DNA extracted from the blank samples to a final concentration of 0.5 ppm. The limit of detection in grains and milling products, ready-to-eat, meats, bakery and pastry products was 0.5 ppm (range, Ct 27-34) and 2.5 ppm in dairy products (range, Ct 25-34). In order to determine the exclusivity parameter of the method, the ragù matrix was contaminated with Prunus dulcis (almonds), Glycine max (soy), Sinapis alba (mustard), Apium graveolens (celery), Allium cepa (onion), Pisum sativum (peas), Daucus carota (carrots), and Theobroma cacao (cocoa); no cross-reactions were observed. The method was rated satisfactory for sensitivity (98%), specificity (100%), robustness, and repeatability and it was fully validated and accredited.

3.
Ital J Food Saf ; 3(2): 1700, 2014 Apr 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27800342

RESUMO

The US National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases defines food allergy as adverse health effect arising from a specific immune response that occurs reproducibly on exposure to a given food. Undeclared allergens in food label represent a risk for consumers, as there is no therapy for food allergies. According to Directive 2003/89/EC, declaration of all ingredients and derived substances in the label is mandatory. In 2011-2012, in Piedmont region (North-western Italy) 285 food samples were analysed for ß-lactoglobulin and 234 for egg proteins. The aim of this work was to analyse 2 years data in order to assess the presence of undeclared milk and egg allergenic proteins in food placed on the market checking the compliance of labeling of food allergens. Analyses were carried out with ELISA tests, both for the detection of the egg and milk proteins. ß-lactoglobulin was found in 2.8% (8/286) of samples, while egg proteins in 4.7% (11/234).

4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24779780

RESUMO

Several EC Directives have been promulgated to protect allergic individuals but no rule has been established with regard to allergen cross-contamination caused by shared transport vehicles or common processing equipment. The aim of this research was to quantify, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or real-time polymerase chain reaction, the presence in meat- or fish-based foods of four allergens (milk, egg, crustaceans and molluscs) that was not indicated either in the list of ingredients or in the label alert. In the time frame of 2007-2009, a total of 723 samples were subjected to 1983 analyses. The percentage of samples scoring positive ranged between 1.8% and 6.8% over the 3 years, and the concentrations of undeclared allergens found were 0.3-13.3 mg kg⁻¹ for milk (ß-lactoglobulin) and 0.21-12 mg kg⁻¹ for egg white proteins. On this basis, the possibility of cross-contamination serious enough to raise public health concern cannot be dismissed.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/análise , Proteínas Alimentares/análise , Produtos Pesqueiros/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos , Rotulagem de Alimentos , Produtos da Carne/análise , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/genética , Animais , Bovinos , Galinhas , Proteínas Alimentares/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Dietéticas do Ovo/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Dietéticas do Ovo/análise , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Produtos Pesqueiros/economia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/dietoterapia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/prevenção & controle , Inspeção de Alimentos , Humanos , Itália , Lactoglobulinas/efeitos adversos , Lactoglobulinas/análise , Limite de Detecção , Produtos da Carne/economia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Frutos do Mar/efeitos adversos , Frutos do Mar/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...